<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill Clinton Loses Domain Name Challenge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/02/bill-clinton-loses-domain-name-challenge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/02/bill-clinton-loses-domain-name-challenge/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luz Helena Villamil</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/02/bill-clinton-loses-domain-name-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-417952</link>
		<dc:creator>Luz Helena Villamil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 23:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6639#comment-417952</guid>
		<description>As a domain name panelist, I totally disagree with the decision taken in the present case. I would see prima facie bad faith in anyone who seeks registration of a the domain name presidentbillclinton.com since ¿what kind of clean interest could anyone claim in such domain name? ¿What legitimate interest could anyone have in using President&#039;s Clinton name? No doubt the registrant will use President&#039;s Clinton notoriety in its own benefit. what a shame!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a domain name panelist, I totally disagree with the decision taken in the present case. I would see prima facie bad faith in anyone who seeks registration of a the domain name presidentbillclinton.com since ¿what kind of clean interest could anyone claim in such domain name? ¿What legitimate interest could anyone have in using President&#8217;s Clinton name? No doubt the registrant will use President&#8217;s Clinton notoriety in its own benefit. what a shame!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/02/bill-clinton-loses-domain-name-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-417429</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6639#comment-417429</guid>
		<description>Enrico - regardless of whether or not the decision was right, I could see this going differently with another panelist.  That&#039;s why this is so frustrating -- inconsistency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enrico &#8211; regardless of whether or not the decision was right, I could see this going differently with another panelist.  That&#8217;s why this is so frustrating &#8212; inconsistency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrico S.</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/02/bill-clinton-loses-domain-name-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-417400</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrico S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6639#comment-417400</guid>
		<description>I did a complete analysis of this decision here. 

http://tinyurl.com/quabm9 

It was wrongly decided, in my estimation. How would you like it if someone registered your name and pointed it to an abortion, or anti-abortion, web site seeking to raise money?  Would people think you were endorsing the site to which you were re-directing? Of course.  Is the RNC web site commercial?  Of course it is. Was the registrant trying to leverage Clinton&#039;s fame for his own purposes and to cause confusion?  Of course. 

DS:  You are right that advertisements on the site would have been a clincher.  But the RNC web site ids designed to raise money. It is really the same thing. 

I think this one is out of bounds, a bad decision and simply causes confusion among domainers about what business models are risky, or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did a complete analysis of this decision here. </p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/quabm9" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/quabm9</a> </p>
<p>It was wrongly decided, in my estimation. How would you like it if someone registered your name and pointed it to an abortion, or anti-abortion, web site seeking to raise money?  Would people think you were endorsing the site to which you were re-directing? Of course.  Is the RNC web site commercial?  Of course it is. Was the registrant trying to leverage Clinton&#8217;s fame for his own purposes and to cause confusion?  Of course. </p>
<p>DS:  You are right that advertisements on the site would have been a clincher.  But the RNC web site ids designed to raise money. It is really the same thing. </p>
<p>I think this one is out of bounds, a bad decision and simply causes confusion among domainers about what business models are risky, or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SCartierLiebel</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/02/bill-clinton-loses-domain-name-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-530116</link>
		<dc:creator>SCartierLiebel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6639#comment-530116</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @econwriter5: Whoa. RT @vpynchon: RT @InternetLaw: “Bill Clinton Loses Domain Name Challenge” http://tinyurl.com/qp96es&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @econwriter5: Whoa. RT @vpynchon: RT @InternetLaw: “Bill Clinton Loses Domain Name Challenge” <a href="http://tinyurl.com/qp96es" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/qp96es</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vpynchon</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/02/bill-clinton-loses-domain-name-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-530117</link>
		<dc:creator>vpynchon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6639#comment-530117</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @InternetLaw: “Bill Clinton Loses Domain Name Challenge” http://tinyurl.com/qp96es&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @InternetLaw: “Bill Clinton Loses Domain Name Challenge” <a href="http://tinyurl.com/qp96es" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/qp96es</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InternetLaw</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/02/bill-clinton-loses-domain-name-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-530118</link>
		<dc:creator>InternetLaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6639#comment-530118</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;“Bill Clinton Loses Domain Name Challenge” http://tinyurl.com/qp96es&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">“Bill Clinton Loses Domain Name Challenge” <a href="http://tinyurl.com/qp96es" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/qp96es</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the.LIFE Files - &#8220;Welcome To Exclusiveness&#8221; : Bill Clinton Loses His Bid To Get Presidentbillclinton.com, Williamjclinton.com And Pretty Much Anything Else He Would Want&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/02/bill-clinton-loses-domain-name-challenge/comment-page-1/#comment-416954</link>
		<dc:creator>the.LIFE Files - &#8220;Welcome To Exclusiveness&#8221; : Bill Clinton Loses His Bid To Get Presidentbillclinton.com, Williamjclinton.com And Pretty Much Anything Else He Would Want&#8230;.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6639#comment-416954</guid>
		<description>[...] the Republican National Committee site.  Long story short, Bill took them to court they told him some legal mumbo jumbo and he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] the Republican National Committee site.  Long story short, Bill took them to court they told him some legal mumbo jumbo and he [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

