<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arbitrator Says Complainant Harassed Domain Owner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/02/arbitrator-says-complainant-harassed-domain-owner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/02/arbitrator-says-complainant-harassed-domain-owner/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:51:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Sequin</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/02/arbitrator-says-complainant-harassed-domain-owner/comment-page-1/#comment-416690</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Sequin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6634#comment-416690</guid>
		<description>At least La France corp now has this article to publicly shame them for all time as it should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least La France corp now has this article to publicly shame them for all time as it should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Doe</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/02/arbitrator-says-complainant-harassed-domain-owner/comment-page-1/#comment-416504</link>
		<dc:creator>John Doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6634#comment-416504</guid>
		<description>ICANN should have never legitamized those arbitrators, I cannot believe it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ICANN should have never legitamized those arbitrators, I cannot believe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/02/arbitrator-says-complainant-harassed-domain-owner/comment-page-1/#comment-416474</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6634#comment-416474</guid>
		<description>You couldn&#039;t make this stuff up if you tried. Incredible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You couldn&#8217;t make this stuff up if you tried. Incredible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UDRPtalk</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/02/arbitrator-says-complainant-harassed-domain-owner/comment-page-1/#comment-416254</link>
		<dc:creator>UDRPtalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6634#comment-416254</guid>
		<description>Why should it make any difference whether complainant used an attorney or not?

Harassment implies (RDNH) Hijacking, pure and simple.

The panelist can&#039;t have it both ways. 

Absolutely outrageous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should it make any difference whether complainant used an attorney or not?</p>
<p>Harassment implies (RDNH) Hijacking, pure and simple.</p>
<p>The panelist can&#8217;t have it both ways. </p>
<p>Absolutely outrageous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/02/arbitrator-says-complainant-harassed-domain-owner/comment-page-1/#comment-416198</link>
		<dc:creator>K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6634#comment-416198</guid>
		<description>&quot;I guess if you’re ignorant of the rules then you haven’t done anything wrong.&quot; DNW

- Let&#039;s see them try that in Federal court. &quot;Ignorance&quot; of the law will not be considered with regards to willful or malicious actions and intentions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I guess if you’re ignorant of the rules then you haven’t done anything wrong.&#8221; DNW</p>
<p>- Let&#8217;s see them try that in Federal court. &#8220;Ignorance&#8221; of the law will not be considered with regards to willful or malicious actions and intentions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/02/arbitrator-says-complainant-harassed-domain-owner/comment-page-1/#comment-416194</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6634#comment-416194</guid>
		<description>The logic used across the board across the domain channel authorities is both fascinating and very scary.  Not nearly enough checks and balances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The logic used across the board across the domain channel authorities is both fascinating and very scary.  Not nearly enough checks and balances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/02/arbitrator-says-complainant-harassed-domain-owner/comment-page-1/#comment-416193</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6634#comment-416193</guid>
		<description>Crazy days!  It&#039;s still like the Wild West out there some 14 years after the Internet began to truly commercialize.

&quot;The interests&quot; are keeping all domain owners in firing range for their own financial gains....ICANN, NAF, WIPO, and trademark groups are all for raping the domain owners if it fills their pockets with gold and assets. Where are the protections for domain owners being exercised by these panelists?  I never see it anymore hardly.  

These groups have a bad case of avarice.  It&#039;s all about THEM making money, not protecting domain owners. What comes around goes around....karma .....ya&#039; know!  Wait until the DOJ or DOC gives them another boot like they already did.  Maybe a class action suit eventually.  Who knows?  I would not rule anything out because the domain battles are starting to look like they are escalating into an all-out domain wars for domain owner&#039;s property. A breaking point will come soon....too much at stake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crazy days!  It&#8217;s still like the Wild West out there some 14 years after the Internet began to truly commercialize.</p>
<p>&#8220;The interests&#8221; are keeping all domain owners in firing range for their own financial gains&#8230;.ICANN, NAF, WIPO, and trademark groups are all for raping the domain owners if it fills their pockets with gold and assets. Where are the protections for domain owners being exercised by these panelists?  I never see it anymore hardly.  </p>
<p>These groups have a bad case of avarice.  It&#8217;s all about THEM making money, not protecting domain owners. What comes around goes around&#8230;.karma &#8230;..ya&#8217; know!  Wait until the DOJ or DOC gives them another boot like they already did.  Maybe a class action suit eventually.  Who knows?  I would not rule anything out because the domain battles are starting to look like they are escalating into an all-out domain wars for domain owner&#8217;s property. A breaking point will come soon&#8230;.too much at stake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
