<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Goes Clubbing with Bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/01/microsoft-goes-clubbing-with-bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/01/microsoft-goes-clubbing-with-bing/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tan Tran</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/01/microsoft-goes-clubbing-with-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-418759</link>
		<dc:creator>Tan Tran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6607#comment-418759</guid>
		<description>I for one think they made the right move by getting clubbing.com vs. bingclub.com.

I can tell you from a psychological perspective, it is alot easier to get &#039;clubbing&#039; than &#039;bingclub&#039; into the minds of people.  It comes down to how many times the name must be used in order for it to be &#039;ingrained&#039; in the individual&#039;s mind.  With &#039;clubbing&#039; the name already has meaning so changing the association from &#039;clubbing&#039; to &#039;club bing&#039; is easier to remember.  Whereas, I bet 2 months from now, you probably would not even remember &#039;bing club&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one think they made the right move by getting clubbing.com vs. bingclub.com.</p>
<p>I can tell you from a psychological perspective, it is alot easier to get &#8216;clubbing&#8217; than &#8216;bingclub&#8217; into the minds of people.  It comes down to how many times the name must be used in order for it to be &#8216;ingrained&#8217; in the individual&#8217;s mind.  With &#8216;clubbing&#8217; the name already has meaning so changing the association from &#8216;clubbing&#8217; to &#8216;club bing&#8217; is easier to remember.  Whereas, I bet 2 months from now, you probably would not even remember &#8216;bing club&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/01/microsoft-goes-clubbing-with-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-416761</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6607#comment-416761</guid>
		<description>I just found out that Microsoft used to have &quot;Club Live&quot; at club.live.com, so perhaps they wanted to keep the same sort of stucture.

Interestingly, MS hasn&#039;t forwarded club.bing.com to clubbing.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just found out that Microsoft used to have &#8220;Club Live&#8221; at club.live.com, so perhaps they wanted to keep the same sort of stucture.</p>
<p>Interestingly, MS hasn&#8217;t forwarded club.bing.com to clubbing.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/01/microsoft-goes-clubbing-with-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-415992</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6607#comment-415992</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;If thatâ€™s your logic, then why pay xxx for any domain when you can register a domain for under $10 at Godaddy&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

I think his point was that Clubbing.com isn&#039;t a great domain for what the site is; it has a much better use as something else.  So they could have spent a lot less for a different domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8220;If thatâ€™s your logic, then why pay xxx for any domain when you can register a domain for under $10 at Godaddy&#8221;</em></p>
<p>I think his point was that Clubbing.com isn&#8217;t a great domain for what the site is; it has a much better use as something else.  So they could have spent a lot less for a different domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/01/microsoft-goes-clubbing-with-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-415703</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 03:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6607#comment-415703</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t get it. Why are we supposed to care about bing? What magical thing is bing going to do for us? I still say search results look like a 1 click lander at a parking company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t get it. Why are we supposed to care about bing? What magical thing is bing going to do for us? I still say search results look like a 1 click lander at a parking company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: At the Previous Post</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/01/microsoft-goes-clubbing-with-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-415685</link>
		<dc:creator>At the Previous Post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 03:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6607#comment-415685</guid>
		<description>If that&#039;s your logic, then why pay xxx for any domain when you can register a domain for under $10 at Godaddy. If MS, a large million dollar company doesn&#039;t see the value in a generic .com then no one will. Lucky for domainers, they do care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that&#8217;s your logic, then why pay xxx for any domain when you can register a domain for under $10 at Godaddy. If MS, a large million dollar company doesn&#8217;t see the value in a generic .com then no one will. Lucky for domainers, they do care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UDRPtalk</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/01/microsoft-goes-clubbing-with-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-415475</link>
		<dc:creator>UDRPtalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6607#comment-415475</guid>
		<description>Why choose CLUBBING.COM when they could have chosen a different name for a hand reg fee?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why choose CLUBBING.COM when they could have chosen a different name for a hand reg fee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latest Domainer News</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/01/microsoft-goes-clubbing-with-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-530209</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest Domainer News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 20:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6607#comment-530209</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Microsoft Goes Clubbing with Bing - http://tinyurl.com/maxsjt&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Microsoft Goes Clubbing with Bing &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/maxsjt" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/maxsjt</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

