<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlackBerry Wins 101 Domain Names in Single UDRP Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/28/blackberry-wins-101-domain-names-in-single-udrp-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/28/blackberry-wins-101-domain-names-in-single-udrp-case/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:47:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stumble</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/28/blackberry-wins-101-domain-names-in-single-udrp-case/comment-page-1/#comment-526160</link>
		<dc:creator>stumble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6531#comment-526160</guid>
		<description>ha ha some one busted :D 

so what abt godaddy fees do they really got 3K from that domainer/s ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha ha some one busted <img src='http://domainnamewire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>so what abt godaddy fees do they really got 3K from that domainer/s ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can I use Blackberry in my domain??</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/28/blackberry-wins-101-domain-names-in-single-udrp-case/comment-page-1/#comment-439125</link>
		<dc:creator>Can I use Blackberry in my domain??</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6531#comment-439125</guid>
		<description>[...] News, ICANN News, Registry News, Domainer News, Domain WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2006-1099 Domain Name Wire News BlackBerry Wins 101 Domain Names in Single UDRP Case - The Domain Industry&#039;s N... WIPO Domain Name Dispute: Case No. D2008.-0758  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] News, ICANN News, Registry News, Domainer News, Domain WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2006-1099 Domain Name Wire News BlackBerry Wins 101 Domain Names in Single UDRP Case &#8211; The Domain Industry&#8217;s N&#8230; WIPO Domain Name Dispute: Case No. D2008.-0758  [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/28/blackberry-wins-101-domain-names-in-single-udrp-case/comment-page-1/#comment-428046</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6531#comment-428046</guid>
		<description>Regardless of the trademark rights I am really surprised they can file a bulk case for more than 100 names and pay just one fee. What a bargain that is!

It seems to me each case should stand on its own with its own cost for filing, especially if the trademark issue is not the same which appears to be so with 10 of the domains judging by the ruling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of the trademark rights I am really surprised they can file a bulk case for more than 100 names and pay just one fee. What a bargain that is!</p>
<p>It seems to me each case should stand on its own with its own cost for filing, especially if the trademark issue is not the same which appears to be so with 10 of the domains judging by the ruling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HOT! The Story of how RIM Got www.InsideBlackBerry.com for Their Official Blog &#124; BerryReview.com &#187;</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/28/blackberry-wins-101-domain-names-in-single-udrp-case/comment-page-1/#comment-420738</link>
		<dc:creator>HOT! The Story of how RIM Got www.InsideBlackBerry.com for Their Official Blog &#124; BerryReview.com &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6531#comment-420738</guid>
		<description>[...] won 101 names that have BlackBerry in them and lost the 10 names that had just Berry according to DomainNameWire. Looks like RIM really does own the word [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] won 101 names that have BlackBerry in them and lost the 10 names that had just Berry according to DomainNameWire. Looks like RIM really does own the word [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week&#8217;s Favorite Links - May 29, 2009 - Blog.WSG.net</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/28/blackberry-wins-101-domain-names-in-single-udrp-case/comment-page-1/#comment-413987</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week&#8217;s Favorite Links - May 29, 2009 - Blog.WSG.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 02:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6531#comment-413987</guid>
		<description>[...] BlackBerry Wins 101 Domain Names in Single Case (Domain Name Wire) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] BlackBerry Wins 101 Domain Names in Single Case (Domain Name Wire) [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/28/blackberry-wins-101-domain-names-in-single-udrp-case/comment-page-1/#comment-413752</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6531#comment-413752</guid>
		<description>The last paragraph of this article was amended slightly to clarify that Elias made this allegation, but the arbitration panel did not consider it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last paragraph of this article was amended slightly to clarify that Elias made this allegation, but the arbitration panel did not consider it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mario</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/28/blackberry-wins-101-domain-names-in-single-udrp-case/comment-page-1/#comment-413738</link>
		<dc:creator>mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6531#comment-413738</guid>
		<description>what if you have a URL with the word blackberry as one of two total words, is there a way of writing a disclaimer saying the domain is Not related to that company?
would that &quot;release your domain&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what if you have a URL with the word blackberry as one of two total words, is there a way of writing a disclaimer saying the domain is Not related to that company?<br />
would that &#8220;release your domain&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
