<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weblo Files Patent for Virtual Domain Names</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/21/weblo-files-patent-for-virtual-domain-names/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/21/weblo-files-patent-for-virtual-domain-names/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:35:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Berryhill</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/21/weblo-files-patent-for-virtual-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-410548</link>
		<dc:creator>John Berryhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 05:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6446#comment-410548</guid>
		<description>JP, you are not alone in not &quot;getting&quot; Weblo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JP, you are not alone in not &#8220;getting&#8221; Weblo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/21/weblo-files-patent-for-virtual-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-409298</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 00:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6446#comment-409298</guid>
		<description>These guys have been around for a while now. I ran across them first a few years ago. I don&#039;t get it, but they must have made some money on something if they&#039;ve kept it up this long.

Still, I don&#039;t get it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These guys have been around for a while now. I ran across them first a few years ago. I don&#8217;t get it, but they must have made some money on something if they&#8217;ve kept it up this long.</p>
<p>Still, I don&#8217;t get it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Another Silly Patent Application: 104 Domains - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/21/weblo-files-patent-for-virtual-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-409036</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Another Silly Patent Application: 104 Domains - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 14:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6446#comment-409036</guid>
		<description>[...] Articles Another Silly Patent Application: 104 DomainsWeblo Files Patent for Virtual Domain NamesFinancial Firm Loses Bid for OVB.com.Tel Hits 200,000 Registrations.Me at 250,000: What&#039;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Articles Another Silly Patent Application: 104 DomainsWeblo Files Patent for Virtual Domain NamesFinancial Firm Loses Bid for OVB.com.Tel Hits 200,000 Registrations.Me at 250,000: What&#8217;s [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

