Comments on: National Arbitration Forum’s Surprise Response to IRT http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/06/national-arbitration-forums-surprise-response-to-irt/ News and Views for the Domain Name Industry Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:35:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Jeffery Cockburn http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/06/national-arbitration-forums-surprise-response-to-irt/comment-page-1/#comment-402288 Jeffery Cockburn Fri, 08 May 2009 17:28:22 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6151#comment-402288 QUOTE, NAF letter May 6, 2009: 'The Forum invites the IRT and ICANN to contact its Internet Legal Counsel, Kristine Dorrain, who manages the domain name dispute department for the National Arbitration Forum, should either group wish to find out more about the Forum’s position on these or other matters, or for thoughts from our many years of experience as a dispute resolution provider under the UDRP.' I for one would be interested to know about the position, thoughts and other matters. Anyone REGISTERING a domain should be interested. QUOTE, NAF letter May 6, 2009:

‘The Forum invites
the IRT and ICANN to contact its Internet Legal Counsel, Kristine Dorrain, who
manages the domain name dispute department for the National Arbitration Forum, should
either group wish to find out more about the Forum’s position on these or other matters,
or for thoughts from our many years of experience as a dispute resolution provider under
the UDRP.’

I for one would be interested to know about the position, thoughts and other matters. Anyone REGISTERING a domain should be interested.

]]> By: Steve M http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/06/national-arbitration-forums-surprise-response-to-irt/comment-page-1/#comment-401681 Steve M Thu, 07 May 2009 19:14:02 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6151#comment-401681 Hint: We'd all be wise to use their own argument against questionable filings in any "cases" we're involved in: "...it’s clear that the UDRP was not designed to deal with any situation where a Respondent might possibly have a claim to the domain name." Hint: We’d all be wise to use their own argument against questionable filings in any “cases” we’re involved in: “…it’s clear that the UDRP was not designed to deal with any situation where a Respondent might possibly have a claim to the domain name.”

]]> By: Johnny http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/06/national-arbitration-forums-surprise-response-to-irt/comment-page-1/#comment-401586 Johnny Thu, 07 May 2009 15:46:15 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6151#comment-401586 Wait a second....I did not think my thought through very well. It's the NAF that approves whether they will even take a case or not, so why are they letting bogus cases pass on through to the panelists for a decision, and now saying that the process is getting abused? They have the ability to control this abuse, right? Wait a second….I did not think my thought through very well.

It’s the NAF that approves whether they will even take a case or not, so why are they letting bogus cases pass on through to the panelists for a decision, and now saying that the process is getting abused? They have the ability to control this abuse, right?

]]> By: Johnny http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/06/national-arbitration-forums-surprise-response-to-irt/comment-page-1/#comment-401584 Johnny Thu, 07 May 2009 15:44:05 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6151#comment-401584 Wow.....it looks like they are calling a spade a spade. It's nice to see this for a change and restors some of my confidence in NAF, at least the body, but not the panelists. Wow…..it looks like they are calling a spade a spade.

It’s nice to see this for a change and restors some of my confidence in NAF, at least the body, but not the panelists.

]]> By: Latest Domainer News http://domainnamewire.com/2009/05/06/national-arbitration-forums-surprise-response-to-irt/comment-page-1/#comment-529592 Latest Domainer News Thu, 07 May 2009 02:13:04 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6151#comment-529592 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">National Arbitration Forum?s Surprise Response to IRT - http://tinyurl.com/cg2aad</span></span>

National Arbitration Forum?s Surprise Response to IRT – http://tinyurl.com/cg2aad

]]>