<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GoDaddy Disses .TV and What it Says About the Echo Chamber</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/30/godaddy-disses-tv-and-what-it-says-about-the-echo-chamber/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/30/godaddy-disses-tv-and-what-it-says-about-the-echo-chamber/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:25:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Official Tech News &#187; GoDaddy Tells Us Not to Buy .TV Domains Because Tuvalu Is Sinking? [Internet]</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/30/godaddy-disses-tv-and-what-it-says-about-the-echo-chamber/comment-page-1/#comment-418034</link>
		<dc:creator>Official Tech News &#187; GoDaddy Tells Us Not to Buy .TV Domains Because Tuvalu Is Sinking? [Internet]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6051#comment-418034</guid>
		<description>[...] are exceptons&#8212;.su domains from the old Soviet Union are still active. But DomainNameWire refutes this, mentioning that factoid came from a VeriSign, a company that handles all domain transactions for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] are exceptons&mdash;.su domains from the old Soviet Union are still active. But DomainNameWire refutes this, mentioning that factoid came from a VeriSign, a company that handles all domain transactions for [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoDaddy Tells Us Not to Buy .TV Domains Because Tuvalu Is Sinking? [Internet]</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/30/godaddy-disses-tv-and-what-it-says-about-the-echo-chamber/comment-page-1/#comment-402775</link>
		<dc:creator>GoDaddy Tells Us Not to Buy .TV Domains Because Tuvalu Is Sinking? [Internet]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 15:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6051#comment-402775</guid>
		<description>[...] are exceptons&#8212;.su domains from the old Soviet Union are still active. But DomainNameWire refutes this, mentioning that factoid came from a VeriSign, a company that handles all domain transactions for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] are exceptons&mdash;.su domains from the old Soviet Union are still active. But DomainNameWire refutes this, mentioning that factoid came from a VeriSign, a company that handles all domain transactions for [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Miller</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/30/godaddy-disses-tv-and-what-it-says-about-the-echo-chamber/comment-page-1/#comment-398948</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 02:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6051#comment-398948</guid>
		<description>This has nothing to do the a sinking island country and it&#039;s Top Level Domains! This is pure strong arming tactics by Go Daddy to most likely squeeze out a better wholesale deal with the .TV Registry and tick off Verisign, the .TV Registry. The &quot;level&quot; of this country sinking is nothing new, so why NOW? 

Public service for Go Daddy&#039;s customers? I think not. Go Daddy had NO problem selling  .TV domains at $29.99, then $24.99, then $19.99, then $14.99... ect. Now it&#039;s $39.99 and NOW there is a problem with the ccTLD? No, it&#039;s that Parsons is NOT getting a sweet deal and to SHOW the .TV people, he&#039;s dished the domain extension and hijacked the price $39.99.        

If Go Daddy was JUST looking out for it&#039;s customers, they SHOULD disclaim their OWN domain extension .ME - The country of Montenegro has changed so much, that is has had no less then 3 domain extensions in the past 5 years. .YU, .CS (that was NEVER used) and now .ME.. what&#039;s next?

Why would we believe that Montenegro is going to be around any longer then when Tuvalu sinks. Most likely it&#039;s not, then again &quot;This has nothing to do the a sinking island country&quot;. Don&#039;t try to fool us Parsons we know your game. The only one that is getting screwed it THEIR own customers, that paid $14.99 for .TV a year ago and NOW have to pay $39.99 to renew. 

Wait, didn&#039;t Parsons go off any of his blog a while back about Yahoo hijacking their domain prices from $9.99 to $34.99? He claimed Go Daddy just won&#039;t do that? Well look now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has nothing to do the a sinking island country and it&#8217;s Top Level Domains! This is pure strong arming tactics by Go Daddy to most likely squeeze out a better wholesale deal with the .TV Registry and tick off Verisign, the .TV Registry. The &#8220;level&#8221; of this country sinking is nothing new, so why NOW? </p>
<p>Public service for Go Daddy&#8217;s customers? I think not. Go Daddy had NO problem selling  .TV domains at $29.99, then $24.99, then $19.99, then $14.99&#8230; ect. Now it&#8217;s $39.99 and NOW there is a problem with the ccTLD? No, it&#8217;s that Parsons is NOT getting a sweet deal and to SHOW the .TV people, he&#8217;s dished the domain extension and hijacked the price $39.99.        </p>
<p>If Go Daddy was JUST looking out for it&#8217;s customers, they SHOULD disclaim their OWN domain extension .ME &#8211; The country of Montenegro has changed so much, that is has had no less then 3 domain extensions in the past 5 years. .YU, .CS (that was NEVER used) and now .ME.. what&#8217;s next?</p>
<p>Why would we believe that Montenegro is going to be around any longer then when Tuvalu sinks. Most likely it&#8217;s not, then again &#8220;This has nothing to do the a sinking island country&#8221;. Don&#8217;t try to fool us Parsons we know your game. The only one that is getting screwed it THEIR own customers, that paid $14.99 for .TV a year ago and NOW have to pay $39.99 to renew. </p>
<p>Wait, didn&#8217;t Parsons go off any of his blog a while back about Yahoo hijacking their domain prices from $9.99 to $34.99? He claimed Go Daddy just won&#8217;t do that? Well look now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magazine of e - The Online Internet and Technology magazine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GoDaddy Tells Us Not to Buy .TV Domains Because Tuvalu Is Sinking?</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/30/godaddy-disses-tv-and-what-it-says-about-the-echo-chamber/comment-page-1/#comment-398243</link>
		<dc:creator>Magazine of e - The Online Internet and Technology magazine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GoDaddy Tells Us Not to Buy .TV Domains Because Tuvalu Is Sinking?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 05:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6051#comment-398243</guid>
		<description>[...] there are exceptons—.su domains from the old Soviet Union are still active. But DomainNameWire refutes this, mentioning that factoid came from a VeriSign, a company that handles all domain transactions for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] there are exceptons—.su domains from the old Soviet Union are still active. But DomainNameWire refutes this, mentioning that factoid came from a VeriSign, a company that handles all domain transactions for [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .tv ... going down ? - webhostingtalk.nl</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/30/godaddy-disses-tv-and-what-it-says-about-the-echo-chamber/comment-page-1/#comment-397429</link>
		<dc:creator>.tv ... going down ? - webhostingtalk.nl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 07:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6051#comment-397429</guid>
		<description>[...] de huidige regels gewoon opgeheven worden.  Zelfde geldt voor .nl, enz.  Zie dit stukkie text: http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/30...-echo-chamber/   __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] de huidige regels gewoon opgeheven worden.  Zelfde geldt voor .nl, enz.  Zie dit stukkie text: <a href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/30...-echo-chamber/" rel="nofollow">http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/30&#8230;-echo-chamber/</a>   __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Haastrup-Timmi</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/30/godaddy-disses-tv-and-what-it-says-about-the-echo-chamber/comment-page-1/#comment-397229</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Haastrup-Timmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 02:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6051#comment-397229</guid>
		<description>If .TV ever goes down, then Godaddy will have to refund me for every registration plus site development costs. 

But like I said, it&#039;s so unlikely, it&#039;s not even funny!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If .TV ever goes down, then Godaddy will have to refund me for every registration plus site development costs. </p>
<p>But like I said, it&#8217;s so unlikely, it&#8217;s not even funny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Laureate</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/30/godaddy-disses-tv-and-what-it-says-about-the-echo-chamber/comment-page-1/#comment-396833</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Laureate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 18:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6051#comment-396833</guid>
		<description>if this domain can really go away, and it is a bad idea to buy, then ethically speaking, why does godaddy continue to sell it???  maybe it&#039;s time for a bit of poetic justice ;) http://web-poet.com/2009/05/01/godaddy/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if this domain can really go away, and it is a bad idea to buy, then ethically speaking, why does godaddy continue to sell it???  maybe it&#8217;s time for a bit of poetic justice <img src='http://domainnamewire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  <a href="http://web-poet.com/2009/05/01/godaddy/" rel="nofollow">http://web-poet.com/2009/05/01/godaddy/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
