<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intellectual Property Group Suggests Protections for New Domains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/27/intellectual-property-group-suggests-protections-for-new-domains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/27/intellectual-property-group-suggests-protections-for-new-domains/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:15:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Trademark Group Pushes Rapid Domain Takedown Scheme - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/27/intellectual-property-group-suggests-protections-for-new-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-414991</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Trademark Group Pushes Rapid Domain Takedown Scheme - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 01:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5980#comment-414991</guid>
		<description>[...] Forum) can handle both URS and UDRP cases. The first draft of the report recommended that the URS provider must be different since it would create a conflict of interest as UDRP cases pay much more than URS. This would kill [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Forum) can handle both URS and UDRP cases. The first draft of the report recommended that the URS provider must be different since it would create a conflict of interest as UDRP cases pay much more than URS. This would kill [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; National Arbitration Forum&#8217;s Surprise Response to IRT - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/27/intellectual-property-group-suggests-protections-for-new-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-401337</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; National Arbitration Forum&#8217;s Surprise Response to IRT - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 02:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5980#comment-401337</guid>
		<description>[...] Suspension System (URSS), a fast-track UDRP-like process, comes as no surprise. After all, it would destroy 90% of NAF&#8217;s and World Intellectual Property Organization&#8217;s domain dispute busin.... But NAF went above and beyond in comments to ICANN about URSS, suggesting that perhaps UDRP has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Suspension System (URSS), a fast-track UDRP-like process, comes as no surprise. After all, it would destroy 90% of NAF&#8217;s and World Intellectual Property Organization&#8217;s domain dispute busin&#8230;. But NAF went above and beyond in comments to ICANN about URSS, suggesting that perhaps UDRP has [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/27/intellectual-property-group-suggests-protections-for-new-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-394441</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5980#comment-394441</guid>
		<description>Good point Kevin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Kevin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Ohashi</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/27/intellectual-property-group-suggests-protections-for-new-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-394132</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Ohashi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5980#comment-394132</guid>
		<description>What about something like United (airlines)?  Apple (computers)?  I suspect there are some quite strong rights holders using generic words...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about something like United (airlines)?  Apple (computers)?  I suspect there are some quite strong rights holders using generic words&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

