Comments on: A Wacky Domain Dispute in Orange County http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/20/a-wacky-domain-dispute-in-orange-county/ News and Views for the Domain Name Industry Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:50:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: domain guy http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/20/a-wacky-domain-dispute-in-orange-county/comment-page-1/#comment-388687 domain guy Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:59:19 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5882#comment-388687 the domain name differs from the mark by only adding letters.this is a federal court case stating liklihood of confusion not a udrp arbitration.in federal court surveys are needed to show public confusion. it is not only numbers there is also a design element added or deleted words different spellings.this could be a signficant legal point by the arbitrator these arbitrators are versed in trademark law.this arbitrator is stating a fact in a federal court trademark case not a simple watered down udrp arbitration case.this is why in trademark law prima facie evidence of what mark is first on the principal register is a big deal. again this is why domainers need to do their own trademark legal work..so how is mike bergins doing after ari took his money and now bergins lost? the domain name differs from the mark by only adding letters.this is a federal court case stating liklihood of confusion not a udrp arbitration.in federal court surveys are needed to show public confusion. it is not only numbers there is also a design element added or deleted words different spellings.this could be a signficant legal point by the arbitrator these arbitrators are versed in trademark law.this arbitrator is stating a fact in a federal court trademark case not a simple watered down udrp arbitration case.this is why in trademark law prima facie evidence of what mark is first on the principal register is a big deal. again this is why domainers need to do their own trademark legal work..so how is mike bergins doing after ari took his money and now bergins lost?

]]> By: Andrew Allemann http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/20/a-wacky-domain-dispute-in-orange-county/comment-page-1/#comment-388579 Andrew Allemann Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:28:25 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5882#comment-388579 @ Krispy - one thing I've learned from reading both submissions to the panel and the panelist's summary is that sometimes complex arguments can be simplified too much. I don't want to assume the complainant wrote these exact words, but I don't want to assume the panelist over simplified it. That's why I said "perhaps..." @ Krispy – one thing I’ve learned from reading both submissions to the panel and the panelist’s summary is that sometimes complex arguments can be simplified too much. I don’t want to assume the complainant wrote these exact words, but I don’t want to assume the panelist over simplified it. That’s why I said “perhaps…”

]]> By: Krispy http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/20/a-wacky-domain-dispute-in-orange-county/comment-page-1/#comment-388206 Krispy Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:57:08 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5882#comment-388206 ummm.. why are you blaming the panelists for the wording of the compainant for arguing 'domain name differs from a mark by only adding letters' You are incorrectly pointing the finger at the panelist/arbitrator for working this but is clearly saying 'Complainant argues' .. therefore he is only quoting, not summarising in his/her own words...?? explain?? ummm.. why are you blaming the panelists for the wording of the compainant for arguing ‘domain name differs from a mark by only adding letters’

You are incorrectly pointing the finger at the panelist/arbitrator for working this but is clearly saying ‘Complainant argues’ .. therefore he is only quoting, not summarising in his/her own words…?? explain??

]]> By: Latest Domainer News http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/20/a-wacky-domain-dispute-in-orange-county/comment-page-1/#comment-529534 Latest Domainer News Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:13:04 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5882#comment-529534 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">A Wacky Domain Dispute in Orange County - http://tinyurl.com/cz45z4</span></span>

A Wacky Domain Dispute in Orange County – http://tinyurl.com/cz45z4

]]> By: DS http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/20/a-wacky-domain-dispute-in-orange-county/comment-page-1/#comment-388144 DS Tue, 21 Apr 2009 02:46:59 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5882#comment-388144 And once again the complainant of another WIPO case, is officially retarded. And once again the complainant of another WIPO case, is officially retarded.

]]>