<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hewlett-Packard Wants .HP Domain Name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/16/hewlett-packard-wants-hp-domain-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/16/hewlett-packard-wants-hp-domain-name/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: P&#38;G and HP Say They Won&#8217;t Register Their Own TLDs - Domain Name Wire</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/16/hewlett-packard-wants-hp-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-1292468</link>
		<dc:creator>P&#38;G and HP Say They Won&#8217;t Register Their Own TLDs - Domain Name Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 12:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5794#comment-1292468</guid>
		<description>[...] extensions are ineligible. .PG and .HP are only two letters; they must be three. HP has already complained about this to ICANN. Oh, and .pg is already delegated to Papua New [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] extensions are ineligible. .PG and .HP are only two letters; they must be three. HP has already complained about this to ICANN. Oh, and .pg is already delegated to Papua New [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/16/hewlett-packard-wants-hp-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-385249</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5794#comment-385249</guid>
		<description>All things being equal, if the new tld of .hp was granted it would be a competitive advantage that ICANN made an &quot;exception&quot; for.  It would be an exception for an advantage.

Bring the noise. &quot;Let the games begin&quot; as David said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All things being equal, if the new tld of .hp was granted it would be a competitive advantage that ICANN made an &#8220;exception&#8221; for.  It would be an exception for an advantage.</p>
<p>Bring the noise. &#8220;Let the games begin&#8221; as David said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HP Requests Exception to ICANN Rule &#171; Disputing</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/16/hewlett-packard-wants-hp-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-385214</link>
		<dc:creator>HP Requests Exception to ICANN Rule &#171; Disputing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5794#comment-385214</guid>
		<description>[...] claims that the rule puts HP in a disadvantaged position against its competitors, like IBM. See: Hewlett-Packard Wants .HP Domain Name at the Domain [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] claims that the rule puts HP in a disadvantaged position against its competitors, like IBM. See: Hewlett-Packard Wants .HP Domain Name at the Domain [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gpmgroup</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/16/hewlett-packard-wants-hp-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-385112</link>
		<dc:creator>gpmgroup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5794#comment-385112</guid>
		<description>If ICANN is going to allow .dell and .ibm it will be interesting to see how they handle letting Hewlett Packard have .hp

Changing to a new brand to meet ICANN&#039;s naming rules would require a serious rebranding exercise the cost of which would make ICANN&#039;s $185,000 + $25,000 a year pale into insignificance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If ICANN is going to allow .dell and .ibm it will be interesting to see how they handle letting Hewlett Packard have .hp</p>
<p>Changing to a new brand to meet ICANN&#8217;s naming rules would require a serious rebranding exercise the cost of which would make ICANN&#8217;s $185,000 + $25,000 a year pale into insignificance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/16/hewlett-packard-wants-hp-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-385048</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5794#comment-385048</guid>
		<description>... um, yea sure ... an&#039; Target is insisting on getting &quot;.T&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; um, yea sure &#8230; an&#8217; Target is insisting on getting &#8220;.T&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/16/hewlett-packard-wants-hp-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-384986</link>
		<dc:creator>C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5794#comment-384986</guid>
		<description>&#039;Why would anyone need .hp?&#039;

Hell, why would anyone *need* a gTLD? It also seems the majority of all companies or markets are wanting &#039;exceptions&#039; to the proposed layout.

I hope ICANN is feeling the pressure from these blunders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Why would anyone need .hp?&#8217;</p>
<p>Hell, why would anyone *need* a gTLD? It also seems the majority of all companies or markets are wanting &#8216;exceptions&#8217; to the proposed layout.</p>
<p>I hope ICANN is feeling the pressure from these blunders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: domain finder</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/16/hewlett-packard-wants-hp-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-384979</link>
		<dc:creator>domain finder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5794#comment-384979</guid>
		<description>if these are the rules, i think that will be it not unless if hp will find a way to make them break the rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if these are the rules, i think that will be it not unless if hp will find a way to make them break the rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

