<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Resounding Opposition to New Top Level Domains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/14/resounding-opposition-to-new-top-level-domains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/14/resounding-opposition-to-new-top-level-domains/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:15:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nowinki &#187; Should ICANN Dump The Idea Of Generic Top Level Domains?</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/14/resounding-opposition-to-new-top-level-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-419335</link>
		<dc:creator>Nowinki &#187; Should ICANN Dump The Idea Of Generic Top Level Domains?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 07:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5745#comment-419335</guid>
		<description>[...] again, it was all about the money grab, rather than anything useful.  However, with overwhelming opposition to the idea of super high priced generic TLDs, ICANN has delayed the entire project and some are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] again, it was all about the money grab, rather than anything useful.  However, with overwhelming opposition to the idea of super high priced generic TLDs, ICANN has delayed the entire project and some are [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; ICA Asks ICANN Ombudsman for Investigation - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/14/resounding-opposition-to-new-top-level-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-390320</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; ICA Asks ICANN Ombudsman for Investigation - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5745#comment-390320</guid>
		<description>[...] generic domain names. For example, Hearst Corporation, publisher of Cosmopolitan magazine, has notified ICANN that it believes it should hold all rights to any second level domain name &#8220;Cosmo&#8221; or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] generic domain names. For example, Hearst Corporation, publisher of Cosmopolitan magazine, has notified ICANN that it believes it should hold all rights to any second level domain name &#8220;Cosmo&#8221; or [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Verizon Voices Concerns about New Top Level Domain Names - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/14/resounding-opposition-to-new-top-level-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-389783</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Verizon Voices Concerns about New Top Level Domain Names - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5745#comment-389783</guid>
		<description>[...] try to assert rights to generic terms. For example, Hearst is also in favor of a white list and wants the generic term &#8220;Cosmopolitan&#8221; reserved against all possible [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] try to assert rights to generic terms. For example, Hearst is also in favor of a white list and wants the generic term &#8220;Cosmopolitan&#8221; reserved against all possible [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InternetLaw</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/14/resounding-opposition-to-new-top-level-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-529349</link>
		<dc:creator>InternetLaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5745#comment-529349</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;“Resounding Opposition to New Top Level Domains” http://tinyurl.com/cxnvt6&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">“Resounding Opposition to New Top Level Domains” <a href="http://tinyurl.com/cxnvt6" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/cxnvt6</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/14/resounding-opposition-to-new-top-level-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-384210</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5745#comment-384210</guid>
		<description>Abigail - I don&#039;t :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abigail &#8211; I don&#8217;t <img src='http://domainnamewire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abigail</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/14/resounding-opposition-to-new-top-level-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-384146</link>
		<dc:creator>Abigail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5745#comment-384146</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confident that ICANN has the wherewithal to defend themselves from frivolous lawsuits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confident that ICANN has the wherewithal to defend themselves from frivolous lawsuits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/14/resounding-opposition-to-new-top-level-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-384077</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5745#comment-384077</guid>
		<description>Abigail - it will undermine the stability of ICANN because they will get sued by many parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abigail &#8211; it will undermine the stability of ICANN because they will get sued by many parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

