<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SmoothMove.com: Worst UDRP Decision Ever?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/09/smoothmovecom-worst-udrp-decision-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/09/smoothmovecom-worst-udrp-decision-ever/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:34:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; WorldWide Media Sues to Retain SmoothMove.com - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/09/smoothmovecom-worst-udrp-decision-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-390458</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; WorldWide Media Sues to Retain SmoothMove.com - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5680#comment-390458</guid>
		<description>[...] this month, a National Arbitration Forum panel found that Worldwide Media must transfer its ownership of SmoothMove.com to Traditional Medicinals. Traditional Medicinals offers a laxative [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] this month, a National Arbitration Forum panel found that Worldwide Media must transfer its ownership of SmoothMove.com to Traditional Medicinals. Traditional Medicinals offers a laxative [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohio civil engineer</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/09/smoothmovecom-worst-udrp-decision-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-381155</link>
		<dc:creator>ohio civil engineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5680#comment-381155</guid>
		<description>domain guy:

If I&#039;m not mistaken, the plaintiff can be held responsible for the legal bills of the defense, provided the defense wins and the plaintiff was shown to have filed the claim in bad faith. (I could be wrong)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>domain guy:</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m not mistaken, the plaintiff can be held responsible for the legal bills of the defense, provided the defense wins and the plaintiff was shown to have filed the claim in bad faith. (I could be wrong)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/09/smoothmovecom-worst-udrp-decision-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-380591</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5680#comment-380591</guid>
		<description>Patrick - that&#039;s a good article.  It makes a point I hadn&#039;t really thought about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick &#8211; that&#8217;s a good article.  It makes a point I hadn&#8217;t really thought about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick McDermott</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/09/smoothmovecom-worst-udrp-decision-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-380407</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick McDermott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5680#comment-380407</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

Did you see this guest written article on DNN?

&quot;The Continued Expansion Of Trademarks In Cyberspace&quot;

http://snurl.com/TMExpansion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>Did you see this guest written article on DNN?</p>
<p>&#8220;The Continued Expansion Of Trademarks In Cyberspace&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://snurl.com/TMExpansion" rel="nofollow">http://snurl.com/TMExpansion</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InternetLaw</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/09/smoothmovecom-worst-udrp-decision-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-529350</link>
		<dc:creator>InternetLaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5680#comment-529350</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;“SmoothMove.com: Worst UDRP Decision Ever?” http://tinyurl.com/dd2rld&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">“SmoothMove.com: Worst UDRP Decision Ever?” <a href="http://tinyurl.com/dd2rld" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/dd2rld</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InternetLaw</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/09/smoothmovecom-worst-udrp-decision-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-529351</link>
		<dc:creator>InternetLaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 02:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5680#comment-529351</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;“SmoothMove.com: Worst UDRP Decision Ever?” http://tinyurl.com/dd2rld&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">“SmoothMove.com: Worst UDRP Decision Ever?” <a href="http://tinyurl.com/dd2rld" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/dd2rld</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/09/smoothmovecom-worst-udrp-decision-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-379902</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5680#comment-379902</guid>
		<description>If it were only the domain, this would not be worth Mike going to court over.

But; as already pointed out up comments; if he let&#039;s it stand, it could make such claims easier to win against others of his names.

As I&#039;m sure Ari and Mike are already discussing, should they decide to take it to court, they might as well include a challenge to their trademark.

Though that would be a tough argument to win, by threatening their valuable TM, it might in the least bring them to the bargaining table.

And saying he&#039;s a &quot;domain name trafficker&quot;?

What is that; like a drug trafficker?

That&#039;s not only crap...it&#039;s smooth move crap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it were only the domain, this would not be worth Mike going to court over.</p>
<p>But; as already pointed out up comments; if he let&#8217;s it stand, it could make such claims easier to win against others of his names.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;m sure Ari and Mike are already discussing, should they decide to take it to court, they might as well include a challenge to their trademark.</p>
<p>Though that would be a tough argument to win, by threatening their valuable TM, it might in the least bring them to the bargaining table.</p>
<p>And saying he&#8217;s a &#8220;domain name trafficker&#8221;?</p>
<p>What is that; like a drug trafficker?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not only crap&#8230;it&#8217;s smooth move crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

