Comments on: Edible Arrangements Should Stick to Edibles http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/08/edible-arrangements-should-stick-to-edibles/ News and Views for the Domain Name Industry Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:35:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Edible Franchisee http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/08/edible-arrangements-should-stick-to-edibles/comment-page-1/#comment-665625 Edible Franchisee Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:52:33 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5624#comment-665625 Tariq Farid (CEO Edible Arrangements) tries to use the American Legal system to his advantage at every turn. He is a dishonest, unethical criminal who tries to hind behind his so called religious faith. He tries to build a mosque in the middle of a residential neighborhood in CT and when the neighbors cry foul, he claims that his religious freedoms are being trampled by a 'Sad Agenda" against islam. He continually rapes his franchisees with new fees, mandatory purchases from vendors he owns and unreasonable and unsustainable business models. As EA staores are closing all across the country, he claims the system has never been stronger. He is a snake oil saleman, its as simple as that. Tariq Farid (CEO Edible Arrangements) tries to use the American Legal system to his advantage at every turn. He is a dishonest, unethical criminal who tries to hind behind his so called religious faith. He tries to build a mosque in the middle of a residential neighborhood in CT and when the neighbors cry foul, he claims that his religious freedoms are being trampled by a ‘Sad Agenda” against islam. He continually rapes his franchisees with new fees, mandatory purchases from vendors he owns and unreasonable and unsustainable business models. As EA staores are closing all across the country, he claims the system has never been stronger. He is a snake oil saleman, its as simple as that.

]]> By: John Berryhill http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/08/edible-arrangements-should-stick-to-edibles/comment-page-1/#comment-396692 John Berryhill Fri, 01 May 2009 14:44:22 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5624#comment-396692 "It seems that the panelists and lawyers (Berryhill included) does not ask for a reverse domain name hijacking ruling anymore." Typically, the panels ignore such requests. There was considerable bad faith behavior by the Complainant well beyond that documented in the decision, and which was most assuredly pointed out to the panel. The UDRP requires panels, in all cases, to consider whether the complaint was brought in bad faith. UDRP providers are competitive entities, and do not encourage chastisement of their customers - i.e. the UDRP complainants. “It seems that the panelists and lawyers (Berryhill included) does not ask for a reverse domain name hijacking ruling anymore.”

Typically, the panels ignore such requests. There was considerable bad faith behavior by the Complainant well beyond that documented in the decision, and which was most assuredly pointed out to the panel.

The UDRP requires panels, in all cases, to consider whether the complaint was brought in bad faith. UDRP providers are competitive entities, and do not encourage chastisement of their customers – i.e. the UDRP complainants.

]]> By: Johnny http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/08/edible-arrangements-should-stick-to-edibles/comment-page-1/#comment-378858 Johnny Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:05:55 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5624#comment-378858 Yeah.....but again.....where the hell is the reverse domain hijacking cliam. It seems that the panelists and lawyers (Berryhill included) does not ask for a reverse domain name hijacking ruling anymore. Correct me if I am wrong, but that is what I am seeing. This is a total b.s. case just like a few others recently.....but they complainants are not held liable. This has to stop!!!! Yeah…..but again…..where the hell is the reverse domain hijacking cliam.

It seems that the panelists and lawyers (Berryhill included) does not ask for a reverse domain name hijacking ruling anymore.

Correct me if I am wrong, but that is what I am seeing.

This is a total b.s. case just like a few others recently…..but they complainants are not held liable.

This has to stop!!!!

]]> By: Rob Sequin http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/08/edible-arrangements-should-stick-to-edibles/comment-page-1/#comment-378698 Rob Sequin Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:08:18 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5624#comment-378698 Great news for the registrant and John. Congratulations and thanks for fighting for us all. I hope this article gets some main stream media coverage and Edible is embarrassed by their behavior. Maybe I'll keep sending flowers :-) Great news for the registrant and John. Congratulations and thanks for fighting for us all.

I hope this article gets some main stream media coverage and Edible is embarrassed by their behavior.

Maybe I’ll keep sending flowers :-)

]]> By: Melissa http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/08/edible-arrangements-should-stick-to-edibles/comment-page-1/#comment-528660 Melissa Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:04:40 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5624#comment-528660 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Edible Arrangements loses arbitration case for EdibleBrands.com via RT @domainnamewire: http://tinyurl.com/cs9ndk</span></span>

Edible Arrangements loses arbitration case for EdibleBrands.com via RT @domainnamewire: http://tinyurl.com/cs9ndk

]]> By: Latest Domainer News http://domainnamewire.com/2009/04/08/edible-arrangements-should-stick-to-edibles/comment-page-1/#comment-528661 Latest Domainer News Wed, 08 Apr 2009 14:13:05 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5624#comment-528661 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Edible Arrangements Should Stick to Edibles - http://tinyurl.com/cs9ndk</span></span>

Edible Arrangements Should Stick to Edibles – http://tinyurl.com/cs9ndk

]]>