<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Elizabeth Taylor Wants Her Name Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/26/elizabeth-taylor-wants-her-name-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/26/elizabeth-taylor-wants-her-name-back/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:34:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: NameDrive Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ND Weekly #81</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/26/elizabeth-taylor-wants-her-name-back/comment-page-1/#comment-395477</link>
		<dc:creator>NameDrive Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ND Weekly #81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5415#comment-395477</guid>
		<description>[...] But that’s where things get weird. DomainTools’ last archived whois record for the domain in 2005 was December 30, and it still shows the respondent still owned the domain. More&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] But that’s where things get weird. DomainTools’ last archived whois record for the domain in 2005 was December 30, and it still shows the respondent still owned the domain. More&#8230; [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/26/elizabeth-taylor-wants-her-name-back/comment-page-1/#comment-370394</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5415#comment-370394</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are thousands of people named Elizabeth Taylor so it is an obvious generic.&quot;

That would be true if it wasn&#039;t parked with ads for Elizabeth Taylor products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are thousands of people named Elizabeth Taylor so it is an obvious generic.&#8221;</p>
<p>That would be true if it wasn&#8217;t parked with ads for Elizabeth Taylor products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gazzip</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/26/elizabeth-taylor-wants-her-name-back/comment-page-1/#comment-370336</link>
		<dc:creator>Gazzip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5415#comment-370336</guid>
		<description>Bummer, it&#039;s a real shame when people park Famous peoples domains, Bo Derek lost hers, got it back and then let it expire again, I think it was sold on snap a couple of years back, same thing - it now shows ads related to her.

Tom Cruise won his back around 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bummer, it&#8217;s a real shame when people park Famous peoples domains, Bo Derek lost hers, got it back and then let it expire again, I think it was sold on snap a couple of years back, same thing &#8211; it now shows ads related to her.</p>
<p>Tom Cruise won his back around 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/26/elizabeth-taylor-wants-her-name-back/comment-page-1/#comment-370335</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5415#comment-370335</guid>
		<description>There are thousands of people named Elizabeth Taylor so it is an obvious generic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are thousands of people named Elizabeth Taylor so it is an obvious generic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Consultant</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/26/elizabeth-taylor-wants-her-name-back/comment-page-1/#comment-369996</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5415#comment-369996</guid>
		<description>Sounds like the original owner let it expire, eNom grabbed it, put it up for Auction.  Then, the winner of the auction found out about the UDRP, didn&#039;t pay eNom and it went to eNom&#039;s Defaulted Domains.  

I would guess eNom has it now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like the original owner let it expire, eNom grabbed it, put it up for Auction.  Then, the winner of the auction found out about the UDRP, didn&#8217;t pay eNom and it went to eNom&#8217;s Defaulted Domains.  </p>
<p>I would guess eNom has it now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
