<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toys.com Loses Google Ranking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/16/toyscom-loses-google-ranking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/16/toyscom-loses-google-ranking/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: apentium</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/16/toyscom-loses-google-ranking/comment-page-1/#comment-906622</link>
		<dc:creator>apentium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 10:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5184#comment-906622</guid>
		<description>Now, 2 years later you do not see any problem. It is a good lesson that whatever happens may have different outcomes in the short run and the picture may be different in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, 2 years later you do not see any problem. It is a good lesson that whatever happens may have different outcomes in the short run and the picture may be different in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Columbus Wedding Photographers</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/16/toyscom-loses-google-ranking/comment-page-1/#comment-659595</link>
		<dc:creator>Columbus Wedding Photographers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 05:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5184#comment-659595</guid>
		<description>Thats crazy... wonder if there is a way to rectify the situation.  Surely they must have people employed who would have known that the wrong move was being made???

What an investment up in smoke!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats crazy&#8230; wonder if there is a way to rectify the situation.  Surely they must have people employed who would have known that the wrong move was being made???</p>
<p>What an investment up in smoke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Columbus DJ</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/16/toyscom-loses-google-ranking/comment-page-1/#comment-659594</link>
		<dc:creator>Columbus DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 05:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5184#comment-659594</guid>
		<description>Wow... thats great information.  Amazing that a company that size makes the same types of mistakes that I would make... although they&#039;re playing in a completley different league!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; thats great information.  Amazing that a company that size makes the same types of mistakes that I would make&#8230; although they&#8217;re playing in a completley different league!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guaranteed seo</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/16/toyscom-loses-google-ranking/comment-page-1/#comment-656927</link>
		<dc:creator>Guaranteed seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5184#comment-656927</guid>
		<description>Wow, millions to lose and 301 redirects must solve this problem easily !?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, millions to lose and 301 redirects must solve this problem easily !?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 Domain Name Wire Stories of 2009 &#124; Generic CCtlds</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/16/toyscom-loses-google-ranking/comment-page-1/#comment-533997</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 Domain Name Wire Stories of 2009 &#124; Generic CCtlds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5184#comment-533997</guid>
		<description>[...] Toys.com Loses Google Ranking â€“ Toys â€˜Râ€™ Us spends $5.1 million on a domain name with great search rankings, only to lose [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Toys.com Loses Google Ranking â€“ Toys â€˜Râ€™ Us spends $5.1 million on a domain name with great search rankings, only to lose [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GuaranteedRankings</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/16/toyscom-loses-google-ranking/comment-page-1/#comment-445681</link>
		<dc:creator>GuaranteedRankings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5184#comment-445681</guid>
		<description>Redirects (302 temporary or 301 permanent) are easy to overlook...and when it comes to stable SEO, it turns out to be one of the most important factors. A simple 301 redirect would have helped Toys.com avoid the ranking slippage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Redirects (302 temporary or 301 permanent) are easy to overlook&#8230;and when it comes to stable SEO, it turns out to be one of the most important factors. A simple 301 redirect would have helped Toys.com avoid the ranking slippage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Toys &#8216;R&#8217; Us Relaunches Toys.com Without Search Rankings - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/16/toyscom-loses-google-ranking/comment-page-1/#comment-440091</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Toys &#8216;R&#8217; Us Relaunches Toys.com Without Search Rankings - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5184#comment-440091</guid>
		<description>[...] its newly purchased ($5.1M) domain name Toys.com to ToysRUs.com. This resulted in the company losing its search rankings for Toys.com. The story was viewed 30,000 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] its newly purchased ($5.1M) domain name Toys.com to ToysRUs.com. This resulted in the company losing its search rankings for Toys.com. The story was viewed 30,000 [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

