<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domain Name Industry Acquisition Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/11/domain-name-industry-acquisition-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/11/domain-name-industry-acquisition-watch/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:34:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Sedo Paid $825,000 for RevenueDirect - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/11/domain-name-industry-acquisition-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-378800</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Sedo Paid $825,000 for RevenueDirect - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4971#comment-378800</guid>
		<description>[...] 2. It signifies future consolidation in the domain parking business, especially for smaller domain parking companies. (See Domain Name Industry Acquisition Watch). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] 2. It signifies future consolidation in the domain parking business, especially for smaller domain parking companies. (See Domain Name Industry Acquisition Watch). [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Douglas</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/11/domain-name-industry-acquisition-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-360488</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4971#comment-360488</guid>
		<description>Hi Andrew,

Thanks for accepting my explanation of my original comment on your article. Your work stands unchallenged from this reader.

On your final question above: &quot;is it a big deal if your parking company or registrar is bought?&quot;

My answer is: &quot;It is a big deal if the acquisition changes the scope of your company&#039;s profit-making platform, or adds significantly to it.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew,</p>
<p>Thanks for accepting my explanation of my original comment on your article. Your work stands unchallenged from this reader.</p>
<p>On your final question above: &#8220;is it a big deal if your parking company or registrar is bought?&#8221;</p>
<p>My answer is: &#8220;It is a big deal if the acquisition changes the scope of your company&#8217;s profit-making platform, or adds significantly to it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wannadevelop.com</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/11/domain-name-industry-acquisition-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-359999</link>
		<dc:creator>wannadevelop.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4971#comment-359999</guid>
		<description>DBS stock has been in a free fall since peaking in late 2007 from it&#039;s all time high of $1 to now 20 cents

Looks like people are just waiting to see what happens next.. No action so far this year.

This is going to be be very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DBS stock has been in a free fall since peaking in late 2007 from it&#8217;s all time high of $1 to now 20 cents</p>
<p>Looks like people are just waiting to see what happens next.. No action so far this year.</p>
<p>This is going to be be very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/11/domain-name-industry-acquisition-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-359796</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4971#comment-359796</guid>
		<description>Thanks Stephen.  Apparently some people did read way too much into this, making assumptions that are clearly not in the story.  Which brings up another question: is it a big deal if your parking company or registrar is bought?  Probably not.  An article for another time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stephen.  Apparently some people did read way too much into this, making assumptions that are clearly not in the story.  Which brings up another question: is it a big deal if your parking company or registrar is bought?  Probably not.  An article for another time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Douglas</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/11/domain-name-industry-acquisition-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-359791</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4971#comment-359791</guid>
		<description>Hi Andrew,

By no means was I directing my comments to you. I know you are a consummate neutral reporter in this business. I&#039;m actually sorry that my comments made it seem this way, I was actually directing my comments to those who read your article and &quot;assumed&quot; Fabulous was in trouble. I&#039;ve talked to Dan and Richard at length, and I know a little bit of where they&#039;re intending to go. Making profits on selling your company isn&#039;t a &quot;red flag&quot; that your company is suffering, although many noobies will think that. 

I appreciate your answer (as I know DBS/Fabulous does too!). However, I will make it clear here right now that your article in no way made me doubt your knowledge of upcoming possibilities in the way of acquisitions. I know of a few myself, but because I&#039;m involved with several of the companies, I can&#039;t post them on my blog or comment on them publicly. 

I apologize if my comments seemed to question your veracity, which I have never done, and probably never will. 

I&#039;m just trying to calm the kneejerk reactions from some of your readers... lol

By the way, did you check out the pic I have of you at the Playboy mansion? It&#039;s on  my facebook page bro... NOW you should be worried... but just as a matter of &quot;Elliot can&#039;t be trusted - he&#039;s a sneaky troublemaker...&quot; cuz you&#039;re standing right next to him and he knows you are a top story scooper... WHAT WILL ELLIOT DO TO SABATOGE US??!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew,</p>
<p>By no means was I directing my comments to you. I know you are a consummate neutral reporter in this business. I&#8217;m actually sorry that my comments made it seem this way, I was actually directing my comments to those who read your article and &#8220;assumed&#8221; Fabulous was in trouble. I&#8217;ve talked to Dan and Richard at length, and I know a little bit of where they&#8217;re intending to go. Making profits on selling your company isn&#8217;t a &#8220;red flag&#8221; that your company is suffering, although many noobies will think that. </p>
<p>I appreciate your answer (as I know DBS/Fabulous does too!). However, I will make it clear here right now that your article in no way made me doubt your knowledge of upcoming possibilities in the way of acquisitions. I know of a few myself, but because I&#8217;m involved with several of the companies, I can&#8217;t post them on my blog or comment on them publicly. </p>
<p>I apologize if my comments seemed to question your veracity, which I have never done, and probably never will. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m just trying to calm the kneejerk reactions from some of your readers&#8230; lol</p>
<p>By the way, did you check out the pic I have of you at the Playboy mansion? It&#8217;s on  my facebook page bro&#8230; NOW you should be worried&#8230; but just as a matter of &#8220;Elliot can&#8217;t be trusted &#8211; he&#8217;s a sneaky troublemaker&#8230;&#8221; cuz you&#8217;re standing right next to him and he knows you are a top story scooper&#8230; WHAT WILL ELLIOT DO TO SABATOGE US??!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/11/domain-name-industry-acquisition-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-359755</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4971#comment-359755</guid>
		<description>Stephen,

First of all, I must say that I am also a fan of Fabulous.  I&#039;ve never heard any complaints about them and believe they share their customers interests.  All my interactions with Fabulous leading up to the publication of this article have been very professional.

I originally started writing this article when I found out that DBS was talking to parties (plural) about selling off some of its products, specifically inside fabulous.  As you know, I never print anything without thoroughly researching it.  This article was researched over several weeks.

After communicating with Richard Moore at length, I decided it would be more valuable to readers to write an article about the factors driving M&amp;A over the next 12-24 months rather than discuss Fabulous alone.  I subsequently talked to high ranking execs at a number of domain companies to get their take on the industry, which is part of how I came up with the factors that are driving change in the industry (slim margins, Google/Yahoo contract negotiations, et al).  Not all of these factors apply directly to Fabulous&#039; situation, nor should that be implied.

Fabulous is merely a backdrop.  I&#039;m not singling them out as being weak and &quot;needing&quot; to sell.  In fact, their cash position is the same as it was this time last year.  That&#039;s part of the reason I note that they may not sell anything this year.

That said, Fabulous is clearly not as strong as it was a year ago, just like other companies in the industry.  They are facing many of the challenges that other companies in the industry are facing.  They are not immune, but I think they&#039;re well positioned compared to some other companies.  But they&#039;re feeling the squeeze in their services businesses.  Had I heard of (and confirmed) another company actively talking about selling one or more of its units, I would have published that.

I know you&#039;re not questioning my integrity or reporting, but I do want to make it clear that I stand by this story at accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen,</p>
<p>First of all, I must say that I am also a fan of Fabulous.  I&#8217;ve never heard any complaints about them and believe they share their customers interests.  All my interactions with Fabulous leading up to the publication of this article have been very professional.</p>
<p>I originally started writing this article when I found out that DBS was talking to parties (plural) about selling off some of its products, specifically inside fabulous.  As you know, I never print anything without thoroughly researching it.  This article was researched over several weeks.</p>
<p>After communicating with Richard Moore at length, I decided it would be more valuable to readers to write an article about the factors driving M&#038;A over the next 12-24 months rather than discuss Fabulous alone.  I subsequently talked to high ranking execs at a number of domain companies to get their take on the industry, which is part of how I came up with the factors that are driving change in the industry (slim margins, Google/Yahoo contract negotiations, et al).  Not all of these factors apply directly to Fabulous&#8217; situation, nor should that be implied.</p>
<p>Fabulous is merely a backdrop.  I&#8217;m not singling them out as being weak and &#8220;needing&#8221; to sell.  In fact, their cash position is the same as it was this time last year.  That&#8217;s part of the reason I note that they may not sell anything this year.</p>
<p>That said, Fabulous is clearly not as strong as it was a year ago, just like other companies in the industry.  They are facing many of the challenges that other companies in the industry are facing.  They are not immune, but I think they&#8217;re well positioned compared to some other companies.  But they&#8217;re feeling the squeeze in their services businesses.  Had I heard of (and confirmed) another company actively talking about selling one or more of its units, I would have published that.</p>
<p>I know you&#8217;re not questioning my integrity or reporting, but I do want to make it clear that I stand by this story at accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Douglas</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/11/domain-name-industry-acquisition-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-359620</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4971#comment-359620</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read the above comments by all. Dub-A is correct that this year will be a bellwether year for domain company acquisitions, but singling out DBS/Fabulous and assuming they&#039;re in a &quot;weak&quot; position and needy to sell is ludicrous. 

Most domainers know that Fabulous is probably the most domainer-friendly/service-oriented registrar/parking service around. They&#039;ve been in the game longer than most, and every domain conference today has sucked the teet of the first-ever domainer meeting by Dean Shannon 8 years ago in LA.

Along with the fact that not one domainer/blogger has EVER legitimately complained about Fabulous.com and their &quot;fabulous&quot; team, comes the reality that DBS&#039;s type of domain industry positioning alone is extremely valuable.  I don&#039;t know one domainer who has something negative to say about Fabulous/DBS.  (compare that with GoDaddy, where I have stated before that Bob Parsons doesn&#039;t involve himself in promoting the very business community that allows him to think and behave likes he&#039;s Larry Flynt.).

Also missing in this article are other domain industry power punchers, such as Name Media and a few others.

Dub-A is right to &quot;tease&quot; us with this article about buyouts and consolidations, but none of us (that would print it publicly) can really say what the market leaders are going to do... yet.  ;-)

Stay tuned for a wild ride through 2009, but don&#039;t believe for a moment that Fabulous is &quot;weak&quot; or hurting.  Any move they make will be seriously profitable for them, and at the same time, advantageous to the domainer community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read the above comments by all. Dub-A is correct that this year will be a bellwether year for domain company acquisitions, but singling out DBS/Fabulous and assuming they&#8217;re in a &#8220;weak&#8221; position and needy to sell is ludicrous. </p>
<p>Most domainers know that Fabulous is probably the most domainer-friendly/service-oriented registrar/parking service around. They&#8217;ve been in the game longer than most, and every domain conference today has sucked the teet of the first-ever domainer meeting by Dean Shannon 8 years ago in LA.</p>
<p>Along with the fact that not one domainer/blogger has EVER legitimately complained about Fabulous.com and their &#8220;fabulous&#8221; team, comes the reality that DBS&#8217;s type of domain industry positioning alone is extremely valuable.  I don&#8217;t know one domainer who has something negative to say about Fabulous/DBS.  (compare that with GoDaddy, where I have stated before that Bob Parsons doesn&#8217;t involve himself in promoting the very business community that allows him to think and behave likes he&#8217;s Larry Flynt.).</p>
<p>Also missing in this article are other domain industry power punchers, such as Name Media and a few others.</p>
<p>Dub-A is right to &#8220;tease&#8221; us with this article about buyouts and consolidations, but none of us (that would print it publicly) can really say what the market leaders are going to do&#8230; yet.  <img src='http://domainnamewire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Stay tuned for a wild ride through 2009, but don&#8217;t believe for a moment that Fabulous is &#8220;weak&#8221; or hurting.  Any move they make will be seriously profitable for them, and at the same time, advantageous to the domainer community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
