<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Should Domain Registrars Do with Expired Domain Names?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/06/what-should-domain-registrars-do-with-expired-domain-names/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/06/what-should-domain-registrars-do-with-expired-domain-names/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernard</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/06/what-should-domain-registrars-do-with-expired-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-355231</link>
		<dc:creator>bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 11:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5006#comment-355231</guid>
		<description>Icann could delegate a company to do the job of selling the dopped domains with an auctioning system, and keep the money that could benefit to develop some parts of Internet.

But in this case, the registrars would certainly heavily promote a system to prevent the domain expiration by suggesting the domain owner to sell instead of letting expire.

Thus, the registrar are certainly in a strong position.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Icann could delegate a company to do the job of selling the dopped domains with an auctioning system, and keep the money that could benefit to develop some parts of Internet.</p>
<p>But in this case, the registrars would certainly heavily promote a system to prevent the domain expiration by suggesting the domain owner to sell instead of letting expire.</p>
<p>Thus, the registrar are certainly in a strong position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InternetLaw</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/06/what-should-domain-registrars-do-with-expired-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-529832</link>
		<dc:creator>InternetLaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 15:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5006#comment-529832</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;â€œWhat Should Domain Registrars Do with Expired Domain Names?â€ http://tinyurl.com/9w5nq3&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">â€œWhat Should Domain Registrars Do with Expired Domain Names?â€ <a href="http://tinyurl.com/9w5nq3" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/9w5nq3</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WINNA</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/06/what-should-domain-registrars-do-with-expired-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-354278</link>
		<dc:creator>WINNA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 04:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5006#comment-354278</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a farce and soon we will see a complete overhaul of the prehistoric systems that are in place.

WINNA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a farce and soon we will see a complete overhaul of the prehistoric systems that are in place.</p>
<p>WINNA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EM @ KING.NET</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/06/what-should-domain-registrars-do-with-expired-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-354081</link>
		<dc:creator>EM @ KING.NET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 22:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5006#comment-354081</guid>
		<description>@Mike
I agree with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike<br />
I agree with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wannadevelop.com</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/06/what-should-domain-registrars-do-with-expired-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-354071</link>
		<dc:creator>wannadevelop.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 22:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5006#comment-354071</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t pay.. You lose it. 

It&#039;s as simple as that --- the registrar can do whatever they want without breaking any rules. They are the ones in control and can do as they please.

Sure it may be an ethical issue or whatever but who cares about morals. The domain industry was never big on ethics. It is a big time negative score in that department.

Business is business. They will tap into all avenues in hopes of generating a few bucks here and there.

All the best,

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t pay.. You lose it. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s as simple as that &#8212; the registrar can do whatever they want without breaking any rules. They are the ones in control and can do as they please.</p>
<p>Sure it may be an ethical issue or whatever but who cares about morals. The domain industry was never big on ethics. It is a big time negative score in that department.</p>
<p>Business is business. They will tap into all avenues in hopes of generating a few bucks here and there.</p>
<p>All the best,</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EM @ KING.NET</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/06/what-should-domain-registrars-do-with-expired-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-354049</link>
		<dc:creator>EM @ KING.NET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5006#comment-354049</guid>
		<description>I think this is a discussion we&#039;re not going anywhere. Why the registrar bother to give you 50/50 if they can keep 100%?

IMHO

Regards,
EM @ KING.NET</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a discussion we&#8217;re not going anywhere. Why the registrar bother to give you 50/50 if they can keep 100%?</p>
<p>IMHO</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
EM @ KING.NET</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/06/what-should-domain-registrars-do-with-expired-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-354046</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 21:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=5006#comment-354046</guid>
		<description>@ Labrocca - when Network Solutions began &quot;direct transferring&quot; their names, they paid a small amount (15%) to the domain owner.  I think this was because NetSol changed the contract after the domain was originally registered, so it felt like it needed to offer some sort of compensation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Labrocca &#8211; when Network Solutions began &#8220;direct transferring&#8221; their names, they paid a small amount (15%) to the domain owner.  I think this was because NetSol changed the contract after the domain was originally registered, so it felt like it needed to offer some sort of compensation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

