<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VeriSign: 177 Million Domain Names Registered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/18/verisign-177-million-domain-names-registered/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/18/verisign-177-million-domain-names-registered/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 17:21:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/18/verisign-177-million-domain-names-registered/comment-page-1/#comment-340929</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4633#comment-340929</guid>
		<description>I wonder if Verisign needs to download this excel template from Microsoft?

http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/templates/TC012043531033.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if Verisign needs to download this excel template from Microsoft?</p>
<p><a href="http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/templates/TC012043531033.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/templates/TC012043531033.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/18/verisign-177-million-domain-names-registered/comment-page-1/#comment-340928</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4633#comment-340928</guid>
		<description>I assume .com numbers are down for the following reason and in this order.

Reduction in tasting (plus threat of TM  lawsuit)

Reduction in ppc revenue.  
Decrease in individual revenue and increase in renewal cost causes marginal domains to become unprofitable.

Global economic recession.

I speculate the next couple quarters will also be down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume .com numbers are down for the following reason and in this order.</p>
<p>Reduction in tasting (plus threat of TM  lawsuit)</p>
<p>Reduction in ppc revenue.<br />
Decrease in individual revenue and increase in renewal cost causes marginal domains to become unprofitable.</p>
<p>Global economic recession.</p>
<p>I speculate the next couple quarters will also be down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/18/verisign-177-million-domain-names-registered/comment-page-1/#comment-340895</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4633#comment-340895</guid>
		<description>@ Steve M - I don&#039;t think the higher fees on .com/.net have much to do with it.  The only people that would drop domains b/c of that are for domains that barely made a profit.  

Now domain tasting being reduced, that&#039;s an obvious omission...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Steve M &#8211; I don&#8217;t think the higher fees on .com/.net have much to do with it.  The only people that would drop domains b/c of that are for domains that barely made a profit.  </p>
<p>Now domain tasting being reduced, that&#8217;s an obvious omission&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/18/verisign-177-million-domain-names-registered/comment-page-1/#comment-340879</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4633#comment-340879</guid>
		<description>Gee; no suggestion that their higher fees might be one of the factors in the lower numbers?

Are any of us surprised at this omission?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee; no suggestion that their higher fees might be one of the factors in the lower numbers?</p>
<p>Are any of us surprised at this omission?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

