<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toys.com Back On Auction; May Sell for Over $1.25M</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/18/toyscom-back-on-auction-may-sell-for-over-125m/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/18/toyscom-back-on-auction-may-sell-for-over-125m/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:15:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Yahoo Domain Sale was Win-Win - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/18/toyscom-back-on-auction-may-sell-for-over-125m/comment-page-1/#comment-422919</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Yahoo Domain Sale was Win-Win - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4625#comment-422919</guid>
		<description>[...] at the auction who decided not to participate. It was very different from Toys.com, in which only a handful of bidders were aware and kept the secret to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] at the auction who decided not to participate. It was very different from Toys.com, in which only a handful of bidders were aware and kept the secret to [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Sell a Website for $1M &#187; Ask Shane.org</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/18/toyscom-back-on-auction-may-sell-for-over-125m/comment-page-1/#comment-363812</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Sell a Website for $1M &#187; Ask Shane.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4625#comment-363812</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] they could have, and it kills me to know how much they left on the table.  You almost never get a chance to correct that.  Once the sale is over, it&#8217;s over &#8212; regardless of how good a deal the buyer got.  I [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ToysRus Buys Toys.com for $5.1 Million &#124; Domain Name News</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/18/toyscom-back-on-auction-may-sell-for-over-125m/comment-page-1/#comment-348461</link>
		<dc:creator>ToysRus Buys Toys.com for $5.1 Million &#124; Domain Name News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4625#comment-348461</guid>
		<description>[...] Bidders included domain investors Frank Schilling as well as Larry Fischer and Ari Goldberg who were the previous stalking horse bidder. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Bidders included domain investors Frank Schilling as well as Larry Fischer and Ari Goldberg who were the previous stalking horse bidder. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blazo</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/18/toyscom-back-on-auction-may-sell-for-over-125m/comment-page-1/#comment-344036</link>
		<dc:creator>Blazo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4625#comment-344036</guid>
		<description>wow, How I wished there were people like this to come bid on my name!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, How I wished there were people like this to come bid on my name!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/18/toyscom-back-on-auction-may-sell-for-over-125m/comment-page-1/#comment-341199</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 02:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4625#comment-341199</guid>
		<description>@ WannaDevelop - if more than one company is willing to pay $1M, which is the case here, then it&#039;s worth more than $1M.  

It&#039;s true that Amazon was there and didn&#039;t pick up anything.  Oversee.net &quot;bought in&quot; but didn&#039;t show up.

It won&#039;t be an end user, it will be a domain investor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ WannaDevelop &#8211; if more than one company is willing to pay $1M, which is the case here, then it&#8217;s worth more than $1M.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that Amazon was there and didn&#8217;t pick up anything.  Oversee.net &#8220;bought in&#8221; but didn&#8217;t show up.</p>
<p>It won&#8217;t be an end user, it will be a domain investor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wannadevelop.com</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/18/toyscom-back-on-auction-may-sell-for-over-125m/comment-page-1/#comment-341071</link>
		<dc:creator>wannadevelop.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4625#comment-341071</guid>
		<description>This name isn&#039;t worth millions in today&#039;s down market.

Amazon.com was in the auction.

Reinvent.com and Oversee.net were as well.

The market sets the price... and it did.

If anybody could make it work as a standalone business it would be Amazon which happens to be a billion dollar company.

I&#039;m telling you, whoever the new owner will be --- it still won&#039;t be any of the giants or end users.

It will be a company from the domain space and the toys.com domain will be setup with a nice and boring parked page ;)

Moving on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This name isn&#8217;t worth millions in today&#8217;s down market.</p>
<p>Amazon.com was in the auction.</p>
<p>Reinvent.com and Oversee.net were as well.</p>
<p>The market sets the price&#8230; and it did.</p>
<p>If anybody could make it work as a standalone business it would be Amazon which happens to be a billion dollar company.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m telling you, whoever the new owner will be &#8212; it still won&#8217;t be any of the giants or end users.</p>
<p>It will be a company from the domain space and the toys.com domain will be setup with a nice and boring parked page <img src='http://domainnamewire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Moving on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RegFeeNames.com</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/18/toyscom-back-on-auction-may-sell-for-over-125m/comment-page-1/#comment-340884</link>
		<dc:creator>RegFeeNames.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4625#comment-340884</guid>
		<description>Yes this name should have sold for approx $3-5mil in my eyes but it is very tough out there in getting cash to buy a domain.

Even large companies shall struggle but I see someone like Walmart etc going after this if they market it correctly to them.

Regards,

Robbie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes this name should have sold for approx $3-5mil in my eyes but it is very tough out there in getting cash to buy a domain.</p>
<p>Even large companies shall struggle but I see someone like Walmart etc going after this if they market it correctly to them.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Robbie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

