<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Domain Names Have No Intrinsic Value&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/09/domain-names-have-no-intrinsic-value/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/09/domain-names-have-no-intrinsic-value/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:34:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Douglas</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/09/domain-names-have-no-intrinsic-value/comment-page-1/#comment-338211</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4441#comment-338211</guid>
		<description>Dub-A, this guy&#039;s comments are spot on, but literally set on a &quot;railroad track&quot; type of marketing expectation. 

There are so many ways to develop a domain, monetize it, build its value, sell it, use it for promoting your own company, etc, I don&#039;t want to list them all here because I get paid for showing companies how to take their domains and get the best value that meets their expectations and needs.

Just speaking as a rep for WhyPark, for less than a dollar, every domainer can get content on their domain to AT LEAST ATTEMPT TO GET IT INDEXED. This is the first value that all domain owners should attempt to achieve. Parking a domain may get good (or bad) revenue, but it will DEFINITELY NOT get your domain indexed by the search engines. 

Each domain in a portfolio must be evaluated in order to determine if they are domains that should be developed, parked, sold in the aftermarket (and how that sale should proceed), built into a directory, or simply just indexed with relevant content cheaply to build organic traffic.

Matthew makes valid points, but those points, if they are well-taken, just direct domain owners with questions to domain consultants like Adam Strong, Brian Benko, Rob Sequin, yourself and maybe myself - along with others (sorry I didn&#039;t mention you here). All of us have made good money from utilizing domains with their &quot;intrinsic value&quot;.  The value can only be determined by expert evaluation first.. but even longtails have value, as seen in some of the Moniker auction sales at Domainfest09.  I sold three domains for a total of $4000 that I only had about $200 invested. That&#039;s a nice return... 

Domains have intrinsic value once you understand the many paths to that value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dub-A, this guy&#8217;s comments are spot on, but literally set on a &#8220;railroad track&#8221; type of marketing expectation. </p>
<p>There are so many ways to develop a domain, monetize it, build its value, sell it, use it for promoting your own company, etc, I don&#8217;t want to list them all here because I get paid for showing companies how to take their domains and get the best value that meets their expectations and needs.</p>
<p>Just speaking as a rep for WhyPark, for less than a dollar, every domainer can get content on their domain to AT LEAST ATTEMPT TO GET IT INDEXED. This is the first value that all domain owners should attempt to achieve. Parking a domain may get good (or bad) revenue, but it will DEFINITELY NOT get your domain indexed by the search engines. </p>
<p>Each domain in a portfolio must be evaluated in order to determine if they are domains that should be developed, parked, sold in the aftermarket (and how that sale should proceed), built into a directory, or simply just indexed with relevant content cheaply to build organic traffic.</p>
<p>Matthew makes valid points, but those points, if they are well-taken, just direct domain owners with questions to domain consultants like Adam Strong, Brian Benko, Rob Sequin, yourself and maybe myself &#8211; along with others (sorry I didn&#8217;t mention you here). All of us have made good money from utilizing domains with their &#8220;intrinsic value&#8221;.  The value can only be determined by expert evaluation first.. but even longtails have value, as seen in some of the Moniker auction sales at Domainfest09.  I sold three domains for a total of $4000 that I only had about $200 invested. That&#8217;s a nice return&#8230; </p>
<p>Domains have intrinsic value once you understand the many paths to that value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/09/domain-names-have-no-intrinsic-value/comment-page-1/#comment-337816</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 04:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4441#comment-337816</guid>
		<description>@ Simon-

I&#039;m sure David would be happy to talk to you about it.  But here are two points:

1. The site doesn&#039;t sell advertising on the unproductive CPM basis.

2. You need to stop looking at Alexa.  It&#039;s essentially worthless.  Compete.com shows 39,000 uniques and a rank of 51,000.  Assuming that&#039;s right, I suspect that means the site gets nearly 3,000 page views a day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Simon-</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure David would be happy to talk to you about it.  But here are two points:</p>
<p>1. The site doesn&#8217;t sell advertising on the unproductive CPM basis.</p>
<p>2. You need to stop looking at Alexa.  It&#8217;s essentially worthless.  Compete.com shows 39,000 uniques and a rank of 51,000.  Assuming that&#8217;s right, I suspect that means the site gets nearly 3,000 page views a day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Barrett</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/09/domain-names-have-no-intrinsic-value/comment-page-1/#comment-337716</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 02:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4441#comment-337716</guid>
		<description>Hi Folks,

I an the senior editor for Blogger News, the spot where this whole debacle started. I am oh so curious about this statement:

However, our PalmSprings.com generates over $100,000 a month as a developed site. Does the name PalmSprings.com have intrinsic value? Yes, because I know for a fact that the name itself played a big part in attracting advertisers from Day 1.

A simple Alexa search shows this site with a rating in the 180,000 range, in other words your grandmothers blog is going to have more traffic than this. At a 180k, maybe it is getting 100 hits a day (though I doubt it). How can it possibly be generating $100k per month?

As the senior editor for BNN I would invite Mr. &#039;Rich&#039; to contact me, clearly his is a story that is newsworthy.

Simon Barrett zzsimonb@gmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Folks,</p>
<p>I an the senior editor for Blogger News, the spot where this whole debacle started. I am oh so curious about this statement:</p>
<p>However, our PalmSprings.com generates over $100,000 a month as a developed site. Does the name PalmSprings.com have intrinsic value? Yes, because I know for a fact that the name itself played a big part in attracting advertisers from Day 1.</p>
<p>A simple Alexa search shows this site with a rating in the 180,000 range, in other words your grandmothers blog is going to have more traffic than this. At a 180k, maybe it is getting 100 hits a day (though I doubt it). How can it possibly be generating $100k per month?</p>
<p>As the senior editor for BNN I would invite Mr. &#8216;Rich&#8217; to contact me, clearly his is a story that is newsworthy.</p>
<p>Simon Barrett <a href="mailto:zzsimonb@gmail.com">zzsimonb@gmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShanePike</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/09/domain-names-have-no-intrinsic-value/comment-page-1/#comment-528665</link>
		<dc:creator>ShanePike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4441#comment-528665</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Domain names have no intrinsic value:  http://twurl.nl/20jvtl http://is.gd/jjW7&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Domain names have no intrinsic value:  <a href="http://twurl.nl/20jvtl" rel="nofollow">http://twurl.nl/20jvtl</a> <a href="http://is.gd/jjW7" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/jjW7</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/09/domain-names-have-no-intrinsic-value/comment-page-1/#comment-334961</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4441#comment-334961</guid>
		<description>Great, great post, Andrew, and great follow-up comments from Matthew.  It would be great if this keeps someone from making a big mistake, but many (like me) actually have to make the mistake in order to believe it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, great post, Andrew, and great follow-up comments from Matthew.  It would be great if this keeps someone from making a big mistake, but many (like me) actually have to make the mistake in order to believe it <img src='http://domainnamewire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Started with Domain Development</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/09/domain-names-have-no-intrinsic-value/comment-page-1/#comment-334154</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Started with Domain Development</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4441#comment-334154</guid>
		<description>[...] great blog posts have been  written on the topic lately as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] great blog posts have been  written on the topic lately as [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/09/domain-names-have-no-intrinsic-value/comment-page-1/#comment-332934</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4441#comment-332934</guid>
		<description>Matthew - I think your last paragraph sums up David&#039;s point.  A diamond doesn&#039;t earn income.  A domain name, when parked, earns income.  So it does have value.  It&#039;s not a full fledged business, but it clearly has value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew &#8211; I think your last paragraph sums up David&#8217;s point.  A diamond doesn&#8217;t earn income.  A domain name, when parked, earns income.  So it does have value.  It&#8217;s not a full fledged business, but it clearly has value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

