<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arena.com Owner Wins Domain Name Arbitration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/06/arenacom-owner-wins-domain-name-arbitration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/06/arenacom-owner-wins-domain-name-arbitration/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 17:21:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Starkey</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/06/arenacom-owner-wins-domain-name-arbitration/comment-page-1/#comment-799782</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Starkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4409#comment-799782</guid>
		<description>I would think the price has gone up just a bit.  I think it would cost them at least $250K for the aggravation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would think the price has gone up just a bit.  I think it would cost them at least $250K for the aggravation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bagel</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/06/arenacom-owner-wins-domain-name-arbitration/comment-page-1/#comment-376508</link>
		<dc:creator>bagel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4409#comment-376508</guid>
		<description>Must be nice not having to work for your money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must be nice not having to work for your money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/06/arenacom-owner-wins-domain-name-arbitration/comment-page-1/#comment-351650</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4409#comment-351650</guid>
		<description>I had the same problem with www.VitaminShoppe.com wanted me to give them www.VitaminShop.com   they ended up buying it from me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same problem with <a href="http://www.VitaminShoppe.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.VitaminShoppe.com</a> wanted me to give them <a href="http://www.VitaminShop.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.VitaminShop.com</a>   they ended up buying it from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/06/arenacom-owner-wins-domain-name-arbitration/comment-page-1/#comment-330019</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4409#comment-330019</guid>
		<description>Worth mentioning the respondent isn&#039;t some small fry, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worth mentioning the respondent isn&#8217;t some small fry, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/06/arenacom-owner-wins-domain-name-arbitration/comment-page-1/#comment-329998</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 18:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4409#comment-329998</guid>
		<description>D quote -
&quot;$200K was actually reasonable price. 
This happens when stupid companies listen to their lawyers.&quot;

Or, the advertising agency or sales manager, etc.

They should have asked an expert about its value. (maybe, they did??)

Now, they have a snowball chance in hell of ever buying it.

Monday quarterbacking, they should have had a broker act as the the buyer, they might have had a chance of buying and for less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D quote -<br />
&#8220;$200K was actually reasonable price.<br />
This happens when stupid companies listen to their lawyers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or, the advertising agency or sales manager, etc.</p>
<p>They should have asked an expert about its value. (maybe, they did??)</p>
<p>Now, they have a snowball chance in hell of ever buying it.</p>
<p>Monday quarterbacking, they should have had a broker act as the the buyer, they might have had a chance of buying and for less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NameDrive Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ND Weekly #75</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/06/arenacom-owner-wins-domain-name-arbitration/comment-page-1/#comment-329846</link>
		<dc:creator>NameDrive Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ND Weekly #75</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4409#comment-329846</guid>
		<description>[...] Arena.com Owner Wins Domain Name Arbitration Sometimes I see a domain name dispute and wonder what the heck the complainant was thinking. When I saw that the one word generic domain name Arena.com was in dispute, I scratched my head. First of all, Iâ€™d never heard of the complainant. Second, you better have some damning evidence against the respondent to go after a generic word such as Arena. When I see the domain name Arena.com, I think of sports arenas. As it turns out, the complainant didnâ€™t have good evidence of bad faith registration by the respondent. It was just another case of a company not wanting to pay fair market value for a domain name. The complainant, Descente, Ltd. and Arena Distribution, S.A., offers a swimwear line called Arena. The respondent, Portsnportals Enterprises Limited, is a member company of the Hutchison Whampoa group of companies, which operates in a wide variety of commercial areas. The respondent used the Arena.com domain for a document management system earlier this decade but no longer uses the domain name. More&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Arena.com Owner Wins Domain Name Arbitration Sometimes I see a domain name dispute and wonder what the heck the complainant was thinking. When I saw that the one word generic domain name Arena.com was in dispute, I scratched my head. First of all, Iâ€™d never heard of the complainant. Second, you better have some damning evidence against the respondent to go after a generic word such as Arena. When I see the domain name Arena.com, I think of sports arenas. As it turns out, the complainant didnâ€™t have good evidence of bad faith registration by the respondent. It was just another case of a company not wanting to pay fair market value for a domain name. The complainant, Descente, Ltd. and Arena Distribution, S.A., offers a swimwear line called Arena. The respondent, Portsnportals Enterprises Limited, is a member company of the Hutchison Whampoa group of companies, which operates in a wide variety of commercial areas. The respondent used the Arena.com domain for a document management system earlier this decade but no longer uses the domain name. More&#8230; [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/02/06/arenacom-owner-wins-domain-name-arbitration/comment-page-1/#comment-329633</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 06:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4409#comment-329633</guid>
		<description>$200K was actually reasonable price. This happens when stupid companies listen to their lawyers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$200K was actually reasonable price. This happens when stupid companies listen to their lawyers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

