<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google: We&#8217;re Committed to Domain Channel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/29/google-were-committed-to-domain-channel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/29/google-were-committed-to-domain-channel/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 17:21:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/29/google-were-committed-to-domain-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-325301</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4252#comment-325301</guid>
		<description>@ Bihar - it used to require 750k uniques/month to get a direct account.  The Google Adsense for Domains &quot;online&quot; has no minimum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Bihar &#8211; it used to require 750k uniques/month to get a direct account.  The Google Adsense for Domains &#8220;online&#8221; has no minimum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bihar</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/29/google-were-committed-to-domain-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-325255</link>
		<dc:creator>Bihar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4252#comment-325255</guid>
		<description>This is interesting, is there any specified number of domains one has to obtain to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting, is there any specified number of domains one has to obtain to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/29/google-were-committed-to-domain-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-325116</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4252#comment-325116</guid>
		<description>I fealt like even though some of the questions were a bit off Hal still didn&#039;t actually really answer any of the questions that were asked. Fortunately he did slip in those positive nuggets like &quot;Google is not pulling out of the domain channel any time soon&quot;.

Why doesn&#039;t he just admit that when he says &quot;Transparency&quot; he is talking about end users. The advertisers only enjoy slightly more transparancey than we do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fealt like even though some of the questions were a bit off Hal still didn&#8217;t actually really answer any of the questions that were asked. Fortunately he did slip in those positive nuggets like &#8220;Google is not pulling out of the domain channel any time soon&#8221;.</p>
<p>Why doesn&#8217;t he just admit that when he says &#8220;Transparency&#8221; he is talking about end users. The advertisers only enjoy slightly more transparancey than we do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/29/google-were-committed-to-domain-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-325020</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 02:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4252#comment-325020</guid>
		<description>@ Johnny &quot;The word â€œcommittedâ€ kindaâ€™ contrasts with â€œnot any time soonâ€ 

Hal was very cautious.  If he said they were &quot;committed&quot; and then there was a shake-up in a year, people would say he lied.  So I think he was just covering himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Johnny &#8220;The word â€œcommittedâ€ kindaâ€™ contrasts with â€œnot any time soonâ€ </p>
<p>Hal was very cautious.  If he said they were &#8220;committed&#8221; and then there was a shake-up in a year, people would say he lied.  So I think he was just covering himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/29/google-were-committed-to-domain-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-324872</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4252#comment-324872</guid>
		<description>Nice reporting. :)

The word &quot;committed&quot; kinda&#039; contrasts with &quot;not any time soon&quot;.  I wish he was more clear.

Good news, anyhow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice reporting. <img src='http://domainnamewire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The word &#8220;committed&#8221; kinda&#8217; contrasts with &#8220;not any time soon&#8221;.  I wish he was more clear.</p>
<p>Good news, anyhow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/29/google-were-committed-to-domain-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-324845</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4252#comment-324845</guid>
		<description>The video I captured didn&#039;t come out well.

The biggest value-add of the domain companies is Google doesn&#039;t have to provide support to every jack and jane domain owner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The video I captured didn&#8217;t come out well.</p>
<p>The biggest value-add of the domain companies is Google doesn&#8217;t have to provide support to every jack and jane domain owner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Ohashi</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/29/google-were-committed-to-domain-channel/comment-page-1/#comment-324791</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Ohashi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4252#comment-324791</guid>
		<description>There video of this session?  Domain Parking co&#039;s are a value-add in terms of designing technology and optimizing it, but they are also value-taking in that they have to give up a larger share for it....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There video of this session?  Domain Parking co&#8217;s are a value-add in terms of designing technology and optimizing it, but they are also value-taking in that they have to give up a larger share for it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

