<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top.com Tops $100,000 at Auction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/27/topcom-tops-100000-at-auction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/27/topcom-tops-100000-at-auction/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 17:21:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Someoneâ€™s Shouting the F-Bomb About Fbomb.com</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/27/topcom-tops-100000-at-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-364529</link>
		<dc:creator>Someoneâ€™s Shouting the F-Bomb About Fbomb.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4203#comment-364529</guid>
		<description>[...] January I wrote about an ongoing auction at Sedo for the domain name Fbomb.com. Here&#8217;s what I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] January I wrote about an ongoing auction at Sedo for the domain name Fbomb.com. Here&#8217;s what I [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Someone&#8217;s Shouting the F-Bomb About Fbomb.com - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/27/topcom-tops-100000-at-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-364498</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Someone&#8217;s Shouting the F-Bomb About Fbomb.com - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4203#comment-364498</guid>
		<description>[...] January I wrote about an ongoing auction at Sedo for the domain name Fbomb.com. Here&#8217;s what I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] January I wrote about an ongoing auction at Sedo for the domain name Fbomb.com. Here&#8217;s what I [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Sedo Sells $1.25M Domains in One Week, Top.com Tops Them All - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/27/topcom-tops-100000-at-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-356907</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Sedo Sells $1.25M Domains in One Week, Top.com Tops Them All - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4203#comment-356907</guid>
		<description>[...] a bit). The top sale was Top.com for $357,500 EUR (about $455,000 USD), an auction Domain Name Wire reported on in January. The buyer was in Russia. The seller&#8217;s whois information has been protected for a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] a bit). The top sale was Top.com for $357,500 EUR (about $455,000 USD), an auction Domain Name Wire reported on in January. The buyer was in Russia. The seller&#8217;s whois information has been protected for a [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mobifan</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/27/topcom-tops-100000-at-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-323869</link>
		<dc:creator>mobifan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4203#comment-323869</guid>
		<description>FIrst movies, now tv and the internet are going 3d. As the internet goes 3d, does anyone think 3d before or after a Generic Name will be of value?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FIrst movies, now tv and the internet are going 3d. As the internet goes 3d, does anyone think 3d before or after a Generic Name will be of value?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/27/topcom-tops-100000-at-auction/comment-page-1/#comment-323286</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4203#comment-323286</guid>
		<description>Well; Top is still a nice value at anything under US 150K; while I&#039;ll be surprised if Acaijuice actually closes at anything over 20K.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well; Top is still a nice value at anything under US 150K; while I&#8217;ll be surprised if Acaijuice actually closes at anything over 20K.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

