<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Domainers Should (and Shouldn&#8217;t) Do Post Kentucky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/21/what-domainers-should-and-shouldnt-do-post-kentucky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/21/what-domainers-should-and-shouldnt-do-post-kentucky/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 17:21:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/21/what-domainers-should-and-shouldnt-do-post-kentucky/comment-page-1/#comment-345087</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4098#comment-345087</guid>
		<description>@ Mario - for Geo domains, there&#039;s plenty of case history in the U.S.  I&#039;m not familiar with other countries with case history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Mario &#8211; for Geo domains, there&#8217;s plenty of case history in the U.S.  I&#8217;m not familiar with other countries with case history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario Koch</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/21/what-domainers-should-and-shouldnt-do-post-kentucky/comment-page-1/#comment-345074</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario Koch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4098#comment-345074</guid>
		<description>&quot;For a number of reasons, I think the United States is one of the safest places to keep your domains. In fact, U.S.-based Geo domainers who own foreign city and country names will keep the domains under the ownership of a U.S. company and lease them to a foreign subsidiary.&quot;

Thats just wrong and spreading wrong fear.

You can keep the city domain in any country if not the country where the city is located. Nothing will happen. Domain owners should learn a lesson from Kentucky and Cuba cases. Your domains domains are not safe in the US!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For a number of reasons, I think the United States is one of the safest places to keep your domains. In fact, U.S.-based Geo domainers who own foreign city and country names will keep the domains under the ownership of a U.S. company and lease them to a foreign subsidiary.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thats just wrong and spreading wrong fear.</p>
<p>You can keep the city domain in any country if not the country where the city is located. Nothing will happen. Domain owners should learn a lesson from Kentucky and Cuba cases. Your domains domains are not safe in the US!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Over Yet</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/21/what-domainers-should-and-shouldnt-do-post-kentucky/comment-page-1/#comment-323555</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Over Yet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4098#comment-323555</guid>
		<description>Kentucky plans to appeal the appellate court decision.  This isn&#039;t over yet, folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kentucky plans to appeal the appellate court decision.  This isn&#8217;t over yet, folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NameDrive Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ND Weekly</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/21/what-domainers-should-and-shouldnt-do-post-kentucky/comment-page-1/#comment-320343</link>
		<dc:creator>NameDrive Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ND Weekly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4098#comment-320343</guid>
		<description>[...] What Domainers Should (and Shouldnâ€™t) Do Post Kentucky Here are some things for domainers to consider now that the Kentucky case has been overturned. The Kentucky Court of Appeals has overturned a trial courtâ€™s ruling that the state could seize domain names associated with online gambling. The Court of Appeals ruled that domain names werenâ€™t â€œgambling devicesâ€, which was part of the statute used to justify seizing the domains. As Michael Berkens pointed out, this is a narrow victory. Electronic Frontier Foundation writes that the ruling suggests to the Kentucky legislature that it can change the definition of â€œgambling deviceâ€, but it still believes the case will be without merit because â€œIn addition to this type of domain name seizure still raising serious First Amendment, due process, and other constitutional problems, Kentucky courts (as pointed out in our joint amicus brief) also lack the authority to directly order out-of-state registrars to turn over customer domain names.â€ More&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] What Domainers Should (and Shouldnâ€™t) Do Post Kentucky Here are some things for domainers to consider now that the Kentucky case has been overturned. The Kentucky Court of Appeals has overturned a trial courtâ€™s ruling that the state could seize domain names associated with online gambling. The Court of Appeals ruled that domain names werenâ€™t â€œgambling devicesâ€, which was part of the statute used to justify seizing the domains. As Michael Berkens pointed out, this is a narrow victory. Electronic Frontier Foundation writes that the ruling suggests to the Kentucky legislature that it can change the definition of â€œgambling deviceâ€, but it still believes the case will be without merit because â€œIn addition to this type of domain name seizure still raising serious First Amendment, due process, and other constitutional problems, Kentucky courts (as pointed out in our joint amicus brief) also lack the authority to directly order out-of-state registrars to turn over customer domain names.â€ More&#8230; [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/21/what-domainers-should-and-shouldnt-do-post-kentucky/comment-page-1/#comment-319357</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4098#comment-319357</guid>
		<description>Howard - in this case it was even worse, since the court used GoDaddy&#039;s registrar certificates as proof that it had jurisdiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard &#8211; in this case it was even worse, since the court used GoDaddy&#8217;s registrar certificates as proof that it had jurisdiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HOWARD</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/21/what-domainers-should-and-shouldnt-do-post-kentucky/comment-page-1/#comment-319327</link>
		<dc:creator>HOWARD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4098#comment-319327</guid>
		<description>Andrew - you are also correct.  However, if you look up the terms of a &quot;registrar certificate&quot; you will see that it is tantamount to giving Kentucky the domains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew &#8211; you are also correct.  However, if you look up the terms of a &#8220;registrar certificate&#8221; you will see that it is tantamount to giving Kentucky the domains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/21/what-domainers-should-and-shouldnt-do-post-kentucky/comment-page-1/#comment-319305</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4098#comment-319305</guid>
		<description>Howard - you&#039;re correct.  With regards to GoDaddy, I don&#039;t think they handed the domains over.  They just gave the &quot;registrar certificate&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard &#8211; you&#8217;re correct.  With regards to GoDaddy, I don&#8217;t think they handed the domains over.  They just gave the &#8220;registrar certificate&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

