<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google Squeeze: How Google&#8217;s Black Box Affects Partners&#8217; Revenue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/15/the-google-squeeze-how-googles-black-box-affects-partners-revenue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/15/the-google-squeeze-how-googles-black-box-affects-partners-revenue/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/15/the-google-squeeze-how-googles-black-box-affects-partners-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-346018</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3959#comment-346018</guid>
		<description>Great write up.

At least with semi-developed sites, you have some second tier ad networks that will give you a comparable but still much lower pay out.  

As advertising dollars continue to dry up over the next couple of months, I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if Google continued to pull more and more of their advertisers from the domain space.

Time to partially develop and experiment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great write up.</p>
<p>At least with semi-developed sites, you have some second tier ad networks that will give you a comparable but still much lower pay out.  </p>
<p>As advertising dollars continue to dry up over the next couple of months, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if Google continued to pull more and more of their advertisers from the domain space.</p>
<p>Time to partially develop and experiment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Sedo Acquires RevenueDirect and Why It Makes Sense - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/15/the-google-squeeze-how-googles-black-box-affects-partners-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-345894</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Sedo Acquires RevenueDirect and Why It Makes Sense - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3959#comment-345894</guid>
		<description>[...] more to domainers, improving its overall positioning. Further, Google domain parking contracts include tiers with different revenue share rates. This acquisition may push it into a higher [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] more to domainers, improving its overall positioning. Further, Google domain parking contracts include tiers with different revenue share rates. This acquisition may push it into a higher [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/15/the-google-squeeze-how-googles-black-box-affects-partners-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-319755</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3959#comment-319755</guid>
		<description>Numbers are falling for alot of reasons. I&#039;m sure Google Squeezing us is 1 of them.

Of course they are sending more impressions to Google.com than the partner network. Wouldn&#039;t you do the thing that makes you more money (all things being equal for the advertiser)? If google didn&#039;t do this I would be more concearned with their future because I&#039;d say they are making bad decisions. Doing otherwise is like throwing away profit.

I imagine their system does some testing and probing with each ad, and shows the ad wherever it will make the most $$$ for google. If CTR for an ad is 2% at google.com, but 80% at a partner site, you can bet they will show it at the partner, and not waste their precious screen space on a poorly converting ad on google.com. They optimize their ad impressions just like we optimize our landing pages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Numbers are falling for alot of reasons. I&#8217;m sure Google Squeezing us is 1 of them.</p>
<p>Of course they are sending more impressions to Google.com than the partner network. Wouldn&#8217;t you do the thing that makes you more money (all things being equal for the advertiser)? If google didn&#8217;t do this I would be more concearned with their future because I&#8217;d say they are making bad decisions. Doing otherwise is like throwing away profit.</p>
<p>I imagine their system does some testing and probing with each ad, and shows the ad wherever it will make the most $$$ for google. If CTR for an ad is 2% at google.com, but 80% at a partner site, you can bet they will show it at the partner, and not waste their precious screen space on a poorly converting ad on google.com. They optimize their ad impressions just like we optimize our landing pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjorn</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/15/the-google-squeeze-how-googles-black-box-affects-partners-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-318337</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3959#comment-318337</guid>
		<description>Excellent post indeed. It seems alot is happening on the Google side, especially with adsense and such... Wonder where it will lead us to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post indeed. It seems alot is happening on the Google side, especially with adsense and such&#8230; Wonder where it will lead us to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terence Chan</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/15/the-google-squeeze-how-googles-black-box-affects-partners-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-316555</link>
		<dc:creator>Terence Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3959#comment-316555</guid>
		<description>For those of you who work in the advertising industry and can spotlight Google clicks down to a very granular level, the conclusion is that Google generate clicks generally perform horribly for call-to-action campaigns, and has tremendous bounce rates. 

It&#039;s not that the day of CPCs are dead, its just that the new analytics being used to track click quality has improved tremendously in the past 2 years.

The early domainers who exploited bots and human farms on hundreds of thousands of domain names (steal a little so nobody suspects theft) made the money. Admitted as Rick said &quot;Thank god for fools&quot; Those guys exploited ignorance, which was rampant with clients at that time. The word CPC was enough to convince them. 

That time is coming to an end, the big boys know that. Lets all just move forward with development.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who work in the advertising industry and can spotlight Google clicks down to a very granular level, the conclusion is that Google generate clicks generally perform horribly for call-to-action campaigns, and has tremendous bounce rates. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that the day of CPCs are dead, its just that the new analytics being used to track click quality has improved tremendously in the past 2 years.</p>
<p>The early domainers who exploited bots and human farms on hundreds of thousands of domain names (steal a little so nobody suspects theft) made the money. Admitted as Rick said &#8220;Thank god for fools&#8221; Those guys exploited ignorance, which was rampant with clients at that time. The word CPC was enough to convince them. </p>
<p>That time is coming to an end, the big boys know that. Lets all just move forward with development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NameDrive Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ND Weekly #73</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/15/the-google-squeeze-how-googles-black-box-affects-partners-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-316554</link>
		<dc:creator>NameDrive Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ND Weekly #73</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3959#comment-316554</guid>
		<description>[...] To better understand how Google can squeeze its partners, it’s important to understand the deals Google has in place with partners such as DomainSponsor , NameMedia, and Sedo. These contracts are confidential. But thanks to NameMedia’s (since aborted) attempt to go public, we can peek inside a Google Adsense contract. Here are some things to note&#8230; More&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] To better understand how Google can squeeze its partners, it’s important to understand the deals Google has in place with partners such as DomainSponsor , NameMedia, and Sedo. These contracts are confidential. But thanks to NameMedia’s (since aborted) attempt to go public, we can peek inside a Google Adsense contract. Here are some things to note&#8230; More&#8230; [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreshAvails.com</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/15/the-google-squeeze-how-googles-black-box-affects-partners-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-316546</link>
		<dc:creator>FreshAvails.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3959#comment-316546</guid>
		<description>You make some good points int he article and as stated above, domainers have to give thanks to Google for making domaining what it is today.  The best way to get leverage with Google is to provide a better class of traffic.  Let me ask you what improvements you have made over the past year or two?

Google&#039;s primary goal is to provide end-users with results they want and click on..advertisers or not.  If that means development, improved parking pages or better management of the keywords we are using. That should be the focus of all of us. After all. we do those things and we should see more revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some good points int he article and as stated above, domainers have to give thanks to Google for making domaining what it is today.  The best way to get leverage with Google is to provide a better class of traffic.  Let me ask you what improvements you have made over the past year or two?</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s primary goal is to provide end-users with results they want and click on..advertisers or not.  If that means development, improved parking pages or better management of the keywords we are using. That should be the focus of all of us. After all. we do those things and we should see more revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
