<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SnapNames Awarded Domain Backordering Patent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/14/snapnames-awarded-domain-backordering-patent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/14/snapnames-awarded-domain-backordering-patent/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:57:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/14/snapnames-awarded-domain-backordering-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-378192</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4011#comment-378192</guid>
		<description>Any patent can be granted (eg: 5443036 - cats chasing laster dots) - but that doesn&#039;t make them valid.

Without an inventive step, it&#039;s unenforceable.

Nothing that&#039;s &quot;obvious to one skilled in the art&quot; (in this case - programming and domain registrations) is enforceable either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any patent can be granted (eg: 5443036 &#8211; cats chasing laster dots) &#8211; but that doesn&#8217;t make them valid.</p>
<p>Without an inventive step, it&#8217;s unenforceable.</p>
<p>Nothing that&#8217;s &#8220;obvious to one skilled in the art&#8221; (in this case &#8211; programming and domain registrations) is enforceable either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorna</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/14/snapnames-awarded-domain-backordering-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-319423</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4011#comment-319423</guid>
		<description>adding snap names to my plonk list.  I&#039;ll never do business with such a stupid and silly company again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>adding snap names to my plonk list.  I&#8217;ll never do business with such a stupid and silly company again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tan Tran</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/14/snapnames-awarded-domain-backordering-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-318079</link>
		<dc:creator>Tan Tran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4011#comment-318079</guid>
		<description>The wording on the patent seems very broad in terms of expiring domains process.  Does this mean that snapnames literally has the power to wipe out namejet and pool with their leverage?

Or does this mean that there will be a very nasty legal fight ahead of us among these companies.

Tan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wording on the patent seems very broad in terms of expiring domains process.  Does this mean that snapnames literally has the power to wipe out namejet and pool with their leverage?</p>
<p>Or does this mean that there will be a very nasty legal fight ahead of us among these companies.</p>
<p>Tan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire » News » SnapNames Awarded Domain Backordering &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/14/snapnames-awarded-domain-backordering-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-317106</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire » News » SnapNames Awarded Domain Backordering &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 01:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4011#comment-317106</guid>
		<description>[...] the rest here: Domain Name Wire » News » SnapNames Awarded Domain Backordering &#8230;         Categories : Domain Registration, News, Whois, domain, domain-names, hosting, registrar, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] the rest here: Domain Name Wire » News » SnapNames Awarded Domain Backordering &#8230;         Categories : Domain Registration, News, Whois, domain, domain-names, hosting, registrar, [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DomainTools Blog</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/14/snapnames-awarded-domain-backordering-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-316109</link>
		<dc:creator>DomainTools Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4011#comment-316109</guid>
		<description>[...] was recently awarded patent #7,742,160, as brought to light at Domain Name Wire. The primary points of the patent cover the ability to capture domain names [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] was recently awarded patent #7,742,160, as brought to light at Domain Name Wire. The primary points of the patent cover the ability to capture domain names [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/14/snapnames-awarded-domain-backordering-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-315972</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4011#comment-315972</guid>
		<description>@ Patrick - keep in mind this dates back to 2000 and 2001.  And it&#039;s not just the idea of getting expired domains, but how they technically set up to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Patrick &#8211; keep in mind this dates back to 2000 and 2001.  And it&#8217;s not just the idea of getting expired domains, but how they technically set up to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/14/snapnames-awarded-domain-backordering-patent/comment-page-1/#comment-315971</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=4011#comment-315971</guid>
		<description>@ M. Menius - they filed a patent on it, but that doesn&#039;t mean they actually do it.  Theoretically, they could buy the information or get it from partner registrars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ M. Menius &#8211; they filed a patent on it, but that doesn&#8217;t mean they actually do it.  Theoretically, they could buy the information or get it from partner registrars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
