<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Companies Have Fiduciary Responsibility to Lock Down Domain Names</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/07/companies-have-fiduciary-responsibility-to-lock-down-domain-names/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/07/companies-have-fiduciary-responsibility-to-lock-down-domain-names/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:35:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Step by Step &#8211; This is how Iranian Cyber Army Hacked Baidu ZamaanOnline</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/07/companies-have-fiduciary-responsibility-to-lock-down-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-565061</link>
		<dc:creator>Step by Step &#8211; This is how Iranian Cyber Army Hacked Baidu ZamaanOnline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3863#comment-565061</guid>
		<description>[...] compromised are stunning. It’s also unfortunate that, had Baidu used added security such as that offered by Moniker or Fabulous, this entire event could have been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] compromised are stunning. It’s also unfortunate that, had Baidu used added security such as that offered by Moniker or Fabulous, this entire event could have been [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Details of how Baidu was hacked &#124; Shanghaied Weblog</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/07/companies-have-fiduciary-responsibility-to-lock-down-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-565059</link>
		<dc:creator>Details of how Baidu was hacked &#124; Shanghaied Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3863#comment-565059</guid>
		<description>[...] is not completely without fault because it should have taken more precautions to prevent this. There are more secure ways to protect people from taking control of your domain name. Baidu did not specify how much money it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] is not completely without fault because it should have taken more precautions to prevent this. There are more secure ways to protect people from taking control of your domain name. Baidu did not specify how much money it [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Domain Registrars Often Blamed for Customers&#8217; Mistakes - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/07/companies-have-fiduciary-responsibility-to-lock-down-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-496670</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Domain Registrars Often Blamed for Customers&#8217; Mistakes - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3863#comment-496670</guid>
		<description>[...] a number of added tools they should use to protect against many of the most common domain problems. Moniker and Fabulous offer domain locking tools with added security. GoDaddy offers Protected Registration. Companies should also subscribe to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] a number of added tools they should use to protect against many of the most common domain problems. Moniker and Fabulous offer domain locking tools with added security. GoDaddy offers Protected Registration. Companies should also subscribe to [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/07/companies-have-fiduciary-responsibility-to-lock-down-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-319717</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3863#comment-319717</guid>
		<description>I suppose its all about gross neglegance. If this happened. Who was neglegent here? CheckFree or NetSol? 

Gee sounds like these call in security measures are just so secure. I imagine that&#039;s how this one was breached. (Remember Register.com&#039;s auth code line of crap)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose its all about gross neglegance. If this happened. Who was neglegent here? CheckFree or NetSol? </p>
<p>Gee sounds like these call in security measures are just so secure. I imagine that&#8217;s how this one was breached. (Remember Register.com&#8217;s auth code line of crap)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RegFeeNames.com</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/07/companies-have-fiduciary-responsibility-to-lock-down-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-310344</link>
		<dc:creator>RegFeeNames.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3863#comment-310344</guid>
		<description>Great thinking Ricardo.

You would think companies like Amazon etc would set up there own registrar to look after there thousands of domains.

Protection is key in any business!

Especially Online!

Regards,

Robbie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great thinking Ricardo.</p>
<p>You would think companies like Amazon etc would set up there own registrar to look after there thousands of domains.</p>
<p>Protection is key in any business!</p>
<p>Especially Online!</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Robbie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/07/companies-have-fiduciary-responsibility-to-lock-down-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-310332</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3863#comment-310332</guid>
		<description>Netsol again???

Another solution (for domainers) would be to own your own private registrar.

For a public company, this type of dns hi-jacking could be devastating.

I&#039;m sure they used a site monitoring service.  
Why didn&#039;t the service pick up the hijacking?

But, it could also be socially engineered at the hosting company even if it is a dedicated server.  

Do corporate type registrars like MarkMonitor and CorporateDomains have add&#039;l level of access?   I don&#039;t know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netsol again???</p>
<p>Another solution (for domainers) would be to own your own private registrar.</p>
<p>For a public company, this type of dns hi-jacking could be devastating.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure they used a site monitoring service.<br />
Why didn&#8217;t the service pick up the hijacking?</p>
<p>But, it could also be socially engineered at the hosting company even if it is a dedicated server.  </p>
<p>Do corporate type registrars like MarkMonitor and CorporateDomains have add&#8217;l level of access?   I don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
