<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Files Patent for Unified Address Bar/Search Box</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/06/google-files-patent-for-unified-address-barsearch-box/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/06/google-files-patent-for-unified-address-barsearch-box/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:35:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Address/Search Bar in Firefox &#171; codemonkeyx.net</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/06/google-files-patent-for-unified-address-barsearch-box/comment-page-1/#comment-453451</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Address/Search Bar in Firefox &#171; codemonkeyx.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 05:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3859#comment-453451</guid>
		<description>[...] seems that Google has already patented that functionality, and I am not sure how I feel about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] seems that Google has already patented that functionality, and I am not sure how I feel about [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet search recipe? Your brand! &#124; The Merchant Stand from Bob Williams</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/06/google-files-patent-for-unified-address-barsearch-box/comment-page-1/#comment-389432</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet search recipe? Your brand! &#124; The Merchant Stand from Bob Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3859#comment-389432</guid>
		<description>[...] you&#8217;ll see that we may be headed for a combined address and search box. In fact, Google has filed for a patent to combine the two boxes.  If you use Firefox as your browser of choice, you will see that typing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] you&#8217;ll see that we may be headed for a combined address and search box. In fact, Google has filed for a patent to combine the two boxes.  If you use Firefox as your browser of choice, you will see that typing [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gloria</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/06/google-files-patent-for-unified-address-barsearch-box/comment-page-1/#comment-358984</link>
		<dc:creator>Gloria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3859#comment-358984</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never given this a try, but I think it&#039;s about time I do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never given this a try, but I think it&#8217;s about time I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S P Arif Sahari Wibowo</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/06/google-files-patent-for-unified-address-barsearch-box/comment-page-1/#comment-347511</link>
		<dc:creator>S P Arif Sahari Wibowo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3859#comment-347511</guid>
		<description>Uh sorry, apparently not as far as &quot;last century&quot;. Mozilla SeaMonkey start branching out of Mozilla at around 2005.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh sorry, apparently not as far as &#8220;last century&#8221;. Mozilla SeaMonkey start branching out of Mozilla at around 2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S P Arif Sahari Wibowo</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/06/google-files-patent-for-unified-address-barsearch-box/comment-page-1/#comment-347504</link>
		<dc:creator>S P Arif Sahari Wibowo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3859#comment-347504</guid>
		<description>Note that Mozilla SeaMonkey have unified address bar / search box since last century. But I guess the patent is just for a smartness, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that Mozilla SeaMonkey have unified address bar / search box since last century. But I guess the patent is just for a smartness, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boycott Novell &#187; Microsoft and Politics (Against Google)</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/06/google-files-patent-for-unified-address-barsearch-box/comment-page-1/#comment-320389</link>
		<dc:creator>Boycott Novell &#187; Microsoft and Politics (Against Google)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3859#comment-320389</guid>
		<description>[...] to this new report, Google is encouraging junk patents by getting some of its own:  Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) has filed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] to this new report, Google is encouraging junk patents by getting some of its own:  Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) has filed [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/01/06/google-files-patent-for-unified-address-barsearch-box/comment-page-1/#comment-319996</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3859#comment-319996</guid>
		<description>@ jp - could also be because I&#039;ve visited LandsEnd.com through my browser before?  Maybe it bases it on your historical usage too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ jp &#8211; could also be because I&#8217;ve visited LandsEnd.com through my browser before?  Maybe it bases it on your historical usage too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

