<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008 Domain Dunce Awards: Fired.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/31/2008-domain-dunce-awards-firedcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/31/2008-domain-dunce-awards-firedcom/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:01:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/31/2008-domain-dunce-awards-firedcom/comment-page-1/#comment-318737</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3788#comment-318737</guid>
		<description>@ Domain Offerings - in this case yet, but most of the time I see panels say it was confusingly similar.  Most of them just punt on the confusingly similar argument if it is similar. 

In this case I think the panel decided the case was so crazy, and that the complainant wasn&#039;t widely known by its Trademark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Domain Offerings &#8211; in this case yet, but most of the time I see panels say it was confusingly similar.  Most of them just punt on the confusingly similar argument if it is similar. </p>
<p>In this case I think the panel decided the case was so crazy, and that the complainant wasn&#8217;t widely known by its Trademark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Offerings</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/31/2008-domain-dunce-awards-firedcom/comment-page-1/#comment-318685</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Offerings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3788#comment-318685</guid>
		<description>Excellent, so even if the trademark was registered before the domain it still would not have passed the first criteria, correct? Now I have a precedence to show all the juveniles on forums that jump on everything as trademark violation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent, so even if the trademark was registered before the domain it still would not have passed the first criteria, correct? Now I have a precedence to show all the juveniles on forums that jump on everything as trademark violation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GPS</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/31/2008-domain-dunce-awards-firedcom/comment-page-1/#comment-307364</link>
		<dc:creator>GPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 14:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3788#comment-307364</guid>
		<description>Would be great to allow fired.com to recouperate legal fees from World2Work in situations like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be great to allow fired.com to recouperate legal fees from World2Work in situations like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/31/2008-domain-dunce-awards-firedcom/comment-page-1/#comment-307208</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 23:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3788#comment-307208</guid>
		<description>I think the overwhelming majority of people are sorely misguided when it comes to domain name &quot;rights&quot;. Just looking at some of the comments in our recent posts about trademark rights and user accounts or even the writer in the recent Fast Company article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the overwhelming majority of people are sorely misguided when it comes to domain name &#8220;rights&#8221;. Just looking at some of the comments in our recent posts about trademark rights and user accounts or even the writer in the recent Fast Company article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
