<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Demand Media Wants to Introduce New Domain Names</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/19/demand-media-wants-to-introduce-new-domain-names/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/19/demand-media-wants-to-introduce-new-domain-names/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:15:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Demand Media to ICANN: Hurry Up - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/19/demand-media-wants-to-introduce-new-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-401545</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Demand Media to ICANN: Hurry Up - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 13:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3712#comment-401545</guid>
		<description>[...] Media has been transparent about its desire to launch new top level domain names and to move the process along quickly. So it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Media has been transparent about its desire to launch new top level domain names and to move the process along quickly. So it [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/19/demand-media-wants-to-introduce-new-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-301195</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3712#comment-301195</guid>
		<description>@ Marc - I suspect there are a number of trademark lawyers who are opposed, but I think trademark lawyers also stand to benefit financially.  Even the lawyers who are filing briefs on behalf of their companies will ultimately benefit through job security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Marc &#8211; I suspect there are a number of trademark lawyers who are opposed, but I think trademark lawyers also stand to benefit financially.  Even the lawyers who are filing briefs on behalf of their companies will ultimately benefit through job security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc J. Randazza</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/19/demand-media-wants-to-introduce-new-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-300801</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc J. Randazza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3712#comment-300801</guid>
		<description>I am a trademark lawyer and I am opposed -- especially opposed to the method by which ICANN plans to resolve conflicts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a trademark lawyer and I am opposed &#8212; especially opposed to the method by which ICANN plans to resolve conflicts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/19/demand-media-wants-to-introduce-new-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-300794</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 14:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3712#comment-300794</guid>
		<description>Everyone should move their names out of enom now. Their interface sucks anyway. No way to mass modify auth codes. Very tiresome trying to get auth codes one by one. 

Customer service is the worst in the industry. Takes days to hear back from them and then you only get a cut and paste answer.

And now this. Every real domainer should move out. At this point Godaddy is better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone should move their names out of enom now. Their interface sucks anyway. No way to mass modify auth codes. Very tiresome trying to get auth codes one by one. </p>
<p>Customer service is the worst in the industry. Takes days to hear back from them and then you only get a cut and paste answer.</p>
<p>And now this. Every real domainer should move out. At this point Godaddy is better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire » News » Demand Media Wants to Introduce New &#8230; &#124; helpfulnames.com</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/19/demand-media-wants-to-introduce-new-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-300719</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire » News » Demand Media Wants to Introduce New &#8230; &#124; helpfulnames.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3712#comment-300719</guid>
		<description>[...] Domain Name Wire » News » Demand Media Wants to Introduce New &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Domain Name Wire » News » Demand Media Wants to Introduce New &#8230; [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J Castello</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/19/demand-media-wants-to-introduce-new-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-300682</link>
		<dc:creator>David J Castello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 06:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3712#comment-300682</guid>
		<description>Antony:
I also read the Department of Commerce and the Department of Justice&#039;s letter. I would say that both have &quot;severe&quot; reservations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antony:<br />
I also read the Department of Commerce and the Department of Justice&#8217;s letter. I would say that both have &#8220;severe&#8221; reservations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RKB</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/19/demand-media-wants-to-introduce-new-domain-names/comment-page-1/#comment-300497</link>
		<dc:creator>RKB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 23:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3712#comment-300497</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think US gov is going to follow thru on its opposition to ICANN problems regarding variable pricing, pricing caps, and new TLDs. I have serious doubts given its past track record.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think US gov is going to follow thru on its opposition to ICANN problems regarding variable pricing, pricing caps, and new TLDs. I have serious doubts given its past track record.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

