<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marchex Lays Off 10%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/05/marchex-lays-off-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/05/marchex-lays-off-10/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:34:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RegFeeNames.com</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/05/marchex-lays-off-10/comment-page-1/#comment-292538</link>
		<dc:creator>RegFeeNames.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3495#comment-292538</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Andrew - I believe that many of them are overstaffed - Taking more and more people on in the happy days of ppc.

They need to slim down there overheads to reamin to make profits during the downturn.

What I dont get is we never see or hear of them developing there domains.

Marchex owns hundreds of thousands of names and I would say they could generate more cash actually developing some of these names instead of parking.

Regards,

Robbie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Andrew &#8211; I believe that many of them are overstaffed &#8211; Taking more and more people on in the happy days of ppc.</p>
<p>They need to slim down there overheads to reamin to make profits during the downturn.</p>
<p>What I dont get is we never see or hear of them developing there domains.</p>
<p>Marchex owns hundreds of thousands of names and I would say they could generate more cash actually developing some of these names instead of parking.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Robbie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/05/marchex-lays-off-10/comment-page-1/#comment-292491</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3495#comment-292491</guid>
		<description>Elliot - I agree.  But I also think some of them got pretty fat during the boom of the past few years and need to clean up a bit of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elliot &#8211; I agree.  But I also think some of them got pretty fat during the boom of the past few years and need to clean up a bit of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/05/marchex-lays-off-10/comment-page-1/#comment-292490</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3495#comment-292490</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that many of the successful domain companies are very small and have less overhead.  For development and technology, much of this is outsourced, but it keeps costs down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that many of the successful domain companies are very small and have less overhead.  For development and technology, much of this is outsourced, but it keeps costs down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
