<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CheckFree.com Theft Should Lead to Added Registrar Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/05/checkfreecom-theft-should-lead-to-added-registrar-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/05/checkfreecom-theft-should-lead-to-added-registrar-security/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:07:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Companies Have Fiduciary Responsibility to Lock Down Domain Names - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/05/checkfreecom-theft-should-lead-to-added-registrar-security/comment-page-1/#comment-310327</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Companies Have Fiduciary Responsibility to Lock Down Domain Names - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3504#comment-310327</guid>
		<description>[...] is warning 5 million customers about its domain name mishap last month where its nameservers were changed to forward its web [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] is warning 5 million customers about its domain name mishap last month where its nameservers were changed to forward its web [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Fabulous&#8217; Executive Lock Would Have Saved CheckFree.com - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/05/checkfreecom-theft-should-lead-to-added-registrar-security/comment-page-1/#comment-295822</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Fabulous&#8217; Executive Lock Would Have Saved CheckFree.com - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3504#comment-295822</guid>
		<description>[...] light of the CheckFree.com nameserver &#8220;theft&#8221; last week, I opined that registrars must offer added security for important domain names. Specifically, important [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] light of the CheckFree.com nameserver &#8220;theft&#8221; last week, I opined that registrars must offer added security for important domain names. Specifically, important [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Robertson</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/05/checkfreecom-theft-should-lead-to-added-registrar-security/comment-page-1/#comment-295480</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3504#comment-295480</guid>
		<description>Only just caught up on my blog reading today and thought it was worth mentioning that Fabulous.com offer Executive Locks for Premium domains. More information here - http://tinyurl.com/5nqv6k. 

E-locks are a free value added service to all Fabulous.com customers.

Cheers,

Mike
Fabulous.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only just caught up on my blog reading today and thought it was worth mentioning that Fabulous.com offer Executive Locks for Premium domains. More information here &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/5nqv6k" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/5nqv6k</a>. </p>
<p>E-locks are a free value added service to all Fabulous.com customers.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Mike<br />
Fabulous.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/05/checkfreecom-theft-should-lead-to-added-registrar-security/comment-page-1/#comment-293048</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3504#comment-293048</guid>
		<description>Ms Domainer:  This case isn&#039;t about transfer a domain - to do that you&#039;ll need to confirm the transfer through several steps (involving contact e-mail address).  This case is about changing name servers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms Domainer:  This case isn&#8217;t about transfer a domain &#8211; to do that you&#8217;ll need to confirm the transfer through several steps (involving contact e-mail address).  This case is about changing name servers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms Domainer</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/05/checkfreecom-theft-should-lead-to-added-registrar-security/comment-page-1/#comment-292656</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms Domainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3504#comment-292656</guid>
		<description>*

Andrew, you do raise a good point.

I just thought $35.00 seemed a bit steep, although it may be worthwhile on a super premium.

*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*</p>
<p>Andrew, you do raise a good point.</p>
<p>I just thought $35.00 seemed a bit steep, although it may be worthwhile on a super premium.</p>
<p>*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/05/checkfreecom-theft-should-lead-to-added-registrar-security/comment-page-1/#comment-292626</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3504#comment-292626</guid>
		<description>@ Ms. Domainer - I don&#039;t want that sort of protection on my domains.  You used to have to fax in a copy of your drivers license just to change ownership of a domain.  And you had to pay a fee.  An added level of protection should be provided to companies that want/need it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ms. Domainer &#8211; I don&#8217;t want that sort of protection on my domains.  You used to have to fax in a copy of your drivers license just to change ownership of a domain.  And you had to pay a fee.  An added level of protection should be provided to companies that want/need it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms Domainer</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/05/checkfreecom-theft-should-lead-to-added-registrar-security/comment-page-1/#comment-292619</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms Domainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3504#comment-292619</guid>
		<description>*

I don&#039;t think registrars should gouge their customers by charging them 34.95 extra to protect their domains.

When I buy a house, ownership can&#039;t pass to someone else unless I, with ID in hand, sign a document, so why not just require this before transfer?

*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think registrars should gouge their customers by charging them 34.95 extra to protect their domains.</p>
<p>When I buy a house, ownership can&#8217;t pass to someone else unless I, with ID in hand, sign a document, so why not just require this before transfer?</p>
<p>*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
