<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Frank Schilling Changes Registrar Name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/01/frank-schilling-changes-registrar-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/01/frank-schilling-changes-registrar-name/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:50:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/01/frank-schilling-changes-registrar-name/comment-page-1/#comment-292995</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 16:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3429#comment-292995</guid>
		<description>Hi,

&quot;Speaking of which, chillibeans.com is &lt;b&gt;still&lt;/b&gt; with Frank. I guess he filed suit for it already?&quot;

____

Good!!! Nice to hear Dave.

The term is as &quot;Generic&quot; as they come. No matter what the &quot;complainant&quot; has to say. IMHO.

Peace!
Dan
AKA &quot;Danno&quot; on Franks Blog...&#039;

If Frank ever gets the &#039;fire&#039; and &#039;time&#039; to start it back up...which I think we all can agree was a great blog and lots of fun....with great posts and comments.

My &quot;Seven Mile Rehab&quot;...is not going so well...its been months and I am still going through &quot;withdrawal symptoms&quot;...LOL


BTW: nice site here at Domain Name Wire also. Great info...and is always one of the first out with &#039;new&#039; domain news and storys.

Well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>&#8220;Speaking of which, chillibeans.com is <b>still</b> with Frank. I guess he filed suit for it already?&#8221;</p>
<p>____</p>
<p>Good!!! Nice to hear Dave.</p>
<p>The term is as &#8220;Generic&#8221; as they come. No matter what the &#8220;complainant&#8221; has to say. IMHO.</p>
<p>Peace!<br />
Dan<br />
AKA &#8220;Danno&#8221; on Franks Blog&#8230;&#8217;</p>
<p>If Frank ever gets the &#8216;fire&#8217; and &#8216;time&#8217; to start it back up&#8230;which I think we all can agree was a great blog and lots of fun&#8230;.with great posts and comments.</p>
<p>My &#8220;Seven Mile Rehab&#8221;&#8230;is not going so well&#8230;its been months and I am still going through &#8220;withdrawal symptoms&#8221;&#8230;LOL</p>
<p>BTW: nice site here at Domain Name Wire also. Great info&#8230;and is always one of the first out with &#8216;new&#8217; domain news and storys.</p>
<p>Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zan</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/01/frank-schilling-changes-registrar-name/comment-page-1/#comment-292789</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 09:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3429#comment-292789</guid>
		<description>@Andrew

Speaking of which, chillibeans.com is &lt;b&gt;still&lt;/b&gt; with Frank. I guess he filed suit for it already?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andrew</p>
<p>Speaking of which, chillibeans.com is <b>still</b> with Frank. I guess he filed suit for it already?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Guru</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/01/frank-schilling-changes-registrar-name/comment-page-1/#comment-291457</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 03:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3429#comment-291457</guid>
		<description>A smart move, as I would expect from Frank. You can learn alot from watching smart domainers like Frank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A smart move, as I would expect from Frank. You can learn alot from watching smart domainers like Frank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/01/frank-schilling-changes-registrar-name/comment-page-1/#comment-291439</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3429#comment-291439</guid>
		<description>@ Steve M - because if you don&#039;t hand it over then your registar will lose its accreditation from ICANN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Steve M &#8211; because if you don&#8217;t hand it over then your registar will lose its accreditation from ICANN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WQ</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/01/frank-schilling-changes-registrar-name/comment-page-1/#comment-291438</link>
		<dc:creator>WQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3429#comment-291438</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;Frank has NO interest in allowing others use his registrar.&lt;&lt;

Yeah, we know that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;Frank has NO interest in allowing others use his registrar.&lt;&lt;</p>
<p>Yeah, we know that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/01/frank-schilling-changes-registrar-name/comment-page-1/#comment-291437</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3429#comment-291437</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm ... when one owns their own registrar (or leases one with &quot;full &amp; complete&quot; control), how can such an owner be forced to hand over one of their own domains as the result of a WIPO/ UDRP decision ... if they don&#039;t really want to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm &#8230; when one owns their own registrar (or leases one with &#8220;full &amp; complete&#8221; control), how can such an owner be forced to hand over one of their own domains as the result of a WIPO/ UDRP decision &#8230; if they don&#8217;t really want to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/12/01/frank-schilling-changes-registrar-name/comment-page-1/#comment-291267</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3429#comment-291267</guid>
		<description>&quot;I wish he would open up for transfers and registrations…I’d be there quick.&quot;

I can&#039;t speak for Frank Schilling but I&#039;m positive 
Frank has NO interest in allowing others use his registrar.

His is the classic example of a &quot;private registrar&quot;.
You will see more and more of those in the future.

Why would he want to allow others into his registrar?
He doesn&#039;t need your domain if you don&#039;t renew it.
He doesn&#039;t need the few pennies gross profit from registering and renewing domains for others.
He doesn&#039;t need the extra, trival work.
Nor, the need to hire more people to manage the domains and handle communications.

At this point, there is NO WAY a domain could be hi-jacked out of his registrar without his authorization.
Domains are totally locked down from transfers out.
The prevention of one hi-jacking pays for itself. 

That is why you are seeing more domainers leasing or buying registrars for their personal use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I wish he would open up for transfers and registrations…I’d be there quick.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t speak for Frank Schilling but I&#8217;m positive<br />
Frank has NO interest in allowing others use his registrar.</p>
<p>His is the classic example of a &#8220;private registrar&#8221;.<br />
You will see more and more of those in the future.</p>
<p>Why would he want to allow others into his registrar?<br />
He doesn&#8217;t need your domain if you don&#8217;t renew it.<br />
He doesn&#8217;t need the few pennies gross profit from registering and renewing domains for others.<br />
He doesn&#8217;t need the extra, trival work.<br />
Nor, the need to hire more people to manage the domains and handle communications.</p>
<p>At this point, there is NO WAY a domain could be hi-jacked out of his registrar without his authorization.<br />
Domains are totally locked down from transfers out.<br />
The prevention of one hi-jacking pays for itself. </p>
<p>That is why you are seeing more domainers leasing or buying registrars for their personal use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

