<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Aftermarket Launches with Odd Name and Business Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/20/new-aftermarket-launches-with-odd-name-and-business-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/20/new-aftermarket-launches-with-odd-name-and-business-model/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 04:02:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Ohashi</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/20/new-aftermarket-launches-with-odd-name-and-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-287643</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Ohashi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3299#comment-287643</guid>
		<description>This has to be one of the most poorly conceived ideas coming to the domain market yet.  Double charging buyer and seller with no userbase to begin with?  You at least have to trick people into buying into the system before you screw them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has to be one of the most poorly conceived ideas coming to the domain market yet.  Double charging buyer and seller with no userbase to begin with?  You at least have to trick people into buying into the system before you screw them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Douglas</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/20/new-aftermarket-launches-with-odd-name-and-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-287073</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3299#comment-287073</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m ready for anyone with some time on their hands to help me finish developing out my bulk domain aftermarket site at http://www.bulksaledomains.com.  I have a unique selling idea for it, but if anyone wants more info and has some time to partner up, let me know.

As far as tldoffers.com, as long as they run a legit service, best of luck to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m ready for anyone with some time on their hands to help me finish developing out my bulk domain aftermarket site at <a href="http://www.bulksaledomains.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bulksaledomains.com</a>.  I have a unique selling idea for it, but if anyone wants more info and has some time to partner up, let me know.</p>
<p>As far as tldoffers.com, as long as they run a legit service, best of luck to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick McDermott</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/20/new-aftermarket-launches-with-odd-name-and-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-287030</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick McDermott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3299#comment-287030</guid>
		<description>&quot;@ Patrick - youâ€™re right. It makes it harder to understand, doesnâ€™t it?&quot;

Yep!

I suspect the person or persons that came up with TLDoffers.com think it&#039;s a good name.

This is just my guess but I also suspect that the person or persons that came up with that domain are not the same folk originally involved with the Perfect and WebPro domains.

Those two have been regged by the companies since 1994 and 1997 respectively.

TLDoffers.com was regged March 2008.

Whether TLDoffers.com is good or not good they did one thing right and that was to register the singular version also: TLDOffer.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;@ Patrick &#8211; youâ€™re right. It makes it harder to understand, doesnâ€™t it?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yep!</p>
<p>I suspect the person or persons that came up with TLDoffers.com think it&#8217;s a good name.</p>
<p>This is just my guess but I also suspect that the person or persons that came up with that domain are not the same folk originally involved with the Perfect and WebPro domains.</p>
<p>Those two have been regged by the companies since 1994 and 1997 respectively.</p>
<p>TLDoffers.com was regged March 2008.</p>
<p>Whether TLDoffers.com is good or not good they did one thing right and that was to register the singular version also: TLDOffer.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/20/new-aftermarket-launches-with-odd-name-and-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-286586</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3299#comment-286586</guid>
		<description>@ Patrick - you&#039;re right.  It makes it harder to understand, doesn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Patrick &#8211; you&#8217;re right.  It makes it harder to understand, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick McDermott</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/20/new-aftermarket-launches-with-odd-name-and-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-286575</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick McDermott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3299#comment-286575</guid>
		<description>&quot;The name threw me for a loop...&quot;

The names of their other companies listed under &quot;Who We Are&quot; are really good:

WebPro  - WebPro.com

Perfect Commerce - Perfect.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The name threw me for a loop&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>The names of their other companies listed under &#8220;Who We Are&#8221; are really good:</p>
<p>WebPro  &#8211; WebPro.com</p>
<p>Perfect Commerce &#8211; Perfect.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/20/new-aftermarket-launches-with-odd-name-and-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-286526</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3299#comment-286526</guid>
		<description>Adam - I considered not writing about it.  The name itself was going to be my topic, but then once I found out the business model I couldn&#039;t help myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam &#8211; I considered not writing about it.  The name itself was going to be my topic, but then once I found out the business model I couldn&#8217;t help myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/20/new-aftermarket-launches-with-odd-name-and-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-286521</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3299#comment-286521</guid>
		<description>woops . . . I meant names but their name is bad too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>woops . . . I meant names but their name is bad too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

