<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marchex Scales Back Domain Parking Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/20/marchex-scales-back-domain-parking-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/20/marchex-scales-back-domain-parking-service/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 04:02:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marchex shutting down domain parking program - Domain Name Wire</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/20/marchex-scales-back-domain-parking-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1584438</link>
		<dc:creator>Marchex shutting down domain parking program - Domain Name Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3295#comment-1584438</guid>
		<description>[...] but they&#8217;ve been in the process of scaling it back since at least 2008. In the first half of 2008 it grossed $5 million in revenues from its parking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] but they&#8217;ve been in the process of scaling it back since at least 2008. In the first half of 2008 it grossed $5 million in revenues from its parking [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/20/marchex-scales-back-domain-parking-service/comment-page-1/#comment-289439</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 01:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3295#comment-289439</guid>
		<description>The whole domain parking industry is so slimely and annoying that they may have just decided it wasn&#039;t worth the hassle.  It also detracted from the reputable aspects of their business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole domain parking industry is so slimely and annoying that they may have just decided it wasn&#8217;t worth the hassle.  It also detracted from the reputable aspects of their business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NameDrive Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ND Weekly #69</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/20/marchex-scales-back-domain-parking-service/comment-page-1/#comment-286804</link>
		<dc:creator>NameDrive Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; ND Weekly #69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3295#comment-286804</guid>
		<description>[...] Sitebox produced revenues of $5 million in the first half of the year, but less than $1.5 million in the third quarter. The company expects revenues to drop further to $0.5 million in the fourth quarter. During the companyâ€™s latest investor conference call, Marchex CEO Russell Horowitz said focusing on premium content partners and its own traffic sources provides greater relevance to its advertisers. More&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Sitebox produced revenues of $5 million in the first half of the year, but less than $1.5 million in the third quarter. The company expects revenues to drop further to $0.5 million in the fourth quarter. During the companyâ€™s latest investor conference call, Marchex CEO Russell Horowitz said focusing on premium content partners and its own traffic sources provides greater relevance to its advertisers. More&#8230; [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike @ WannaDevelop.com</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/20/marchex-scales-back-domain-parking-service/comment-page-1/#comment-286715</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike @ WannaDevelop.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3295#comment-286715</guid>
		<description>They probably shut it down due to &quot;FRAUD&quot; that is why most operations usually close shop... Or because it just wasn&#039;t successful enough. You will always see people FLOCK to a new service as it looks very promising and they say they can deliver this and pay that, etc... 

After a few weeks people login to check their stats and find out that they actually LOST money and that the service isn&#039;t what they first though... So they take their domains to the next service. There is a few dozen PPC parking companies so round and round they go.

After about a few month&#039;s, they hit their peak after some buzz... But it really quiets down fast and this services that are just a &quot;me-too&quot; product get forgotten.

Domaining 101... You are welcome.

Mike
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They probably shut it down due to &#8220;FRAUD&#8221; that is why most operations usually close shop&#8230; Or because it just wasn&#8217;t successful enough. You will always see people FLOCK to a new service as it looks very promising and they say they can deliver this and pay that, etc&#8230; </p>
<p>After a few weeks people login to check their stats and find out that they actually LOST money and that the service isn&#8217;t what they first though&#8230; So they take their domains to the next service. There is a few dozen PPC parking companies so round and round they go.</p>
<p>After about a few month&#8217;s, they hit their peak after some buzz&#8230; But it really quiets down fast and this services that are just a &#8220;me-too&#8221; product get forgotten.</p>
<p>Domaining 101&#8230; You are welcome.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FX</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/20/marchex-scales-back-domain-parking-service/comment-page-1/#comment-286695</link>
		<dc:creator>FX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3295#comment-286695</guid>
		<description>They couldn&#039;t make it profitable ??
Granted sitebox was a piece of shit with no stats, horrible landers and no real analytics technology behind it.  With that said, why shut it down ? Surely it can run itself and be profitable even at small scale.  end results, They simply DONT GET THE DOMAIN SPACE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They couldn&#8217;t make it profitable ??<br />
Granted sitebox was a piece of shit with no stats, horrible landers and no real analytics technology behind it.  With that said, why shut it down ? Surely it can run itself and be profitable even at small scale.  end results, They simply DONT GET THE DOMAIN SPACE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WQ</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/20/marchex-scales-back-domain-parking-service/comment-page-1/#comment-286572</link>
		<dc:creator>WQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3295#comment-286572</guid>
		<description>Probably too many well paid employees to make such a simple thing profitable.

Otherwise, this is really one of the easiest, most profitable businesses online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably too many well paid employees to make such a simple thing profitable.</p>
<p>Otherwise, this is really one of the easiest, most profitable businesses online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/20/marchex-scales-back-domain-parking-service/comment-page-1/#comment-286495</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3295#comment-286495</guid>
		<description>@ Johnny - you&#039;re right.  It seems they were getting better results from the content network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Johnny &#8211; you&#8217;re right.  It seems they were getting better results from the content network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

