<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BMEzine Files Response to BME.com Lawsuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/14/bmezine-files-response-to-bmecom-lawsuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/14/bmezine-files-response-to-bmecom-lawsuit/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:42:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chandan</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/14/bmezine-files-response-to-bmecom-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-509778</link>
		<dc:creator>chandan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3193#comment-509778</guid>
		<description>but the who is changed it seems now ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but the who is changed it seems now ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/14/bmezine-files-response-to-bmecom-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-452558</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 23:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3193#comment-452558</guid>
		<description>@ Curious - according to the court filings the case is still going on and is in discovery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Curious &#8211; according to the court filings the case is still going on and is in discovery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/14/bmezine-files-response-to-bmecom-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-452508</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3193#comment-452508</guid>
		<description>www.BME.com now forwards to www.BMEzine.com.

Does that mean that Greg Ricks lost the trial?
Or did they settle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.BME.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.BME.com</a> now forwards to <a href="http://www.BMEzine.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.BMEzine.com</a>.</p>
<p>Does that mean that Greg Ricks lost the trial?<br />
Or did they settle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raise, fight, profit or just enjoy&#8230; &#171; Aniareads Weblog</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/14/bmezine-files-response-to-bmecom-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-282735</link>
		<dc:creator>raise, fight, profit or just enjoy&#8230; &#171; Aniareads Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 16:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3193#comment-282735</guid>
		<description>[...] BMEzine vs. BME.com legal battle was already mentioned on here; their most recent clash is described here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] BMEzine vs. BME.com legal battle was already mentioned on here; their most recent clash is described here. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HA!</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/14/bmezine-files-response-to-bmecom-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-281295</link>
		<dc:creator>HA!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 03:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3193#comment-281295</guid>
		<description>Rachel could not legally claim she began BMEzine.com although she did claim to own 100% of it at the time of seizing it which was proven false.

What Rachel Larratt DID claim however, was that BMEzine.com was NOTHING prior to Shannon and her marriage in 2002. Also proven wrong on numerous occasions.

I too hope this Lawsuit obtained by Mr.Gregory Ricks sucks her dry of any and all financial gain she&#039;s received through her scam of a marriage. It&#039;s not like she&#039;s never put other companies under before or blew over a million in the course of a year.

Her frequent lies and deception in matters of her own health, child&#039;s well being, ownership of her ex-husbands company, employment record, friendships etc.. should leave Ricks with pretty well established grounds.

Eye for an eye.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel could not legally claim she began BMEzine.com although she did claim to own 100% of it at the time of seizing it which was proven false.</p>
<p>What Rachel Larratt DID claim however, was that BMEzine.com was NOTHING prior to Shannon and her marriage in 2002. Also proven wrong on numerous occasions.</p>
<p>I too hope this Lawsuit obtained by Mr.Gregory Ricks sucks her dry of any and all financial gain she&#8217;s received through her scam of a marriage. It&#8217;s not like she&#8217;s never put other companies under before or blew over a million in the course of a year.</p>
<p>Her frequent lies and deception in matters of her own health, child&#8217;s well being, ownership of her ex-husbands company, employment record, friendships etc.. should leave Ricks with pretty well established grounds.</p>
<p>Eye for an eye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/14/bmezine-files-response-to-bmecom-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-280343</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3193#comment-280343</guid>
		<description>Gerald, 

Your claims are laughable at best. No where have Rachel ever claimed that she started BME. Shannon Larratt claimed she said that but she never did and never would. As someone who actually has copies of the divorce paperwork, nothing in there says anything to the contrary. You should more like some uninformed drama hound. 

I guess Shannon being &quot;retired at 35&quot; and doing nothing but painting does nothing to indicate how much he was paid out from their divorce. The guy is set for life. All you have to do is ask him as he&#039;s a huge blabbermouth and will respond to anyone who sends him an inquiring email.

It doesn&#039;t matter who owns the real BME now, that&#039;s like saying that McDonald&#039;s loses it&#039;s trademark/copyright rights because it doesn&#039;t have the original owner. Go back to the watercooler and get some updated gossip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gerald, </p>
<p>Your claims are laughable at best. No where have Rachel ever claimed that she started BME. Shannon Larratt claimed she said that but she never did and never would. As someone who actually has copies of the divorce paperwork, nothing in there says anything to the contrary. You should more like some uninformed drama hound. </p>
<p>I guess Shannon being &#8220;retired at 35&#8243; and doing nothing but painting does nothing to indicate how much he was paid out from their divorce. The guy is set for life. All you have to do is ask him as he&#8217;s a huge blabbermouth and will respond to anyone who sends him an inquiring email.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter who owns the real BME now, that&#8217;s like saying that McDonald&#8217;s loses it&#8217;s trademark/copyright rights because it doesn&#8217;t have the original owner. Go back to the watercooler and get some updated gossip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Phrod</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/14/bmezine-files-response-to-bmecom-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-280236</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Phrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=3193#comment-280236</guid>
		<description>This lawsuit should be particularly funny to informed observers, as Rachel Larratt is not the original owner of the BME websites, and stole them herself from the original owner (her ex husband) through legal abuse and deception. The documents included in the linked post definitively label the property as being owned by &quot;Shannon Larratt&quot; (the ex husband and creator of the site in 1994, when she was only 13, who now has no involvement with the site). These are documents that she attempted to suppress when she was first claiming ownership of the site. Ironic that she clings to them now.

Greg Ricks would be doing himself a favor if he got his hands on their divorce paperwork.

What goes around comes around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This lawsuit should be particularly funny to informed observers, as Rachel Larratt is not the original owner of the BME websites, and stole them herself from the original owner (her ex husband) through legal abuse and deception. The documents included in the linked post definitively label the property as being owned by &#8220;Shannon Larratt&#8221; (the ex husband and creator of the site in 1994, when she was only 13, who now has no involvement with the site). These are documents that she attempted to suppress when she was first claiming ownership of the site. Ironic that she clings to them now.</p>
<p>Greg Ricks would be doing himself a favor if he got his hands on their divorce paperwork.</p>
<p>What goes around comes around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
