<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Going Offshore?  Watch Out for Australia, Too.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/10/30/going-offshore-watch-out-for-australia-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/10/30/going-offshore-watch-out-for-australia-too/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 04:02:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Protecting Your Domains - Going Offshore to Canada : Domain Bits</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/10/30/going-offshore-watch-out-for-australia-too/comment-page-1/#comment-273085</link>
		<dc:creator>Protecting Your Domains - Going Offshore to Canada : Domain Bits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2988#comment-273085</guid>
		<description>[...] of discussion in the domainersphere about what options are available, ranging from the Bahamas to Australia. However, I haven&#8217;t seen discussion about what I consider one of the best options - Canada - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] of discussion in the domainersphere about what options are available, ranging from the Bahamas to Australia. However, I haven&#8217;t seen discussion about what I consider one of the best options &#8211; Canada &#8211; [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/10/30/going-offshore-watch-out-for-australia-too/comment-page-1/#comment-271029</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 02:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2988#comment-271029</guid>
		<description>Steve, thanks.  I&#039;ve always wondered how their filters work.  I know they had a block on GoDaddy for a while.

Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, thanks.  I&#8217;ve always wondered how their filters work.  I know they had a block on GoDaddy for a while.</p>
<p>Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/10/30/going-offshore-watch-out-for-australia-too/comment-page-1/#comment-270957</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 22:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2988#comment-270957</guid>
		<description>looks like you can view domainnamewire.com in China.

Website Test Results
Tested From:	Hong Kong, China
Tested At:	2008-10-31
17:06:58 (GMT -05:00)
URL Tested:	http://domainnamewire.com
Resolved As:	67.228.232.114
Status:	OK
Response Time:	1.756 sec
DNS:	0.489 sec
Connect:	0.189 sec
Redirect:	0.000 sec
First Byte:	0.297 sec
Last Byte:	0.781 sec
Size:	47433 bytes

cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>looks like you can view domainnamewire.com in China.</p>
<p>Website Test Results<br />
Tested From:	Hong Kong, China<br />
Tested At:	2008-10-31<br />
17:06:58 (GMT -05:00)<br />
URL Tested:	<a href="http://domainnamewire.com" rel="nofollow">http://domainnamewire.com</a><br />
Resolved As:	67.228.232.114<br />
Status:	OK<br />
Response Time:	1.756 sec<br />
DNS:	0.489 sec<br />
Connect:	0.189 sec<br />
Redirect:	0.000 sec<br />
First Byte:	0.297 sec<br />
Last Byte:	0.781 sec<br />
Size:	47433 bytes</p>
<p>cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricardo</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/10/30/going-offshore-watch-out-for-australia-too/comment-page-1/#comment-270790</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2988#comment-270790</guid>
		<description>Michael&#039;s suggestion of using an offshore registrar is a valid point.

However, countries like the Bahamas and others also depend on U.S. toursit business.
So, if the U.S. govt wants assistance from one of the toursit destination countries, those countries tend to work closely with the U.S. govt.

I believe the Caymans because of their banking industry are a little more cautious about how they cooperate with the U.S. govt.

There are no perfect solutions.  We just have to weigh the pro&#039;s and con&#039;s of which foreign registrars we want to use for our domains. 

In some cases, it might be wiser to buy a U.S. registrar credential for your private use. Since, ultimately the domains (.com, .net, .org, .biz and .us) are still within reach of U.S. courts. But, you have more control on what is released from the registrar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael&#8217;s suggestion of using an offshore registrar is a valid point.</p>
<p>However, countries like the Bahamas and others also depend on U.S. toursit business.<br />
So, if the U.S. govt wants assistance from one of the toursit destination countries, those countries tend to work closely with the U.S. govt.</p>
<p>I believe the Caymans because of their banking industry are a little more cautious about how they cooperate with the U.S. govt.</p>
<p>There are no perfect solutions.  We just have to weigh the pro&#8217;s and con&#8217;s of which foreign registrars we want to use for our domains. </p>
<p>In some cases, it might be wiser to buy a U.S. registrar credential for your private use. Since, ultimately the domains (.com, .net, .org, .biz and .us) are still within reach of U.S. courts. But, you have more control on what is released from the registrar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/10/30/going-offshore-watch-out-for-australia-too/comment-page-1/#comment-270739</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2988#comment-270739</guid>
		<description>Lda - I realize you were the person suggesting Australia was a safe haven.  If you read the article I link to, you&#039;ll see this goes way beyond child pornography.

I think Michael Berkens is right.  If you feel the need to move your domains out of the U.S., move them to a place that has a reputation for not meddling in business.  Bahamas, Cayman, etc.  Any major country you go to will have the same result as the U.S.  And frankly, if you go outside the U.S. then you have to deal with not only the other country&#039;s regulations but ALSO the U.S. courts who will ultimately claim jurisdiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lda &#8211; I realize you were the person suggesting Australia was a safe haven.  If you read the article I link to, you&#8217;ll see this goes way beyond child pornography.</p>
<p>I think Michael Berkens is right.  If you feel the need to move your domains out of the U.S., move them to a place that has a reputation for not meddling in business.  Bahamas, Cayman, etc.  Any major country you go to will have the same result as the U.S.  And frankly, if you go outside the U.S. then you have to deal with not only the other country&#8217;s regulations but ALSO the U.S. courts who will ultimately claim jurisdiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lda</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/10/30/going-offshore-watch-out-for-australia-too/comment-page-1/#comment-270704</link>
		<dc:creator>Lda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2988#comment-270704</guid>
		<description>There was a time when this blog was a refreshing read, with regular &#039;scoops&#039; about news snippets.  

I find your take recently seems to have shifted to deliberate controversy, and in this case your headline is offensive.

Since when does the Australian government&#039;s (probably ill-fated) attempt to block child pornography justify your warning ??

Also what on earth does it have to do with courts stealing domains ?

If you have a realistic connection, based in fact, rather than childish speculation, perhaps you could share it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a time when this blog was a refreshing read, with regular &#8216;scoops&#8217; about news snippets.  </p>
<p>I find your take recently seems to have shifted to deliberate controversy, and in this case your headline is offensive.</p>
<p>Since when does the Australian government&#8217;s (probably ill-fated) attempt to block child pornography justify your warning ??</p>
<p>Also what on earth does it have to do with courts stealing domains ?</p>
<p>If you have a realistic connection, based in fact, rather than childish speculation, perhaps you could share it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/10/30/going-offshore-watch-out-for-australia-too/comment-page-1/#comment-270526</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 03:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2988#comment-270526</guid>
		<description>Keep in mind the average cost of a court case... if you want to challenge a Kentucky-esque seizure order, or challenge a udrp outcome... lots of places are cheaper than the US, even if they have unfamiliar or arcane rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind the average cost of a court case&#8230; if you want to challenge a Kentucky-esque seizure order, or challenge a udrp outcome&#8230; lots of places are cheaper than the US, even if they have unfamiliar or arcane rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

