<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Top Level Domain Names: Challenges and Opportunities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/10/21/new-top-level-domain-names-challenges-and-opportunities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/10/21/new-top-level-domain-names-challenges-and-opportunities/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:42:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Analysis: U.S. Government Has Domainers&#8217; Backs - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/10/21/new-top-level-domain-names-challenges-and-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-300464</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Analysis: U.S. Government Has Domainers&#8217; Backs - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 21:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2825#comment-300464</guid>
		<description>[...] probably read a lot about ICANN&#8217;s introduction of new top level domains. Now, as reported over at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] probably read a lot about ICANN&#8217;s introduction of new top level domains. Now, as reported over at [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; ICANN Releases Four Updates for New gTLDs - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/10/21/new-top-level-domain-names-challenges-and-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-266621</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; ICANN Releases Four Updates for New gTLDs - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2825#comment-266621</guid>
		<description>[...] U.S. Registrars? Not so Fast.Domaining.com Launching Expiring Domain Liquidation ServiceNew Top Level Domain Names: Challenges and OpportunitiesPay Attention: Domains are Selling for Cheap10 Ways You Can &quot;Boycott&quot; KentuckyAnother Example of Why [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] U.S. Registrars? Not so Fast.Domaining.com Launching Expiring Domain Liquidation ServiceNew Top Level Domain Names: Challenges and OpportunitiesPay Attention: Domains are Selling for Cheap10 Ways You Can &#8220;Boycott&#8221; KentuckyAnother Example of Why [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clayton Narcis</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/10/21/new-top-level-domain-names-challenges-and-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-266345</link>
		<dc:creator>Clayton Narcis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2825#comment-266345</guid>
		<description>Also i like to add that ICANN recently release a document that states 

&quot;Multiple applications for the same city name will require applicants to resolve
the contention among themselves (as with existing practice regarding
contested country code TLDs).&quot;

just thought i should share :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also i like to add that ICANN recently release a document that states </p>
<p>&#8220;Multiple applications for the same city name will require applicants to resolve<br />
the contention among themselves (as with existing practice regarding<br />
contested country code TLDs).&#8221;</p>
<p>just thought i should share <img src='http://domainnamewire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clayton Narcis</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/10/21/new-top-level-domain-names-challenges-and-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-266313</link>
		<dc:creator>Clayton Narcis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 08:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2825#comment-266313</guid>
		<description>There has been arguments over geo TLD based and ICANN is making it more difficult for gTLD applicant who wishes to apply geo TLD(s). 

link : http://www.domaininformer.com/news/press/081015TLDManagers.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been arguments over geo TLD based and ICANN is making it more difficult for gTLD applicant who wishes to apply geo TLD(s). </p>
<p>link : <a href="http://www.domaininformer.com/news/press/081015TLDManagers.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.domaininformer.com/news/press/081015TLDManagers.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J Castello</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/10/21/new-top-level-domain-names-challenges-and-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-265906</link>
		<dc:creator>David J Castello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2825#comment-265906</guid>
		<description>If anything, this will eventually enhance the value of dotCom because it will solidify its status as the default TLD when people try to remember an address out of a million different TLDs.

However, I can also see this wreaking confusion with ccTLDs. Take Germany for example. Will it be dotDE? dotGermany? dotDeutschland? dotGermania? 

Or will the countries pull rank with ICANN and not allow it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anything, this will eventually enhance the value of dotCom because it will solidify its status as the default TLD when people try to remember an address out of a million different TLDs.</p>
<p>However, I can also see this wreaking confusion with ccTLDs. Take Germany for example. Will it be dotDE? dotGermany? dotDeutschland? dotGermania? </p>
<p>Or will the countries pull rank with ICANN and not allow it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Jackson</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/10/21/new-top-level-domain-names-challenges-and-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-265884</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2825#comment-265884</guid>
		<description>.Com is king, and will reign forever.

New TLDs will definitely change the domain industry, but I can&#039;t foresee any major impact on the domain aftermarket.

The popular TLDs such as .com and .net will hold their ground. Any new TLD will mostly be taken up by end-users, rather than domainers registering in bulk and hoarding them.

Also, domain registrars may be selective in which TLD they choose to offer for sale, making it even harder to register some of the new TLDs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.Com is king, and will reign forever.</p>
<p>New TLDs will definitely change the domain industry, but I can&#8217;t foresee any major impact on the domain aftermarket.</p>
<p>The popular TLDs such as .com and .net will hold their ground. Any new TLD will mostly be taken up by end-users, rather than domainers registering in bulk and hoarding them.</p>
<p>Also, domain registrars may be selective in which TLD they choose to offer for sale, making it even harder to register some of the new TLDs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/10/21/new-top-level-domain-names-challenges-and-opportunities/comment-page-1/#comment-265866</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2825#comment-265866</guid>
		<description>One opportunity that crossed my mind lately is that perhaps a new tld will rise that is based offshore with the premise that it is a safe tld. This way you won&#039;t have to worry about the Steve Beshears of the world, at the registrar level, or the registry level. Then you could register BetFromKentucky.tld</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One opportunity that crossed my mind lately is that perhaps a new tld will rise that is based offshore with the premise that it is a safe tld. This way you won&#8217;t have to worry about the Steve Beshears of the world, at the registrar level, or the registry level. Then you could register BetFromKentucky.tld</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
