<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Editorial: How the Domain Industry Can Clean Itself Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/09/04/editorial-how-the-domain-industry-can-clean-itself-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/09/04/editorial-how-the-domain-industry-can-clean-itself-up/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:12:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dominalo.com</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/09/04/editorial-how-the-domain-industry-can-clean-itself-up/comment-page-1/#comment-243478</link>
		<dc:creator>dominalo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2229#comment-243478</guid>
		<description>This gotta stop, trademark domains should not be listed by dnjournal since there are all kind of readers worldwide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This gotta stop, trademark domains should not be listed by dnjournal since there are all kind of readers worldwide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NameDrive Blog &#187; Blog Archive</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/09/04/editorial-how-the-domain-industry-can-clean-itself-up/comment-page-1/#comment-232869</link>
		<dc:creator>NameDrive Blog &#187; Blog Archive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2229#comment-232869</guid>
		<description>[...] How the Domain Industry Can Clean Itself Up The domain business is a good business with a bad image. What can be done about it? Earlier today I read DNJournal’s weekly sales recap. There were some good sales, including RoomDividers.com at $75,000 (congratulations, Rick). But all of the good sales were overshadowed by a couple bad sales: Mozzilla.com for $40,000 and wwwMatch.com at $11,100. Neither of these domain names would stand a chance in UDRP challenges. Both of them are typos of famous web sites. These are the types of domain sales that make the industry look bad. More&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] How the Domain Industry Can Clean Itself Up The domain business is a good business with a bad image. What can be done about it? Earlier today I read DNJournal’s weekly sales recap. There were some good sales, including RoomDividers.com at $75,000 (congratulations, Rick). But all of the good sales were overshadowed by a couple bad sales: Mozzilla.com for $40,000 and wwwMatch.com at $11,100. Neither of these domain names would stand a chance in UDRP challenges. Both of them are typos of famous web sites. These are the types of domain sales that make the industry look bad. More&#8230; [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/09/04/editorial-how-the-domain-industry-can-clean-itself-up/comment-page-1/#comment-231465</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2229#comment-231465</guid>
		<description>Domisfera - thanks for the link.  Companies need to dedicate someone to managing domains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domisfera &#8211; thanks for the link.  Companies need to dedicate someone to managing domains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domisfera</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/09/04/editorial-how-the-domain-industry-can-clean-itself-up/comment-page-1/#comment-231451</link>
		<dc:creator>Domisfera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2229#comment-231451</guid>
		<description>Dear Shmackson, Ron is just transparent. Shows the market as it is.

By the way wwwmatch.com had a wipo in  2003 Match.com, L.P., v. Amjad Kausar 
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2003/d2003-0510.html

Match.com got that domain but did not renew it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Shmackson, Ron is just transparent. Shows the market as it is.</p>
<p>By the way wwwmatch.com had a wipo in  2003 Match.com, L.P., v. Amjad Kausar<br />
<a href="http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2003/d2003-0510.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2003/d2003-0510.html</a></p>
<p>Match.com got that domain but did not renew it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/09/04/editorial-how-the-domain-industry-can-clean-itself-up/comment-page-1/#comment-230789</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2229#comment-230789</guid>
		<description>jblack - I think 99% of the UDRPs are for people that got typos at reg fee or low cost.  I think you&#039;re right -- need to do it on the expensive domains.  If nothing else people won&#039;t want to report them :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jblack &#8211; I think 99% of the UDRPs are for people that got typos at reg fee or low cost.  I think you&#8217;re right &#8212; need to do it on the expensive domains.  If nothing else people won&#8217;t want to report them <img src='http://domainnamewire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jblack</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/09/04/editorial-how-the-domain-industry-can-clean-itself-up/comment-page-1/#comment-230782</link>
		<dc:creator>jblack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2229#comment-230782</guid>
		<description>Got your logic backwards dude.  The more TM infringement period, the more generics get WIPO&#039;d.  Decrease the infringers by stinging them with WIPO defeats, they will learn the lesson that its too expensive, not worth the risk etc.  Like the guys who just bought the high priced TM infringing names, should surprise no one when they get WIPO&#039;d.    Grab a broom or get out of the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got your logic backwards dude.  The more TM infringement period, the more generics get WIPO&#8217;d.  Decrease the infringers by stinging them with WIPO defeats, they will learn the lesson that its too expensive, not worth the risk etc.  Like the guys who just bought the high priced TM infringing names, should surprise no one when they get WIPO&#8217;d.    Grab a broom or get out of the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legisi.com</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/09/04/editorial-how-the-domain-industry-can-clean-itself-up/comment-page-1/#comment-230235</link>
		<dc:creator>Legisi.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2229#comment-230235</guid>
		<description>also the tm industry is also funding 90% of the &quot;generic&quot; sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also the tm industry is also funding 90% of the &#8220;generic&#8221; sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
