<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could Google Chrome Actually Be Good for Domainers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/09/04/could-google-chrome-actually-be-good-for-domainers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/09/04/could-google-chrome-actually-be-good-for-domainers/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:01:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larry C.</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/09/04/could-google-chrome-actually-be-good-for-domainers/comment-page-1/#comment-453784</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 17:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2225#comment-453784</guid>
		<description>I have to say this article was right on point with what my clients always do. typing their domain address in the search bar and vice versa. maybe I will recommend Chrome to all my clients...
great article thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say this article was right on point with what my clients always do. typing their domain address in the search bar and vice versa. maybe I will recommend Chrome to all my clients&#8230;<br />
great article thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Google Files Patent for Unified Address Bar/Search Box - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/09/04/could-google-chrome-actually-be-good-for-domainers/comment-page-1/#comment-310028</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Google Files Patent for Unified Address Bar/Search Box - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2225#comment-310028</guid>
		<description>[...] on direct navigation. If users become used to typing search queries into the address bar, it could boost direct navigation. However, some web browsers append .com to terms typed into the address box. For example, typing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] on direct navigation. If users become used to typing search queries into the address bar, it could boost direct navigation. However, some web browsers append .com to terms typed into the address box. For example, typing [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingdom media</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/09/04/could-google-chrome-actually-be-good-for-domainers/comment-page-1/#comment-243056</link>
		<dc:creator>kingdom media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 00:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2225#comment-243056</guid>
		<description>there are so many advantages and features with Chrome, such as it&#039;s speed, for example; now if only they would take care it&#039;s quirky cookie management...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are so many advantages and features with Chrome, such as it&#8217;s speed, for example; now if only they would take care it&#8217;s quirky cookie management&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adaid Internet Marketing</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/09/04/could-google-chrome-actually-be-good-for-domainers/comment-page-1/#comment-232541</link>
		<dc:creator>Adaid Internet Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2225#comment-232541</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think that Chrome is an excellent browser. Far better than Firefox. It still has a few features lacking but sheers speed of loading web pages is impressive, and I don&#039;t mind the incorporated navigation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think that Chrome is an excellent browser. Far better than Firefox. It still has a few features lacking but sheers speed of loading web pages is impressive, and I don&#8217;t mind the incorporated navigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/09/04/could-google-chrome-actually-be-good-for-domainers/comment-page-1/#comment-229981</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 10:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2225#comment-229981</guid>
		<description>Hmm

I think this is the thin end of the wedge and I think you hit the nail on the head when you said
&quot;But one thing’s for sure: the search engines want to get their hands on direct navigation traffic, and they don’t want to pay for it.&quot;

Like Knol, I&#039;m convinced google will steadily intorudce varied ways to manipulate search, now they know how to give you your search options, with chrome they now have a tool to also tell you where they (google) want you to go - or at the most subtle where they&#039;d like you to navigate to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm</p>
<p>I think this is the thin end of the wedge and I think you hit the nail on the head when you said<br />
&#8220;But one thing’s for sure: the search engines want to get their hands on direct navigation traffic, and they don’t want to pay for it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Like Knol, I&#8217;m convinced google will steadily intorudce varied ways to manipulate search, now they know how to give you your search options, with chrome they now have a tool to also tell you where they (google) want you to go &#8211; or at the most subtle where they&#8217;d like you to navigate to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/09/04/could-google-chrome-actually-be-good-for-domainers/comment-page-1/#comment-229488</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 01:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2225#comment-229488</guid>
		<description>&quot;any attempt at direct navigation will now be honored as long as a site exists at the typed-in address.&quot;

I wonder if this will hold true.

Google blocks many parked domains from appearing in their search results although the domain exists and you had typed in the domain with extension.

Would they all of a sudden allow parked domains to appear in the results?

Patrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;any attempt at direct navigation will now be honored as long as a site exists at the typed-in address.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wonder if this will hold true.</p>
<p>Google blocks many parked domains from appearing in their search results although the domain exists and you had typed in the domain with extension.</p>
<p>Would they all of a sudden allow parked domains to appear in the results?</p>
<p>Patrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
