<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .Org Domain Hit 7 Million Registrations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/25/org-domain-hit-7-million-registrations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/25/org-domain-hit-7-million-registrations/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 04:02:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Lange</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/25/org-domain-hit-7-million-registrations/comment-page-1/#comment-218265</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Lange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2086#comment-218265</guid>
		<description>There are still some very nice dot org domains available at very low prices, you do not have to look to hard to find them. I purchased DigitalProducts.org last year for reg cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are still some very nice dot org domains available at very low prices, you do not have to look to hard to find them. I purchased DigitalProducts.org last year for reg cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/25/org-domain-hit-7-million-registrations/comment-page-1/#comment-218186</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2086#comment-218186</guid>
		<description>Nihiltres - Agreed.  Just pointing out that popular .org&#039;s should also register the .com, but I didn&#039;t write it clearly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nihiltres &#8211; Agreed.  Just pointing out that popular .org&#8217;s should also register the .com, but I didn&#8217;t write it clearly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nihiltres</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/25/org-domain-hit-7-million-registrations/comment-page-1/#comment-218176</link>
		<dc:creator>Nihiltres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 20:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2086#comment-218176</guid>
		<description>&quot;True, although like many popular .org sites Wikipedia also owns Wikipedia.com.&quot;

This is a normal practice for prominent websites, *especially* high-profile ones such as Wikipedia. Allowing someone else to register that domain would allow for abuse, and keeping it allows for a redirect to the proper suffix, which is the case. I can&#039;t imagine a more natural situation; it doesn&#039;t compromise the integrity of the .org vision mentioned by Mr. Wales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;True, although like many popular .org sites Wikipedia also owns Wikipedia.com.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a normal practice for prominent websites, *especially* high-profile ones such as Wikipedia. Allowing someone else to register that domain would allow for abuse, and keeping it allows for a redirect to the proper suffix, which is the case. I can&#8217;t imagine a more natural situation; it doesn&#8217;t compromise the integrity of the .org vision mentioned by Mr. Wales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

