<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SMS Common Short Codes: A Domaining Like Opportunity?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/21/sms-common-short-codes-a-domaining-like-opportunity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/21/sms-common-short-codes-a-domaining-like-opportunity/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 04:02:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Yet Another Hurdle for New Top Level Domains - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/21/sms-common-short-codes-a-domaining-like-opportunity/comment-page-1/#comment-350683</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Yet Another Hurdle for New Top Level Domains - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2065#comment-350683</guid>
		<description>[...] kind of reminds me of mobile SMS short codes (e.g. text &#8220;VOTE&#8221; to 112233). Whenever someone registers a short code, they have to get [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] kind of reminds me of mobile SMS short codes (e.g. text &#8220;VOTE&#8221; to 112233). Whenever someone registers a short code, they have to get [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/21/sms-common-short-codes-a-domaining-like-opportunity/comment-page-1/#comment-237382</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2065#comment-237382</guid>
		<description>Pete, some people do say it only takes 4-6 weeks but I&#039;ve heard it can take a lot longer.  Also, the terms and conditions you agree to say they can deny a renewal.  If that were in the terms and conditions of domain names, we&#039;d all freak out :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete, some people do say it only takes 4-6 weeks but I&#8217;ve heard it can take a lot longer.  Also, the terms and conditions you agree to say they can deny a renewal.  If that were in the terms and conditions of domain names, we&#8217;d all freak out <img src='http://domainnamewire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/21/sms-common-short-codes-a-domaining-like-opportunity/comment-page-1/#comment-237366</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2065#comment-237366</guid>
		<description>This article has some misleading details, such as the time to get a short code approved. It only takes 4-6 weeks depending on the demand at the time. (I have done it) Also, the possibility of the CSCA denying a renewal of a operating short code would come with a serious legal battle which I am sure the CSCA would loose or have to pay damages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article has some misleading details, such as the time to get a short code approved. It only takes 4-6 weeks depending on the demand at the time. (I have done it) Also, the possibility of the CSCA denying a renewal of a operating short code would come with a serious legal battle which I am sure the CSCA would loose or have to pay damages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/21/sms-common-short-codes-a-domaining-like-opportunity/comment-page-1/#comment-226564</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 11:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2065#comment-226564</guid>
		<description>There is another similarity between shortcodes and domains in the US. If you operate a shortcode for a major TV advertised campaign, then as soon as you finish using it there&#039;s a good chance other operators (normally those running sketchy SMS chat services) will snap up your shortcode to catch residual traffic. Much like domainers can do with expired domains and their residual traffic/links.

Also, the US shortcode transfer process is somewhat akin to having your teeth pulled out, which I suspect is the CSC&#039;s attempt to prevent an aftermarket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is another similarity between shortcodes and domains in the US. If you operate a shortcode for a major TV advertised campaign, then as soon as you finish using it there&#8217;s a good chance other operators (normally those running sketchy SMS chat services) will snap up your shortcode to catch residual traffic. Much like domainers can do with expired domains and their residual traffic/links.</p>
<p>Also, the US shortcode transfer process is somewhat akin to having your teeth pulled out, which I suspect is the CSC&#8217;s attempt to prevent an aftermarket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: markus941</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/21/sms-common-short-codes-a-domaining-like-opportunity/comment-page-1/#comment-216045</link>
		<dc:creator>markus941</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2065#comment-216045</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the quick overview and insight. I think you&#039;re right - speculating on these is too expensive and gives you no certainty.

I like how you compared this to domaining (except with a lot more cons).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the quick overview and insight. I think you&#8217;re right &#8211; speculating on these is too expensive and gives you no certainty.</p>
<p>I like how you compared this to domaining (except with a lot more cons).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia Kaehler (DomainBELL)</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/21/sms-common-short-codes-a-domaining-like-opportunity/comment-page-1/#comment-215478</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Kaehler (DomainBELL)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 06:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2065#comment-215478</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d never heard the term &quot;short code&quot; till seeing your post...

Information appreciated...

Is there a directory or list somewhere that tells what short codes are currently in USE out there... and by who / for what ??

Thanks in advance...

  ~DomainBELL   (Patricia)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d never heard the term &#8220;short code&#8221; till seeing your post&#8230;</p>
<p>Information appreciated&#8230;</p>
<p>Is there a directory or list somewhere that tells what short codes are currently in USE out there&#8230; and by who / for what ??</p>
<p>Thanks in advance&#8230;</p>
<p>  ~DomainBELL   (Patricia)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/21/sms-common-short-codes-a-domaining-like-opportunity/comment-page-1/#comment-215214</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2065#comment-215214</guid>
		<description>I like them myself (which might explain why I own both in the .com; though most other extensions are still available for the time being). 

Used correctly, like most of the TV &quot;reality&quot; shows are doing, they are very powerful and effective marketing tools.

Certainly far better than having to repeat long phone numbers over and over again...with the requisite, &quot;...and remember, these are &#039;888&#039; ; not &#039;800&#039; or &#039;866&#039; numbers...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like them myself (which might explain why I own both in the .com; though most other extensions are still available for the time being). </p>
<p>Used correctly, like most of the TV &#8220;reality&#8221; shows are doing, they are very powerful and effective marketing tools.</p>
<p>Certainly far better than having to repeat long phone numbers over and over again&#8230;with the requisite, &#8220;&#8230;and remember, these are &#8217;888&#8242; ; not &#8217;800&#8242; or &#8217;866&#8242; numbers&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

