<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: September Modern Domainer Ships Next Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/20/september-modern-domainer-ships-next-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/20/september-modern-domainer-ships-next-week/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:07:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: john andrews</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/20/september-modern-domainer-ships-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-219309</link>
		<dc:creator>john andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 07:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2049#comment-219309</guid>
		<description>I contributed an article on SEO this time, and tried hard to make it meaningful for domainers. So much of &quot;SEO&quot; is fluff and talk. Perhaps I tried too hard, because I just re-read it and wow... it&#039;s pretty dense. I hope some find it useful.

I totally agree domainers could use actionable information, but I am also aware that these magazines are very young and domaining itself is very young. You guys set high expectations for yourselves. I don&#039;t think the typical &quot;top ten&quot; list stuff would go far with the domainer audience, and in competitive arenas like SEO (and domaining), there isn&#039;t much value in publishing secrets if widespread use would kill their value. It might take soem trial and error time to find the right perspective as Johnny B Good suggests above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I contributed an article on SEO this time, and tried hard to make it meaningful for domainers. So much of &#8220;SEO&#8221; is fluff and talk. Perhaps I tried too hard, because I just re-read it and wow&#8230; it&#8217;s pretty dense. I hope some find it useful.</p>
<p>I totally agree domainers could use actionable information, but I am also aware that these magazines are very young and domaining itself is very young. You guys set high expectations for yourselves. I don&#8217;t think the typical &#8220;top ten&#8221; list stuff would go far with the domainer audience, and in competitive arenas like SEO (and domaining), there isn&#8217;t much value in publishing secrets if widespread use would kill their value. It might take soem trial and error time to find the right perspective as Johnny B Good suggests above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/20/september-modern-domainer-ships-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-213987</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 19:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2049#comment-213987</guid>
		<description>Johnny, it&#039;s hard for a magazine to avoid the &quot;feature&quot; style writing because they only come our every month or two.  But I&#039;m sure Modern Domainer would welcome guest articles from people willing to write tutorials.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johnny, it&#8217;s hard for a magazine to avoid the &#8220;feature&#8221; style writing because they only come our every month or two.  But I&#8217;m sure Modern Domainer would welcome guest articles from people willing to write tutorials.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny B. Good</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/20/september-modern-domainer-ships-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-213963</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny B. Good</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2049#comment-213963</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of getting a domainer magazines but I seems to me that most of these magazines just have ads and an &quot;auction wrap-up&quot; with tons of photos.  That&#039;s all great and fun, but does anyone really learn anything from these magazines?  It just seems like these mags are just a who&#039;s who, fluff, ego-centric publications.

Has anything from these mags made me a better domainer? No.

I wish the tone of the mags was more serious with advanced techniques and methods at domain acquisitions. Or, more advance monetization methods, etc...... instead of the &quot;state of domaining&quot; or some other mundane subject.  Hell.... we already know the state of domaining.... just look at the payouts - I don&#039;t need reminding.

I don&#039;t think Kevin Ham can tell most of us domainers much about domaining b/c he has millions to play with and just goes to the big auctions, but a domainer who has his hands dirty and it scouring for new venues for monetization or has developed new domaining abilities that he or she is willing to share is much more interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of getting a domainer magazines but I seems to me that most of these magazines just have ads and an &#8220;auction wrap-up&#8221; with tons of photos.  That&#8217;s all great and fun, but does anyone really learn anything from these magazines?  It just seems like these mags are just a who&#8217;s who, fluff, ego-centric publications.</p>
<p>Has anything from these mags made me a better domainer? No.</p>
<p>I wish the tone of the mags was more serious with advanced techniques and methods at domain acquisitions. Or, more advance monetization methods, etc&#8230;&#8230; instead of the &#8220;state of domaining&#8221; or some other mundane subject.  Hell&#8230;. we already know the state of domaining&#8230;. just look at the payouts &#8211; I don&#8217;t need reminding.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Kevin Ham can tell most of us domainers much about domaining b/c he has millions to play with and just goes to the big auctions, but a domainer who has his hands dirty and it scouring for new venues for monetization or has developed new domaining abilities that he or she is willing to share is much more interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Parks</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/08/20/september-modern-domainer-ships-next-week/comment-page-1/#comment-213955</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Parks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 18:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=2049#comment-213955</guid>
		<description>Awesome..  Looking forward to checking it out. Congratulations on the spotlight. It&#039;s well deserved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome..  Looking forward to checking it out. Congratulations on the spotlight. It&#8217;s well deserved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
