<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future Media Architects Prevails Against Equifax for EFX.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/07/30/future-media-architects-prevails-against-equifax-for-efxcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/07/30/future-media-architects-prevails-against-equifax-for-efxcom/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 04:02:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynda</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/07/30/future-media-architects-prevails-against-equifax-for-efxcom/comment-page-1/#comment-709225</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=1848#comment-709225</guid>
		<description>Noted the LH.com decision hasn&#039;t been overturned, as www.lh.com takes you to www.lufthansa.com

This subject has caught my attention.  What I&#039;ve read piqued my interest in Future Media Architects.  Anybody know anyone with FMA?  I&#039;d like to meet him or her.
www.fma.com

-Lynda

Oh hey, did anybody ever answer the question posed a couple years back asking what is the eligibility criteria for becoming a UDRP panelist?  I&#039;d like to know as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noted the LH.com decision hasn&#8217;t been overturned, as <a href="http://www.lh.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lh.com</a> takes you to <a href="http://www.lufthansa.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lufthansa.com</a></p>
<p>This subject has caught my attention.  What I&#8217;ve read piqued my interest in Future Media Architects.  Anybody know anyone with FMA?  I&#8217;d like to meet him or her.<br />
<a href="http://www.fma.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.fma.com</a></p>
<p>-Lynda</p>
<p>Oh hey, did anybody ever answer the question posed a couple years back asking what is the eligibility criteria for becoming a UDRP panelist?  I&#8217;d like to know as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/07/30/future-media-architects-prevails-against-equifax-for-efxcom/comment-page-1/#comment-624320</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 09:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=1848#comment-624320</guid>
		<description>Did FMA lose the case in court ? LH.com is now owned by Lufthansa.
http://whois.domaintools.com/lh.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did FMA lose the case in court ? LH.com is now owned by Lufthansa.<br />
<a href="http://whois.domaintools.com/lh.com" rel="nofollow">http://whois.domaintools.com/lh.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Wicked Fashions Thinks it Owns The South Pole (.com) - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/07/30/future-media-architects-prevails-against-equifax-for-efxcom/comment-page-1/#comment-200669</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Wicked Fashions Thinks it Owns The South Pole (.com) - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=1848#comment-200669</guid>
		<description>[...] Entries Wicked Fashions Thinks it Owns The South Pole (.com)Future Media Architects Prevails Against Equifax for EFX.comDomain Watch: Entrepreneur Magazine, .Mobi Research5 Best Domain Name Company Acquisitions Matt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Entries Wicked Fashions Thinks it Owns The South Pole (.com)Future Media Architects Prevails Against Equifax for EFX.comDomain Watch: Entrepreneur Magazine, .Mobi Research5 Best Domain Name Company Acquisitions Matt [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/07/30/future-media-architects-prevails-against-equifax-for-efxcom/comment-page-1/#comment-200646</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=1848#comment-200646</guid>
		<description>Kelly, I&#039;ll ask Enrico and Traverse if he can write an article about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kelly, I&#8217;ll ask Enrico and Traverse if he can write an article about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly lieberman</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/07/30/future-media-architects-prevails-against-equifax-for-efxcom/comment-page-1/#comment-200508</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly lieberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=1848#comment-200508</guid>
		<description>Andrew,
Can you follow up on your post with an article on UDRP panelists?  It looks like we are all wondering the  same thing about credentials....
I wonder if Traverse Legal would know anything?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,<br />
Can you follow up on your post with an article on UDRP panelists?  It looks like we are all wondering the  same thing about credentials&#8230;.<br />
I wonder if Traverse Legal would know anything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lda</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/07/30/future-media-architects-prevails-against-equifax-for-efxcom/comment-page-1/#comment-200442</link>
		<dc:creator>Lda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=1848#comment-200442</guid>
		<description>A Dot-Com is a world TLD, not U.S.  It is curious that these bandits would go after the world domain when they don&#039;t even own the .US version.  EFX.us is presently for sale.

Any entity that goes after a world TLD without owning a WIPO international trademark under the Madrid protocols should be ruled ineligible immediately by WIPO panels.

To think that a U.S. stock exchange ticker symbol could be the basis for world TLD asset theft is beyond nonsensical.

Just think of the consequences of a win there... a company anywhere in the world would theoretically have the right (albeit &quot;unregistered&quot;) to claim world TLDs !!!

Madness.  

WIPO should immediately rethink their UDRP decision guidelines, if any exist, as a matter of urgency.

It can&#039;t be left to the whim of untrained panel members, there&#039;s too much at stake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Dot-Com is a world TLD, not U.S.  It is curious that these bandits would go after the world domain when they don&#8217;t even own the .US version.  EFX.us is presently for sale.</p>
<p>Any entity that goes after a world TLD without owning a WIPO international trademark under the Madrid protocols should be ruled ineligible immediately by WIPO panels.</p>
<p>To think that a U.S. stock exchange ticker symbol could be the basis for world TLD asset theft is beyond nonsensical.</p>
<p>Just think of the consequences of a win there&#8230; a company anywhere in the world would theoretically have the right (albeit &#8220;unregistered&#8221;) to claim world TLDs !!!</p>
<p>Madness.  </p>
<p>WIPO should immediately rethink their UDRP decision guidelines, if any exist, as a matter of urgency.</p>
<p>It can&#8217;t be left to the whim of untrained panel members, there&#8217;s too much at stake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DR. DOMAIN</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/07/30/future-media-architects-prevails-against-equifax-for-efxcom/comment-page-1/#comment-200418</link>
		<dc:creator>DR. DOMAIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=1848#comment-200418</guid>
		<description>Way to hang tough FMA.Equifax tried to bully &amp; got that jaw jacked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to hang tough FMA.Equifax tried to bully &amp; got that jaw jacked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

