<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ICANN Fee Rule Change Won&#8217;t End Domain Tasting, Frontrunning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/30/icann-fee-rule-change-wont-end-domain-tasting-frontrunning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/30/icann-fee-rule-change-wont-end-domain-tasting-frontrunning/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:15:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; NameKing Still King of Domain Tasting - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/30/icann-fee-rule-change-wont-end-domain-tasting-frontrunning/comment-page-1/#comment-311067</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; NameKing Still King of Domain Tasting - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/30/icann-fee-rule-change-wont-end-domain-tasting-frontrunning/#comment-311067</guid>
		<description>[...] continues to drop nearly 1 million .com domains during the add grace period each month. As I predicted, ICANN&#8217;s budget measure to stem domain tasting curtailed the practice but did not eliminate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] continues to drop nearly 1 million .com domains during the add grace period each month. As I predicted, ICANN&#8217;s budget measure to stem domain tasting curtailed the practice but did not eliminate [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/30/icann-fee-rule-change-wont-end-domain-tasting-frontrunning/comment-page-1/#comment-189019</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/30/icann-fee-rule-change-wont-end-domain-tasting-frontrunning/#comment-189019</guid>
		<description>Dear Valued Customer,

As you may be aware, ICANN recently imposed a new fee of $.20 for each domain registered then deleted within the four day grace period.  As a result, the rate for domains returned during the four day grace period has increased by $.20 per domain effective July 1, 2008.

Thank you for your continued business.

The Moniker Team</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Valued Customer,</p>
<p>As you may be aware, ICANN recently imposed a new fee of $.20 for each domain registered then deleted within the four day grace period.  As a result, the rate for domains returned during the four day grace period has increased by $.20 per domain effective July 1, 2008.</p>
<p>Thank you for your continued business.</p>
<p>The Moniker Team</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/30/icann-fee-rule-change-wont-end-domain-tasting-frontrunning/comment-page-1/#comment-187980</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/30/icann-fee-rule-change-wont-end-domain-tasting-frontrunning/#comment-187980</guid>
		<description>Anyone know when the new rule / .20 cent fee becomes active?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know when the new rule / .20 cent fee becomes active?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/30/icann-fee-rule-change-wont-end-domain-tasting-frontrunning/comment-page-1/#comment-187973</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/30/icann-fee-rule-change-wont-end-domain-tasting-frontrunning/#comment-187973</guid>
		<description>Changed story to say &quot;moved a step further to changing&quot;, as 2w pointed out everything is not signed, sealed, and delivered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Changed story to say &#8220;moved a step further to changing&#8221;, as 2w pointed out everything is not signed, sealed, and delivered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/30/icann-fee-rule-change-wont-end-domain-tasting-frontrunning/comment-page-1/#comment-187971</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/30/icann-fee-rule-change-wont-end-domain-tasting-frontrunning/#comment-187971</guid>
		<description>@ 2w - yes and no, the way I understand it...I&#039;ve looked into it.  It looks like the board approved the rule blocking refunds for domain names over 50 or 10% in a given month, which would seem to be even more costly than CADNA suggests.  But the budget, which includes the fee rule, still needs to be approved, so you&#039;re right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 2w &#8211; yes and no, the way I understand it&#8230;I&#8217;ve looked into it.  It looks like the board approved the rule blocking refunds for domain names over 50 or 10% in a given month, which would seem to be even more costly than CADNA suggests.  But the budget, which includes the fee rule, still needs to be approved, so you&#8217;re right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2w</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/30/icann-fee-rule-change-wont-end-domain-tasting-frontrunning/comment-page-1/#comment-187957</link>
		<dc:creator>2w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/30/icann-fee-rule-change-wont-end-domain-tasting-frontrunning/#comment-187957</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; @ 2w - approved last week

first thanks for your promptresponse

but , 
&#039;the approval is still to b approved 
by &#039;the board of ICANN , 

isnt it ?

cheers thank ye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; @ 2w &#8211; approved last week</p>
<p>first thanks for your promptresponse</p>
<p>but ,<br />
&#8216;the approval is still to b approved<br />
by &#8216;the board of ICANN , </p>
<p>isnt it ?</p>
<p>cheers thank ye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/30/icann-fee-rule-change-wont-end-domain-tasting-frontrunning/comment-page-1/#comment-187953</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/30/icann-fee-rule-change-wont-end-domain-tasting-frontrunning/#comment-187953</guid>
		<description>@ 2w - approved last week</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ 2w &#8211; approved last week</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

