<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Premium .Mobi Domain Names Still Out of Compliance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/03/premium-mobi-domain-names-still-out-of-compliance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/03/premium-mobi-domain-names-still-out-of-compliance/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doodlove</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/03/premium-mobi-domain-names-still-out-of-compliance/comment-page-1/#comment-383618</link>
		<dc:creator>Doodlove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/03/premium-mobi-domain-names-still-out-of-compliance/#comment-383618</guid>
		<description>Just another useless domain extention in an endless sea of useless extentions. Everyone with half a brain just makes their traditional .com browser/device detect correctly and format to suit. Just a money making idea this .mobi junk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just another useless domain extention in an endless sea of useless extentions. Everyone with half a brain just makes their traditional .com browser/device detect correctly and format to suit. Just a money making idea this .mobi junk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/03/premium-mobi-domain-names-still-out-of-compliance/comment-page-1/#comment-374014</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/03/premium-mobi-domain-names-still-out-of-compliance/#comment-374014</guid>
		<description>mobi should be far more established by now. Some of their policies seem to achieve the opposite of what they are meant to do. I suspect that their decision makers are their own worst enemies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mobi should be far more established by now. Some of their policies seem to achieve the opposite of what they are meant to do. I suspect that their decision makers are their own worst enemies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; dotMobi Steps Up Enforcement for Non-Compliant Domain Names - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/03/premium-mobi-domain-names-still-out-of-compliance/comment-page-1/#comment-345981</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; dotMobi Steps Up Enforcement for Non-Compliant Domain Names - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/03/premium-mobi-domain-names-still-out-of-compliance/#comment-345981</guid>
		<description>[...] written several times about lack of enforcement of dotMobi&#8217;s premium domain buyer rules, but the registry finally started taking action last [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] written several times about lack of enforcement of dotMobi&#8217;s premium domain buyer rules, but the registry finally started taking action last [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; dotMobi to Enforce Compliance Rules for Premium Domains (Eventually) - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/03/premium-mobi-domain-names-still-out-of-compliance/comment-page-1/#comment-227526</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; dotMobi to Enforce Compliance Rules for Premium Domains (Eventually) - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 13:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/03/premium-mobi-domain-names-still-out-of-compliance/#comment-227526</guid>
		<description>[...] second article about premium dotMobi domain names that were won at auctions at Sedo . At the time, not a single domain won at the first Sedo auction was in compliance. Compliance basically requires a dotMobi compatible parking page followed by a mobile web site [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] second article about premium dotMobi domain names that were won at auctions at Sedo . At the time, not a single domain won at the first Sedo auction was in compliance. Compliance basically requires a dotMobi compatible parking page followed by a mobile web site [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/03/premium-mobi-domain-names-still-out-of-compliance/comment-page-1/#comment-181606</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/03/premium-mobi-domain-names-still-out-of-compliance/#comment-181606</guid>
		<description>As the owner of a substantial (largely developed) portfolio of mobi sites, I am disappointed about the apparent lack of making an effort to enforce development policy (although more than 6 months can be needed) as well as hoarding premium domains and at times releasing some through private contracts as was the case with capital city names and world mobi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the owner of a substantial (largely developed) portfolio of mobi sites, I am disappointed about the apparent lack of making an effort to enforce development policy (although more than 6 months can be needed) as well as hoarding premium domains and at times releasing some through private contracts as was the case with capital city names and world mobi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fordy</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/03/premium-mobi-domain-names-still-out-of-compliance/comment-page-1/#comment-180270</link>
		<dc:creator>fordy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 21:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/03/premium-mobi-domain-names-still-out-of-compliance/#comment-180270</guid>
		<description>The restrictions are interesting. I wonder if they&#039;ll be enforced. Also I wonder if I should include .mobi domains on my page (&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.domainnamesoup.com/available-domain-names.php&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Available Domain Names&lt;/a&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The restrictions are interesting. I wonder if they&#8217;ll be enforced. Also I wonder if I should include .mobi domains on my page (<a href='http://www.domainnamesoup.com/available-domain-names.php' rel="nofollow">Available Domain Names</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/03/premium-mobi-domain-names-still-out-of-compliance/comment-page-1/#comment-179659</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/06/03/premium-mobi-domain-names-still-out-of-compliance/#comment-179659</guid>
		<description>Little more than additional .mobi false hopes, broken promises, corporate-speak, and obfuscation...

You want to see more development on this ill-fated extension?

Take back a few high-profile ones from those who&#039;ve not done what they agreed to do when they bought them...and resell them to others...if you dare.

Then watch the legal fur fly.

ps You state, &quot;Even the naysayers are changing their minds about the domain.&quot;

And just which naysayers are those?

Care to name some?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Little more than additional .mobi false hopes, broken promises, corporate-speak, and obfuscation&#8230;</p>
<p>You want to see more development on this ill-fated extension?</p>
<p>Take back a few high-profile ones from those who&#8217;ve not done what they agreed to do when they bought them&#8230;and resell them to others&#8230;if you dare.</p>
<p>Then watch the legal fur fly.</p>
<p>ps You state, &#8220;Even the naysayers are changing their minds about the domain.&#8221;</p>
<p>And just which naysayers are those?</p>
<p>Care to name some?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
