Comments on: Verizon Sued Over Error Redirects

By: Verizon Wins $33 Million in Cybersquatting Case | The domain industry's news source

Thu, 25 Dec 2008 02:38:10 +0000

[...] as they use “error services” to show ads on typo domains. In fact, Navigation Catalyst counter-sued based on this error service. It appears that the countersuit may have helped Navigation Catalyst, [...]

By: Domain Name Wire » News » Verizon Wins $33 Million in Cybersquatting Case - The Domain Industry's News Source

Wed, 24 Dec 2008 16:37:10 +0000

[...] as they use “error services” to show ads on typo domains. In fact, Navigation Catalyst counter-sued based on this error [...]

By: Steve M

Steve M — Wed, 28 May 2008 00:40:27 +0000

Those who live in glass houses should not be throwing rocks at others.

Will be good to see what a/the court/s say about these “redirects.”

By: Brian

Brian — Tue, 27 May 2008 22:59:24 +0000

Nice post, seems like the only ones who win in this case will be Google/Yahoo as there ads appear at either result.

By: Johnny

Johnny — Tue, 27 May 2008 22:45:02 +0000

It’s about time this was brought to light in the courts.

If we could get them all to stop doing this then generic domains would benefit since they might regain some of their original traffic that was taken away from them.

By: Andrew

Andrew — Tue, 27 May 2008 19:10:08 +0000

In a Modern Domainer article earlier this year, Verizon objected to Phil’s claim that its serve is much like typosquatting, saying that what they offer is “a service”. Funny.

By: David J Castello

David J Castello — Tue, 27 May 2008 19:08:40 +0000

I bet Phil Corwin and Michael Collins are smiling.