<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube Chases Down YouTube.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/04/youtube-chases-down-youtubenet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/04/youtube-chases-down-youtubenet/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:17:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Youtube tras youtube.net</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/04/youtube-chases-down-youtubenet/comment-page-1/#comment-166143</link>
		<dc:creator>Youtube tras youtube.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 17:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/04/youtube-chases-down-youtubenet/#comment-166143</guid>
		<description>[...] el equipo legal de Google está gestionando la recuperación del dominio que, según su whois, pertenece a alguien de China. Desde Google se comenta: We seek to recover [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] el equipo legal de Google está gestionando la recuperación del dominio que, según su whois, pertenece a alguien de China. Desde Google se comenta: We seek to recover [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/04/youtube-chases-down-youtubenet/comment-page-1/#comment-165992</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 01:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/04/youtube-chases-down-youtubenet/#comment-165992</guid>
		<description>@Antoinette - Given that they probably reached out to the person before filing the UDRP, they probably didn&#039;t receive a satisfactory response.  A lot of companies don&#039;t want to pay anything for domains they can get in UDRP because it sends the wrong message -- go ahead and buy our trademark domains and then we&#039;ll pay you a modest fee to get them back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Antoinette &#8211; Given that they probably reached out to the person before filing the UDRP, they probably didn&#8217;t receive a satisfactory response.  A lot of companies don&#8217;t want to pay anything for domains they can get in UDRP because it sends the wrong message &#8212; go ahead and buy our trademark domains and then we&#8217;ll pay you a modest fee to get them back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antoinette</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/04/youtube-chases-down-youtubenet/comment-page-1/#comment-165902</link>
		<dc:creator>Antoinette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/04/youtube-chases-down-youtubenet/#comment-165902</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s just me but it seems like a lot less trouble to just buy the name, then they could do an immediate transfer of ownership. But it seems like some corporate domain owners would rather pay lawyers and wait months for the case to make its way through the courts. 

I understand that there would be a problem if YouTube.net was asking for an obscene amount of money. But I wonder if YouTube.com even made an offer to them before going to seek a ruling in it favor. I mean, how much is YouTube worth, millions? They&#039;ll pay more in legal fees than they would if they would just buy out the YouTube.net owner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just me but it seems like a lot less trouble to just buy the name, then they could do an immediate transfer of ownership. But it seems like some corporate domain owners would rather pay lawyers and wait months for the case to make its way through the courts. </p>
<p>I understand that there would be a problem if YouTube.net was asking for an obscene amount of money. But I wonder if YouTube.com even made an offer to them before going to seek a ruling in it favor. I mean, how much is YouTube worth, millions? They&#8217;ll pay more in legal fees than they would if they would just buy out the YouTube.net owner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demexii</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/04/youtube-chases-down-youtubenet/comment-page-1/#comment-165801</link>
		<dc:creator>Demexii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 06:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/04/youtube-chases-down-youtubenet/#comment-165801</guid>
		<description>Youtube.net is going to be lost. Google owns the youtube trademark and it has to do with domain names so there is no way a court won&#039;t hand it over. Hell, courts have handed it over when there was less support than Google has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Youtube.net is going to be lost. Google owns the youtube trademark and it has to do with domain names so there is no way a court won&#8217;t hand it over. Hell, courts have handed it over when there was less support than Google has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/04/youtube-chases-down-youtubenet/comment-page-1/#comment-165726</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 00:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/04/youtube-chases-down-youtubenet/#comment-165726</guid>
		<description>YouTube.net&#039;s sunk. 

Even if; by some miracle; they prevailed w/the UDRP, Google will just take it from them in a US courtroom instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube.net&#8217;s sunk. </p>
<p>Even if; by some miracle; they prevailed w/the UDRP, Google will just take it from them in a US courtroom instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J Castello</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/04/youtube-chases-down-youtubenet/comment-page-1/#comment-165666</link>
		<dc:creator>David J Castello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/04/youtube-chases-down-youtubenet/#comment-165666</guid>
		<description>The nail in the coffin for YouTube.net is that it is a unique phrase registered after YouTube.com.

They&#039;re not going to get around a Bad Faith ruling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nail in the coffin for YouTube.net is that it is a unique phrase registered after YouTube.com.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re not going to get around a Bad Faith ruling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Green</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/04/youtube-chases-down-youtubenet/comment-page-1/#comment-165624</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 15:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/04/04/youtube-chases-down-youtubenet/#comment-165624</guid>
		<description>Goes to show you that you never really know the value of a domain name until a unique idea takes off, gets traffic!

Youtube.com was only registered approx 26 mths ago! I wonder how many domainers thought about grabbing that name but didn&#039;t jump on the idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goes to show you that you never really know the value of a domain name until a unique idea takes off, gets traffic!</p>
<p>Youtube.com was only registered approx 26 mths ago! I wonder how many domainers thought about grabbing that name but didn&#8217;t jump on the idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
