<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leggo My Eggo!  Kellogg Loses Domain Dispute</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/18/leggo-my-eggo-kellogg-loses-domain-dispute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/18/leggo-my-eggo-kellogg-loses-domain-dispute/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:25:12 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/18/leggo-my-eggo-kellogg-loses-domain-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-319870</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/18/leggo-my-eggo-kellogg-loses-domain-dispute/#comment-319870</guid>
		<description>@ Waffled - this is from the panel: &quot;According to Respondent, the name was selected because of its closeness to Egg – a Barcelona design firm and business partner and because it contains the initials “gg,” which correspond to the initials of the company’s founder, Gregor Gimmy&quot;

In a UDRP if you prove that you had some sort of right or legitimate interest in the domain, then you will prevail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Waffled &#8211; this is from the panel: &#8220;According to Respondent, the name was selected because of its closeness to Egg – a Barcelona design firm and business partner and because it contains the initials “gg,” which correspond to the initials of the company’s founder, Gregor Gimmy&#8221;</p>
<p>In a UDRP if you prove that you had some sort of right or legitimate interest in the domain, then you will prevail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waffled</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/18/leggo-my-eggo-kellogg-loses-domain-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-319855</link>
		<dc:creator>Waffled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/18/leggo-my-eggo-kellogg-loses-domain-dispute/#comment-319855</guid>
		<description>&quot;Eggo&quot; is a term invented and marketed by Kellogg, right?  So how can someone else come along and be able to use that same made-up term for a business unrelated to food?  Isn&#039;t it like DBA &quot;Microsoft Auto Sales&quot; or &quot;iPod Plumbing and Heating&quot;, right?  You can&#039;t do that, can you?

Using a term like &quot;Eggo&quot; which is already well-established in people&#039;s minds thanks to the efforts of Kellogg&#039;s and which conjures up images of frozen waffles, seems to me to be an obvious infringement of a TM, even if used for something totally unrelated like &quot;consulting&quot;.

&quot;Eggo Consulting?  Like the breakfast food Eggo waffles?&quot;

&quot;Yeah, just like the waffles, except we&#039;re a consulting company&quot;.

Could someone please explain this to me, as I don&#039;t seem to quite get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Eggo&#8221; is a term invented and marketed by Kellogg, right?  So how can someone else come along and be able to use that same made-up term for a business unrelated to food?  Isn&#8217;t it like DBA &#8220;Microsoft Auto Sales&#8221; or &#8220;iPod Plumbing and Heating&#8221;, right?  You can&#8217;t do that, can you?</p>
<p>Using a term like &#8220;Eggo&#8221; which is already well-established in people&#8217;s minds thanks to the efforts of Kellogg&#8217;s and which conjures up images of frozen waffles, seems to me to be an obvious infringement of a TM, even if used for something totally unrelated like &#8220;consulting&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Eggo Consulting?  Like the breakfast food Eggo waffles?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Yeah, just like the waffles, except we&#8217;re a consulting company&#8221;.</p>
<p>Could someone please explain this to me, as I don&#8217;t seem to quite get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harmony</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/18/leggo-my-eggo-kellogg-loses-domain-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-176846</link>
		<dc:creator>harmony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 16:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/18/leggo-my-eggo-kellogg-loses-domain-dispute/#comment-176846</guid>
		<description>good web site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good web site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Buzz: This Week in Domaining &#124; Bargain Domains Direct</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/18/leggo-my-eggo-kellogg-loses-domain-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-164619</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Buzz: This Week in Domaining &#124; Bargain Domains Direct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 02:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/18/leggo-my-eggo-kellogg-loses-domain-dispute/#comment-164619</guid>
		<description>[...] Leggo My Eggo.com!: &#8220;Kellogg North America Company, which sells frozen waffles under the “Eggo” brand, has lost a domain dispute for the domain Eggo.com.&#8220; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Leggo My Eggo.com!: &#8220;Kellogg North America Company, which sells frozen waffles under the “Eggo” brand, has lost a domain dispute for the domain Eggo.com.&#8220; [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Buzz: This Week in Domaining</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/18/leggo-my-eggo-kellogg-loses-domain-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-163152</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Buzz: This Week in Domaining</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/18/leggo-my-eggo-kellogg-loses-domain-dispute/#comment-163152</guid>
		<description>[...] Leggo My Eggo.com!: &#8220;Kellogg North America Company, which sells frozen waffles under the “Eggo” brand, has lost a domain dispute for the domain Eggo.com.&#8220; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Leggo My Eggo.com!: &#8220;Kellogg North America Company, which sells frozen waffles under the “Eggo” brand, has lost a domain dispute for the domain Eggo.com.&#8220; [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick McDermott</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/18/leggo-my-eggo-kellogg-loses-domain-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-162055</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick McDermott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 03:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/18/leggo-my-eggo-kellogg-loses-domain-dispute/#comment-162055</guid>
		<description>&quot;Won’t surprise me if Kellogg takes this to US court; where they’re sure to raise 5-10 “reasons” why they’re entitles to take (steal) this domain from the rightful owners.&quot;

Steve,

If Kellogg went that route there are provisions for countersuing.

Clearly the company operating Eggo.com is not infringing Kellogg&#039;s TM.

If Kellogg ever succeeded in wresting the domain away via court order - then watch out!

All hell would break loose in Domainland.

No one would be safe.

Domainer or anyone else.

Patrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Won’t surprise me if Kellogg takes this to US court; where they’re sure to raise 5-10 “reasons” why they’re entitles to take (steal) this domain from the rightful owners.&#8221;</p>
<p>Steve,</p>
<p>If Kellogg went that route there are provisions for countersuing.</p>
<p>Clearly the company operating Eggo.com is not infringing Kellogg&#8217;s TM.</p>
<p>If Kellogg ever succeeded in wresting the domain away via court order &#8211; then watch out!</p>
<p>All hell would break loose in Domainland.</p>
<p>No one would be safe.</p>
<p>Domainer or anyone else.</p>
<p>Patrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/18/leggo-my-eggo-kellogg-loses-domain-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-162047</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/18/leggo-my-eggo-kellogg-loses-domain-dispute/#comment-162047</guid>
		<description>Won&#039;t surprise me if Kellogg takes this to US court; where they&#039;re sure to raise 5-10 &quot;reasons&quot; why they&#039;re entitled to take (steal) this domain from the rightful owners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Won&#8217;t surprise me if Kellogg takes this to US court; where they&#8217;re sure to raise 5-10 &#8220;reasons&#8221; why they&#8217;re entitled to take (steal) this domain from the rightful owners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
