<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American Airlines Sticks to .Com for Mobile Site</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/14/american-airlines-sticks-to-com-for-mobile-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/14/american-airlines-sticks-to-com-for-mobile-site/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:15:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; One and Two Character Domains Coming to .Mobi - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/14/american-airlines-sticks-to-com-for-mobile-site/comment-page-1/#comment-284625</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; One and Two Character Domains Coming to .Mobi - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/14/american-airlines-sticks-to-com-for-mobile-site/#comment-284625</guid>
		<description>[...] example, American Airlines (NYSE: AMR) promotes AA.com for its mobile web site. It may have promoted AA.mobi, but was unable to get this domain name. dotMobi should reach out to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] example, American Airlines (NYSE: AMR) promotes AA.com for its mobile web site. It may have promoted AA.mobi, but was unable to get this domain name. dotMobi should reach out to [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Two Domain Name Observations on a Plane Trip - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/14/american-airlines-sticks-to-com-for-mobile-site/comment-page-1/#comment-247402</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Two Domain Name Observations on a Plane Trip - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/14/american-airlines-sticks-to-com-for-mobile-site/#comment-247402</guid>
		<description>[...] had an ad for accessing flight information at AA.com on your mobile phone. I don&#8217;t want to open that can of worms again, but it wasn&#8217;t a reassuring moment for .mobi when American Airlines launched its mobile [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] had an ad for accessing flight information at AA.com on your mobile phone. I don&#8217;t want to open that can of worms again, but it wasn&#8217;t a reassuring moment for .mobi when American Airlines launched its mobile [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Big Companies Go After .Mobi Domain Names - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/14/american-airlines-sticks-to-com-for-mobile-site/comment-page-1/#comment-216151</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Big Companies Go After .Mobi Domain Names - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/14/american-airlines-sticks-to-com-for-mobile-site/#comment-216151</guid>
		<description>[...] Airlines doesn&#8217;t even forward AmericanAirlines.mobi to its main web site, even though it advertisies aa.com is mobile capable. Standard &amp; Poors - does not resolve Barnes &amp; Noble - does not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Airlines doesn&#8217;t even forward AmericanAirlines.mobi to its main web site, even though it advertisies aa.com is mobile capable. Standard &#38; Poors &#8211; does not resolve Barnes &#38; Noble &#8211; does not [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; .Mobi Domain Names Must Be Short to Succeed - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/14/american-airlines-sticks-to-com-for-mobile-site/comment-page-1/#comment-179070</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; .Mobi Domain Names Must Be Short to Succeed - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/14/american-airlines-sticks-to-com-for-mobile-site/#comment-179070</guid>
		<description>[...] example, there&#8217;s American Airlines (NYSE: AMR), which is using its standard AA.com address and redirecting it to a mobile site. It owns AmericanAirlines.mobi, but that takes a long time to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] example, there&#8217;s American Airlines (NYSE: AMR), which is using its standard AA.com address and redirecting it to a mobile site. It owns AmericanAirlines.mobi, but that takes a long time to [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Acura Chooses .Com for Mobile Web Site - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/14/american-airlines-sticks-to-com-for-mobile-site/comment-page-1/#comment-174654</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Acura Chooses .Com for Mobile Web Site - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 17:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/14/american-airlines-sticks-to-com-for-mobile-site/#comment-174654</guid>
		<description>[...] you get past the point that Acura, just like American Airlines*, has chosen to stick with .com for its mobile site, the next question is if anyone will actually [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] you get past the point that Acura, just like American Airlines*, has chosen to stick with .com for its mobile site, the next question is if anyone will actually [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/14/american-airlines-sticks-to-com-for-mobile-site/comment-page-1/#comment-164952</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/14/american-airlines-sticks-to-com-for-mobile-site/#comment-164952</guid>
		<description>@ Pinky - here&#039;s the problem.  You say:

&quot;There are a bunch of different mobile addressing nomenclatures out in the wild right nowâ€”and not one has emerged as a trusted standard (except .mobi) that anyone anywhere knows for certain will work on their mobile device on the network they are utilizing in their country.&quot;

Although it&#039;s true that a .mobi will work on my phone, I don&#039;t know &quot;for certain&quot; that when I type in a .mobi it will work.  For example, if I type in CNN.mobi it doesn&#039;t resolve, despite the fact that CNN owns it.  So until I can have reasonable certainty that .mobis will resolve to what I think they will, I wouldn&#039;t call it a standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Pinky &#8211; here&#8217;s the problem.  You say:</p>
<p>&#8220;There are a bunch of different mobile addressing nomenclatures out in the wild right nowâ€”and not one has emerged as a trusted standard (except .mobi) that anyone anywhere knows for certain will work on their mobile device on the network they are utilizing in their country.&#8221;</p>
<p>Although it&#8217;s true that a .mobi will work on my phone, I don&#8217;t know &#8220;for certain&#8221; that when I type in a .mobi it will work.  For example, if I type in CNN.mobi it doesn&#8217;t resolve, despite the fact that CNN owns it.  So until I can have reasonable certainty that .mobis will resolve to what I think they will, I wouldn&#8217;t call it a standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinky Brand</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/14/american-airlines-sticks-to-com-for-mobile-site/comment-page-1/#comment-164840</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinky Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/2008/03/14/american-airlines-sticks-to-com-for-mobile-site/#comment-164840</guid>
		<description>I think it would be great if American Airlines could acquire and utilize aa.mobi. However per mTLDs registry agreement with ICANN it is a dotMobi Reserved Name and thus is not currently available for general registration or acquisition by any organization, whether that be American Airlines, Alaska Airlines, Alcoholics Anonymous, Airfare Assistant, etc.

There are a bunch of different mobile addressing nomenclatures out in the wild right now---and not one has emerged as a trusted standard (except .mobi) that anyone anywhere knows for certain will work on their mobile device on the network they are utilizing in their country.   Dot com sites are simply not trustworthy to work on all devices, and then even if browser or device detection is used---not trustworthy to present information in a mobile context that invites repeat visits.  If American Airlines chooses to market aa.com for their mobile audience thatâ€™s their decision. I think they would be wise to get all the traffic they can by utilizing their existing .mobi name assets and thinking of other ways to reach mobile consumers. 

dotMobi continues to work extensively with major brands. In fact, competitors to American Airlines such as KLM (klm.mobi); Spanair (spanair.mobi); Virgin Atlantic (lovefromabove.mobi); Lufthansa (lufthansa.mobi) and Aer Lingus (aerlingus.mobi) have decided to utilize .mobi sites for specific passenger-friendly tasks and outright promotion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would be great if American Airlines could acquire and utilize aa.mobi. However per mTLDs registry agreement with ICANN it is a dotMobi Reserved Name and thus is not currently available for general registration or acquisition by any organization, whether that be American Airlines, Alaska Airlines, Alcoholics Anonymous, Airfare Assistant, etc.</p>
<p>There are a bunch of different mobile addressing nomenclatures out in the wild right now&#8212;and not one has emerged as a trusted standard (except .mobi) that anyone anywhere knows for certain will work on their mobile device on the network they are utilizing in their country.   Dot com sites are simply not trustworthy to work on all devices, and then even if browser or device detection is used&#8212;not trustworthy to present information in a mobile context that invites repeat visits.  If American Airlines chooses to market aa.com for their mobile audience thatâ€™s their decision. I think they would be wise to get all the traffic they can by utilizing their existing .mobi name assets and thinking of other ways to reach mobile consumers. </p>
<p>dotMobi continues to work extensively with major brands. In fact, competitors to American Airlines such as KLM (klm.mobi); Spanair (spanair.mobi); Virgin Atlantic (lovefromabove.mobi); Lufthansa (lufthansa.mobi) and Aer Lingus (aerlingus.mobi) have decided to utilize .mobi sites for specific passenger-friendly tasks and outright promotion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

